Specimen Inactivation Methods for Proteomics─Comparisons of Irradiation, Chemical, and Heat Treatments on Downstream Serum Analyses

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Brooke N. Genovese, , , Nistara Randhawa, , , Gabriela Grigorean, , , Tracy Drazenovich, , , Brett S. Phinney, , , Koen K. A. Van Rompay, , , JoAnn Yee, , , Jonna A. K. Mazet, , and , Brian H. Bird*, 
{"title":"Specimen Inactivation Methods for Proteomics─Comparisons of Irradiation, Chemical, and Heat Treatments on Downstream Serum Analyses","authors":"Brooke N. Genovese,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Nistara Randhawa,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Gabriela Grigorean,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Tracy Drazenovich,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Brett S. Phinney,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Koen K. A. Van Rompay,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;JoAnn Yee,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Jonna A. K. Mazet,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Brian H. Bird*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Multiomic techniques, including proteomics, can provide novel insights for both pathogen detection and assessment of host responses to infection. Numerous studies have described the efficacy of heat inactivation, γ irradiation, or treatment with guanidinium-based chaotropic salts (e.g., TRIzol) for pathogen inactivation of biological samples to ensure biosafety and biosecurity. However, the effect of these methods on the greater serum proteome is less studied. Here, we sought to comprehensively measure the effects of four routinely used pathogen inactivation methods on the serum proteome of Rhesus macaques by characterizing the serum proteome pre-and-post inactivation treatment. Using the R-package MS-DAP for statistical benchmarking, our analysis revealed distinct changes in total peptide/protein detection and individual protein abundances (e.g., ALB, APOA1, and CRP) across inactivation methods and compared to their untreated controls. Specifically, we observed improved quantitative reproducibility in γ-irradiated samples across biological, technical, and experimental replicates compared to chemical inactivation and different heat combinations. These findings represent the first direct, experimental comparisons of effective pathogen inactivation methods on the serologic profiles of nonhuman primates and provide useful criteria for evaluating methods for biological specimen inactivation prior to proteomic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 10","pages":"5282–5291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00290","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiomic techniques, including proteomics, can provide novel insights for both pathogen detection and assessment of host responses to infection. Numerous studies have described the efficacy of heat inactivation, γ irradiation, or treatment with guanidinium-based chaotropic salts (e.g., TRIzol) for pathogen inactivation of biological samples to ensure biosafety and biosecurity. However, the effect of these methods on the greater serum proteome is less studied. Here, we sought to comprehensively measure the effects of four routinely used pathogen inactivation methods on the serum proteome of Rhesus macaques by characterizing the serum proteome pre-and-post inactivation treatment. Using the R-package MS-DAP for statistical benchmarking, our analysis revealed distinct changes in total peptide/protein detection and individual protein abundances (e.g., ALB, APOA1, and CRP) across inactivation methods and compared to their untreated controls. Specifically, we observed improved quantitative reproducibility in γ-irradiated samples across biological, technical, and experimental replicates compared to chemical inactivation and different heat combinations. These findings represent the first direct, experimental comparisons of effective pathogen inactivation methods on the serologic profiles of nonhuman primates and provide useful criteria for evaluating methods for biological specimen inactivation prior to proteomic analysis.

蛋白质组学的标本失活方法──辐射、化学和热处理对下游血清分析的比较。
多组学技术,包括蛋白质组学,可以为病原体检测和评估宿主对感染的反应提供新的见解。许多研究已经描述了热灭活、γ辐照或用胍基杂化盐(如TRIzol)处理生物样品的病原体灭活以确保生物安全和生物安全的有效性。然而,这些方法对更大的血清蛋白质组的影响研究较少。在这里,我们试图通过表征血清蛋白质组失活前和失活后的处理,综合衡量四种常规使用的病原体失活方法对恒河猴血清蛋白质组的影响。使用R-package MS-DAP进行统计基准分析,我们的分析显示,与未处理的对照组相比,不同失活方法的总肽/蛋白检测和个体蛋白丰度(例如,ALB, APOA1和CRP)发生了明显变化。具体来说,与化学灭活和不同的热组合相比,我们观察到γ辐照样品在生物、技术和实验重复中的定量再现性有所提高。这些发现代表了对非人类灵长类动物血清学特征的有效病原体灭活方法的首次直接实验比较,并为在蛋白质组学分析之前评估生物标本灭活方法提供了有用的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信