Cross-Sectional Comparison of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep in Shift and Non-Shift Workers Using Wrist and Thigh Accelerometers.

IF 1.4

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-18 DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000003544

Matthew J Fenwick, Stina Oftedal, Tracy Kolbe-Alexander, Dot Dumuid, Mitch J Duncan

{"title":"Cross-Sectional Comparison of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep in Shift and Non-Shift Workers Using Wrist and Thigh Accelerometers.","authors":"Matthew J Fenwick, Stina Oftedal, Tracy Kolbe-Alexander, Dot Dumuid, Mitch J Duncan","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Investigate differences in device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep between shift and non-shift workers, focusing on variations during work and leisure periods.Methods: Full-time employed adult participants from Newcastle, Australia, wore thigh and wrist accelerometers for 14 days to assess activity and sleep. Activity was classified into sedentary, standing, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Linear mixed models and compositional data analysis were employed to assess behavioural time allocation.Results: Forty-nine participants (shift = 33, non-shift = 16) completed the study. During work periods, shift workers were less sedentary ( -79.40 minutes, p = 0.031) and engaged more in LIPA (+39.95 minutes, p = 0.044), but were more sedentary during leisure (+93.59 minutes, p = 0.019).Conclusions: Distinct differences during work and leisure highlight the need for domain-specific analysis.","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Investigate differences in device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep between shift and non-shift workers, focusing on variations during work and leisure periods.

Methods: Full-time employed adult participants from Newcastle, Australia, wore thigh and wrist accelerometers for 14 days to assess activity and sleep. Activity was classified into sedentary, standing, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Linear mixed models and compositional data analysis were employed to assess behavioural time allocation.

Results: Forty-nine participants (shift = 33, non-shift = 16) completed the study. During work periods, shift workers were less sedentary ( -79.40 minutes, p = 0.031) and engaged more in LIPA (+39.95 minutes, p = 0.044), but were more sedentary during leisure (+93.59 minutes, p = 0.019).

Conclusions: Distinct differences during work and leisure highlight the need for domain-specific analysis.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用手腕和大腿加速度计对倒班和非倒班工人的身体活动、久坐行为和睡眠进行横断面比较。

目的：调查轮班和非轮班工人在设备测量的身体活动、久坐行为和睡眠方面的差异，重点关注工作和休闲期间的差异。方法：来自澳大利亚纽卡斯尔的全职成年参与者，佩戴大腿和手腕加速度计14天，以评估活动和睡眠。活动分为久坐、站立、轻强度体力活动（LIPA）和中度至剧烈体力活动（MVPA）。采用线性混合模型和成分数据分析来评估行为时间分配。结果：49名参与者（轮班= 33，非轮班= 16）完成了研究。在工作期间，轮班工作者久坐时间较少（-79.40分钟，p = 0.031），参与LIPA的时间较多（+39.95分钟，p = 0.044），但在休闲时间久坐时间较多（+93.59分钟，p = 0.019）。结论：工作和休闲的显著差异突出了对特定领域进行分析的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine

自引率

0.00%

发文量