“I Paid A Bribe”—Lessons and Insights From Crowdsourced Corruption Reporting in India

IF 3.8 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Ina Kubbe, Bonnie J. Palifka, Lasse Buschmann Alsbirk
{"title":"“I Paid A Bribe”—Lessons and Insights From Crowdsourced Corruption Reporting in India","authors":"Ina Kubbe, Bonnie J. Palifka, Lasse Buschmann Alsbirk","doi":"10.1111/rego.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preventing and reducing corruption has proven to be an enormous challenge. An important step in this process is to produce and use good metrics to identify where anti-corruption resources would be most beneficial. Most measures of corruption, however, rely on surveys of perceptions or bribery incidence. Such surveys suffer reporting biases, not least of which is memory bias. Furthermore, they paint a picture of corruption in broad strokes, while reducing corruption requires targeted policies and interventions. User Incidence Reports are collected in real time, reducing memory bias, and potentially provide the details required to target corruption where it is most frequently reported. In this study, we examine the potential research and policy value of user incident reporting platforms like “I Paid A Bribe” (IPAB). IPAB provides rich data on corruption dynamics in India, including specific corruption types, bribe amounts, regional variations, and affected sectors. Using a combination of descriptive statistics and illustrative user reports, we demonstrate IPAB's benefits and identify remaining challenges.","PeriodicalId":21026,"journal":{"name":"Regulation & Governance","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulation & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preventing and reducing corruption has proven to be an enormous challenge. An important step in this process is to produce and use good metrics to identify where anti-corruption resources would be most beneficial. Most measures of corruption, however, rely on surveys of perceptions or bribery incidence. Such surveys suffer reporting biases, not least of which is memory bias. Furthermore, they paint a picture of corruption in broad strokes, while reducing corruption requires targeted policies and interventions. User Incidence Reports are collected in real time, reducing memory bias, and potentially provide the details required to target corruption where it is most frequently reported. In this study, we examine the potential research and policy value of user incident reporting platforms like “I Paid A Bribe” (IPAB). IPAB provides rich data on corruption dynamics in India, including specific corruption types, bribe amounts, regional variations, and affected sectors. Using a combination of descriptive statistics and illustrative user reports, we demonstrate IPAB's benefits and identify remaining challenges.
“我行贿了”——来自印度众包腐败报道的教训和见解
事实证明,预防和减少腐败是一项巨大的挑战。这一过程的一个重要步骤是制定和使用良好的衡量标准,以确定哪些地方的反腐败资源最有益。然而,大多数腐败措施依赖于对人们看法或贿赂发生率的调查。这样的调查存在报道偏差,尤其是记忆偏差。此外,它们笼统地描绘了腐败的图景,而减少腐败需要有针对性的政策和干预。用户事件报告是实时收集的,减少了记忆偏差,并可能提供针对最频繁报告的损坏所需的详细信息。在本研究中,我们考察了“我行贿”(IPAB)等用户事件报告平台的潜在研究和政策价值。IPAB提供了有关印度腐败动态的丰富数据,包括具体的腐败类型、贿赂金额、地区差异和受影响部门。结合使用描述性统计数据和说明性用户报告,我们展示了IPAB的好处,并指出了仍然存在的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Regulation & Governance serves as the leading platform for the study of regulation and governance by political scientists, lawyers, sociologists, historians, criminologists, psychologists, anthropologists, economists and others. Research on regulation and governance, once fragmented across various disciplines and subject areas, has emerged at the cutting edge of paradigmatic change in the social sciences. Through the peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance, we seek to advance discussions between various disciplines about regulation and governance, promote the development of new theoretical and empirical understanding, and serve the growing needs of practitioners for a useful academic reference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信