Feasibility and safety of right subclavian vein as an alternative route for retrieval of temporary inferior vena cava filters.

IF 1.5
Tao Peng, Dan Li, Ke-Tong Wu, Yang Liu, Hai-Yang Lai, Yuan Wan, Bo Zhang
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of right subclavian vein as an alternative route for retrieval of temporary inferior vena cava filters.","authors":"Tao Peng, Dan Li, Ke-Tong Wu, Yang Liu, Hai-Yang Lai, Yuan Wan, Bo Zhang","doi":"10.1177/02683555251380913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIn patients with occlusion or severe stenosis of the internal jugular vein, the retrieval of temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filters often proves technically challenging. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the right subclavian vein (SCV) as an alternative access route for retrieving temporary IVC filters.MethodsPatients treated with inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were included in a retrospective analysis between August 2023 and May 2025. A total of 87 eligible patients were divided into two separate groups based on the puncture route; right subclavian vein (SCV) group and internal jugular vein (IJV) group. A retrospective analysis was performed on their patient demographics, operative duration, radiation dose, costs, and postoperative recovery time.ResultsNotable statistical disparities were detected between the two groups in primary disease, operative time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose. Compared with the internal jugular vein (IJV) group, the right subclavian vein (SCV) group exhibited a higher prevalence of primary malignant diseases, along with a mean 7.35-min increase in operative time, 127-s longer fluoroscopy time, and 14.11-mGy higher radiation dose. Follow-up CT assessments revealed sustained patency of the subclavian veins in the right subclavian vein (SCV) group, with no instances of thrombosis or stenosis observed during the postoperative period, or any life-threatening pneumothorax or bleeding was detected.ConclusionsThe right subclavian vein (SCV) approach is suggested as a safe and effective alternative, especially when the internal jugular vein (IJV) is severely stenosed or occluded. For temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval, the conventional internal jugular vein (IJV) route is recommended; however, the right subclavian vein (SCV) may be considered a clinically appropriate alternative in specific indications, without significantly increasing procedural difficulty or surgical costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251380913"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251380913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveIn patients with occlusion or severe stenosis of the internal jugular vein, the retrieval of temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filters often proves technically challenging. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the right subclavian vein (SCV) as an alternative access route for retrieving temporary IVC filters.MethodsPatients treated with inferior vena cava (IVC) filters were included in a retrospective analysis between August 2023 and May 2025. A total of 87 eligible patients were divided into two separate groups based on the puncture route; right subclavian vein (SCV) group and internal jugular vein (IJV) group. A retrospective analysis was performed on their patient demographics, operative duration, radiation dose, costs, and postoperative recovery time.ResultsNotable statistical disparities were detected between the two groups in primary disease, operative time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose. Compared with the internal jugular vein (IJV) group, the right subclavian vein (SCV) group exhibited a higher prevalence of primary malignant diseases, along with a mean 7.35-min increase in operative time, 127-s longer fluoroscopy time, and 14.11-mGy higher radiation dose. Follow-up CT assessments revealed sustained patency of the subclavian veins in the right subclavian vein (SCV) group, with no instances of thrombosis or stenosis observed during the postoperative period, or any life-threatening pneumothorax or bleeding was detected.ConclusionsThe right subclavian vein (SCV) approach is suggested as a safe and effective alternative, especially when the internal jugular vein (IJV) is severely stenosed or occluded. For temporary inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval, the conventional internal jugular vein (IJV) route is recommended; however, the right subclavian vein (SCV) may be considered a clinically appropriate alternative in specific indications, without significantly increasing procedural difficulty or surgical costs.

右锁骨下静脉作为临时下腔静脉滤器取出途径的可行性和安全性。
目的对于颈内静脉闭塞或严重狭窄的患者,下腔静脉(IVC)临时过滤器的取出往往具有技术挑战性。本研究旨在评估右锁骨下静脉(SCV)作为取出临时IVC过滤器的替代通道的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析2023年8月至2025年5月期间接受下腔静脉(IVC)过滤器治疗的患者。87例符合条件的患者根据穿刺路径分为两组;右锁骨下静脉(SCV)组和颈内静脉(IJV)组。回顾性分析患者人口统计学、手术时间、放射剂量、费用和术后恢复时间。结果两组患者在原发疾病、手术时间、透视时间、放射剂量等方面差异均有统计学意义。与颈内静脉(IJV)组相比,右锁骨下静脉(SCV)组原发性恶性疾病患病率更高,手术时间平均增加7.35 min,透视时间平均增加127 s,辐射剂量高14.11 mgy。随访CT评估显示右锁骨下静脉组锁骨下静脉持续通畅,术后未发现血栓形成或狭窄,也未发现任何危及生命的气胸或出血。结论右锁骨下静脉(SCV)入路是一种安全有效的选择,特别是当颈内静脉(IJV)严重狭窄或闭塞时。对于临时下腔静脉(IVC)过滤器取出,建议常规颈内静脉(IJV)途径;然而,在特定适应症中,右锁骨下静脉(SCV)可能被认为是临床合适的替代方法,不会显著增加手术难度或手术费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信