Psychosocial Impact of Being Denied as a Living Kidney Donor.

IF 0.8
Fern Calkins, Abraham J Matar, Michael G Megaly, Jennifer Wiseman, Dawn Larson, Arthur J Matas, Vanessa Humphreville
{"title":"Psychosocial Impact of Being Denied as a Living Kidney Donor.","authors":"Fern Calkins, Abraham J Matar, Michael G Megaly, Jennifer Wiseman, Dawn Larson, Arthur J Matas, Vanessa Humphreville","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nationally, nearly 50% of living kidney donor (LKD) candidates are denied the opportunity to donate. We studied the psychosocial impact of denial on LKD candidates and explored potential improvements in the evaluation process. A 21-question survey was developed covering topics related to donation denial including emotional responses, communication experiences, and suggestions for process improvement. Of 193 denied candidates contacted, 64 (33.2%) completed the survey. Respondents reported they were denied due to pre-existing conditions (30%), poor kidney function (25%), anatomic abnormalities (19%), malignancy (8%), and other factors (18%). The most commonly reported emotions were feeling disappointed (50%), sad (34%), content (11%), and frustrated (9%). Seventeen respondents (27%) were significantly impacted by the evaluation outcome, of which 9 (14%) reported a significant positive impact; 8 (13%) reported a significant negative impact. Of the 64 candidates, 46 (72%) felt pride they considered donating and none regretted initiating the process. Notably, 26 (41%) offered suggestions for improving the evaluation process, including enhanced communication and follow-up, with 23% desiring a post-denial follow-up call. This study highlights the significant emotional impact of denial on LKD candidates. We recommend setting clear expectations about approval rates, standardizing communication protocols and offering follow-up support through independent living donor advocates and/or support groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nationally, nearly 50% of living kidney donor (LKD) candidates are denied the opportunity to donate. We studied the psychosocial impact of denial on LKD candidates and explored potential improvements in the evaluation process. A 21-question survey was developed covering topics related to donation denial including emotional responses, communication experiences, and suggestions for process improvement. Of 193 denied candidates contacted, 64 (33.2%) completed the survey. Respondents reported they were denied due to pre-existing conditions (30%), poor kidney function (25%), anatomic abnormalities (19%), malignancy (8%), and other factors (18%). The most commonly reported emotions were feeling disappointed (50%), sad (34%), content (11%), and frustrated (9%). Seventeen respondents (27%) were significantly impacted by the evaluation outcome, of which 9 (14%) reported a significant positive impact; 8 (13%) reported a significant negative impact. Of the 64 candidates, 46 (72%) felt pride they considered donating and none regretted initiating the process. Notably, 26 (41%) offered suggestions for improving the evaluation process, including enhanced communication and follow-up, with 23% desiring a post-denial follow-up call. This study highlights the significant emotional impact of denial on LKD candidates. We recommend setting clear expectations about approval rates, standardizing communication protocols and offering follow-up support through independent living donor advocates and/or support groups.

被拒绝作为活体肾脏捐赠者的社会心理影响。
在全国范围内,近50%的活体肾脏捐赠者(LKD)候选人被剥夺了捐赠的机会。我们研究了拒绝对LKD候选人的心理社会影响,并探讨了评估过程中的潜在改进。一项包含21个问题的调查涵盖了与拒绝捐赠相关的主题,包括情绪反应、沟通经验和流程改进建议。在联系的193名被拒绝的候选人中,64名(33.2%)完成了调查。受访者报告说,他们被拒绝是因为已有的疾病(30%)、肾功能不佳(25%)、解剖异常(19%)、恶性肿瘤(8%)和其他因素(18%)。最常见的情绪是失望(50%)、悲伤(34%)、满足(11%)和沮丧(9%)。17个受访者(27%)受到评估结果的显著影响,其中9个受访者(14%)报告了显著的积极影响;8个(13%)报告了显著的负面影响。在64名候选人中,有46人(72%)对自己考虑捐赠感到自豪,没有人后悔发起了捐赠过程。值得注意的是,26人(41%)提出了改进评估过程的建议,包括加强沟通和跟进,23%的人希望在拒绝后进行跟进电话。本研究强调了拒绝对LKD候选人的显著情绪影响。我们建议对批准率设定明确的期望,标准化沟通协议,并通过独立的活体捐赠者倡导者和/或支持团体提供后续支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信