Intra-articular injections in temporomandibular arthralgia: a systematic review.

IF 1.8
Sanjay Chikkarasinakere Jogigowda, Shilpa Padar Shastry, Varusha Sharon Christopher, Karthikeya Patil, Ritu Basavarajappa, Vidya Gowdappa Doddawad, Deepa B V
{"title":"Intra-articular injections in temporomandibular arthralgia: a systematic review.","authors":"Sanjay Chikkarasinakere Jogigowda, Shilpa Padar Shastry, Varusha Sharon Christopher, Karthikeya Patil, Ritu Basavarajappa, Vidya Gowdappa Doddawad, Deepa B V","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01448-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular injections for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia in adults, comparing various injection types against alternative treatments or placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search across Scopus and Pubmed from January 2015 to December 2024, including randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative clinical trials, and observational studies with control groups. Eligibility criteria required adult patients with clinically diagnosed TMJ arthralgia, various intra-articular injections, and outcome measures including pain reduction and jaw function improvement. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) assessed methodological quality across included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included seven high-quality studies with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 114 participants across multiple countries. All injection types-corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and platelet-rich plasma-demonstrated significant pain reduction and functional improvement within treatment groups. Between-group differences were often not statistically significant in high-quality randomized controlled trials. Specific advantages were noted: sodium hyaluronate may be more effective for reducing joint noises, while corticosteroids showed better short-term pain relief.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence supports intra-articular injections as effective treatment options for TMJ arthralgia, though no single intervention consistently outperformed others across all outcomes. Treatment selection should be individualized based on patient presentation and preferences.</p><p><strong>Other: </strong>This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025632073) and received no external funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01448-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular injections for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia in adults, comparing various injection types against alternative treatments or placebo.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across Scopus and Pubmed from January 2015 to December 2024, including randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative clinical trials, and observational studies with control groups. Eligibility criteria required adult patients with clinically diagnosed TMJ arthralgia, various intra-articular injections, and outcome measures including pain reduction and jaw function improvement. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) assessed methodological quality across included studies.

Results: The review included seven high-quality studies with sample sizes ranging from 20 to 114 participants across multiple countries. All injection types-corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and platelet-rich plasma-demonstrated significant pain reduction and functional improvement within treatment groups. Between-group differences were often not statistically significant in high-quality randomized controlled trials. Specific advantages were noted: sodium hyaluronate may be more effective for reducing joint noises, while corticosteroids showed better short-term pain relief.

Conclusion: The evidence supports intra-articular injections as effective treatment options for TMJ arthralgia, though no single intervention consistently outperformed others across all outcomes. Treatment selection should be individualized based on patient presentation and preferences.

Other: This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025632073) and received no external funding.

关节内注射治疗颞下颌关节痛:系统回顾。
目的:本系统评价关节内注射治疗成人颞下颌关节痛的有效性和安全性,比较不同注射方式与替代治疗或安慰剂的疗效。方法:2015年1月至2024年12月,我们在Scopus和Pubmed上进行了全面的文献检索,包括随机对照试验、前瞻性比较临床试验和对照组观察性研究。入选标准需要临床诊断为TMJ关节痛的成年患者,各种关节内注射,结果测量包括疼痛减轻和颌功能改善。Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)评估了纳入研究的方法学质量。结果:该综述包括7项高质量的研究,样本量从20到114名参与者不等,分布在多个国家。所有注射类型——皮质类固醇、透明质酸和富血小板血浆——在治疗组内均表现出明显的疼痛减轻和功能改善。在高质量的随机对照试验中,组间差异通常没有统计学意义。具体的优势被注意到:透明质酸钠可能更有效地减少关节噪音,而皮质类固醇显示出更好的短期疼痛缓解。结论:证据支持关节内注射是TMJ关节痛的有效治疗选择,尽管没有单一干预措施在所有结果中始终优于其他干预措施。治疗选择应根据患者的表现和偏好进行个体化。其他:本综述在PROSPERO前瞻性注册(CRD42025632073),未获得外部资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信