Mathias Christina , David Clark , Fabio Ricardo Marin , Rafael Vasconcelos Ribeiro , Julio Victor Saez , Tendai Polite Chibarabada , Murilo dos Santos Vianna , Matthew R. Jones , Santiago Vianna Cuadra , Osvaldo Machado Rodrigues Cabral , Martin Moises Acreche , Henrique Boriolo Dias
{"title":"Sugarcane radiation use efficiency: varietal differences, temperature dependence, and implications for modeling biomass across environments","authors":"Mathias Christina , David Clark , Fabio Ricardo Marin , Rafael Vasconcelos Ribeiro , Julio Victor Saez , Tendai Polite Chibarabada , Murilo dos Santos Vianna , Matthew R. Jones , Santiago Vianna Cuadra , Osvaldo Machado Rodrigues Cabral , Martin Moises Acreche , Henrique Boriolo Dias","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sugarcane is a major tropical C<sub>4</sub> crop of global economic significance, primarily used for sugar, ethanol, and bioenergy production. As climate change accelerates, with projected increases in global temperatures, understanding the temperature sensitivity of sugarcane's radiation use efficiency (RUE) is crucial for projecting yield under changing environmental conditions. In this context, this study aimed to characterize sugarcane RUE response to temperature across various environments and varieties from key producing regions worldwide. Using experimental data from six countries (Brazil, South Africa, United States of America, Zimbabwe, Argentina, and La Réunion) and 40 distinct varieties, our results indicated that maximum RUE (RUE<sub>MAX</sub>) is consistent across varieties, while apparent RUE (RUE<sub>A</sub>) showed significant variation. Based on this diverse dataset, we parameterized different RUE<sub>MAX</sub> temperature response formalisms used in crop models (APSIM-Sugar, DSSAT-Canegro, MOSICAS, and emergent formalisms). We compared their ability to simulate RUE<sub>A</sub> in various regions accurately. Our analysis revealed significant differences in formalism performance, emphasizing the need for accurate parameterization. Additionally, we demonstrated that predictions of biomass production under climate change scenarios are highly sensitive to the formalism parameterization used to represent the RUE-temperature relationship. These findings highlight the critical importance of refining crop models considering temperature response and cardinal temperatures (optimal range: 30–33°C) to enhance projections of sugarcane yield under future climate conditions. We discussed physiological processes that may explain differences in RUE<sub>A</sub> among varieties. Incorporating these refined mechanisms into models will support more accurate climate impact assessments and aid breeding programs focused on developing high-yield sugarcane varieties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"375 ","pages":"Article 110854"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sugarcane is a major tropical C4 crop of global economic significance, primarily used for sugar, ethanol, and bioenergy production. As climate change accelerates, with projected increases in global temperatures, understanding the temperature sensitivity of sugarcane's radiation use efficiency (RUE) is crucial for projecting yield under changing environmental conditions. In this context, this study aimed to characterize sugarcane RUE response to temperature across various environments and varieties from key producing regions worldwide. Using experimental data from six countries (Brazil, South Africa, United States of America, Zimbabwe, Argentina, and La Réunion) and 40 distinct varieties, our results indicated that maximum RUE (RUEMAX) is consistent across varieties, while apparent RUE (RUEA) showed significant variation. Based on this diverse dataset, we parameterized different RUEMAX temperature response formalisms used in crop models (APSIM-Sugar, DSSAT-Canegro, MOSICAS, and emergent formalisms). We compared their ability to simulate RUEA in various regions accurately. Our analysis revealed significant differences in formalism performance, emphasizing the need for accurate parameterization. Additionally, we demonstrated that predictions of biomass production under climate change scenarios are highly sensitive to the formalism parameterization used to represent the RUE-temperature relationship. These findings highlight the critical importance of refining crop models considering temperature response and cardinal temperatures (optimal range: 30–33°C) to enhance projections of sugarcane yield under future climate conditions. We discussed physiological processes that may explain differences in RUEA among varieties. Incorporating these refined mechanisms into models will support more accurate climate impact assessments and aid breeding programs focused on developing high-yield sugarcane varieties.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.