{"title":"Greening the Narrative: How Organizational Culture Impacts Environmental Disclosures","authors":"Gurmani Chadha, Monica Singhania, Shikha Gupta","doi":"10.1002/bse.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In light of existential dangers to our planet, the urgency to reevaluate corporate practices has never been more palpable. With an emphasis on disclosures, this groundbreaking research sets out to analyze the complex relationship between corporate culture and its significant influence on environmental sustainability within firms. Amidst environmental instability and ongoing calls for corporate responsibility, this study makes use of the comprehensive Competing Values Framework (CVF) to carefully investigate the impact of four key subcultures: control, collaboration, creation, and competition on environmental disclosures. Analyzing the data from 2821 10‐K reports of 403 US companies listed on the S&P 500 index between 2016 and 2022, we utilized Python‐based textual analysis to quantify cultural orientation scores and employed flexible pseudo maximum likelihood estimation (Flex) modeling to address the inherent challenges of analyzing double‐bounded environmental sustainability disclosure data. Results revealed a favorable association between only the “creation” subculture and environmental sustainability disclosures, whereas the “control” and “competition” subcultures acted as barriers to progress with no substantial impact exhibited by the “collaboration” subculture. The significance of organizational culture variables in the presence of board variables emphasizes the distinct nature of corporate culture from top management and highlights the importance of this study, which rectifies the endogeneity present in sustainability models due to the disregard of accounting for corporate culture. This study not only uncovers the way forward, amid unexampled environmental challenges, but also ignites an incendiary call to action that reverberates through boardrooms around the world to create cultures that breed innovation to internalize environmental sustainability.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In light of existential dangers to our planet, the urgency to reevaluate corporate practices has never been more palpable. With an emphasis on disclosures, this groundbreaking research sets out to analyze the complex relationship between corporate culture and its significant influence on environmental sustainability within firms. Amidst environmental instability and ongoing calls for corporate responsibility, this study makes use of the comprehensive Competing Values Framework (CVF) to carefully investigate the impact of four key subcultures: control, collaboration, creation, and competition on environmental disclosures. Analyzing the data from 2821 10‐K reports of 403 US companies listed on the S&P 500 index between 2016 and 2022, we utilized Python‐based textual analysis to quantify cultural orientation scores and employed flexible pseudo maximum likelihood estimation (Flex) modeling to address the inherent challenges of analyzing double‐bounded environmental sustainability disclosure data. Results revealed a favorable association between only the “creation” subculture and environmental sustainability disclosures, whereas the “control” and “competition” subcultures acted as barriers to progress with no substantial impact exhibited by the “collaboration” subculture. The significance of organizational culture variables in the presence of board variables emphasizes the distinct nature of corporate culture from top management and highlights the importance of this study, which rectifies the endogeneity present in sustainability models due to the disregard of accounting for corporate culture. This study not only uncovers the way forward, amid unexampled environmental challenges, but also ignites an incendiary call to action that reverberates through boardrooms around the world to create cultures that breed innovation to internalize environmental sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.