Nada Said, Ramzi Ibrahim, Hoang Nhat Pham, George Bcharah, Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Eiad Habib, Reza Arsanjani
{"title":"Angiotensin II receptor blockers and isolated left bundle branch block: A retrospective cohort analysis.","authors":"Nada Said, Ramzi Ibrahim, Hoang Nhat Pham, George Bcharah, Mahmoud Abdelnabi, Eiad Habib, Reza Arsanjani","doi":"10.1177/10815589251366917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and the development of cardiomyopathy. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in adults with isolated LBBB with no known heart failure (HF), cardiomyopathy, or ischemic heart disease. Using the TriNetX global research network, patients were stratified by ARB use and followed for up to 5 years. Propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics. Three thousand two hundred sixty-six patients were included in each group with comparable baseline characteristics. The ARB therapy was not associated with a reduction in new-onset acute HF events (4.9% vs 4.4%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.05 (95% CI 0.84-1.32)). Similarly, there were no significant differences in rates of all-cause hospitalizations, cardiac arrest, or ventricular tachycardia. However, ARB use was associated with a significantly lower, all-cause mortality rate (8.6% vs 12.1%; HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.77)). This is the first real-world study examining ARB use in a cohort with isolated LBBB, highlighting a potential mortality benefit, despite no difference in acute HF risk. While ARBs are not effective in preventing LBBB-induced cardiomyopathy based on these findings, the observed survival advantage warrants further investigation. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying this mortality benefit and to determine whether ARBs should be considered in the management of patients with isolated LBBB.</p>","PeriodicalId":520677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","volume":" ","pages":"10815589251366917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589251366917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chronic left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and the development of cardiomyopathy. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in adults with isolated LBBB with no known heart failure (HF), cardiomyopathy, or ischemic heart disease. Using the TriNetX global research network, patients were stratified by ARB use and followed for up to 5 years. Propensity score matching was performed to balance characteristics. Three thousand two hundred sixty-six patients were included in each group with comparable baseline characteristics. The ARB therapy was not associated with a reduction in new-onset acute HF events (4.9% vs 4.4%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.05 (95% CI 0.84-1.32)). Similarly, there were no significant differences in rates of all-cause hospitalizations, cardiac arrest, or ventricular tachycardia. However, ARB use was associated with a significantly lower, all-cause mortality rate (8.6% vs 12.1%; HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.77)). This is the first real-world study examining ARB use in a cohort with isolated LBBB, highlighting a potential mortality benefit, despite no difference in acute HF risk. While ARBs are not effective in preventing LBBB-induced cardiomyopathy based on these findings, the observed survival advantage warrants further investigation. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying this mortality benefit and to determine whether ARBs should be considered in the management of patients with isolated LBBB.
慢性左束支阻滞(LBBB)与不良的心脏重构和心肌病的发展有关。这项回顾性队列研究评估了血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗对无已知心力衰竭(HF)、心肌病或缺血性心脏病的孤立性LBBB成人心血管结局的影响。使用TriNetX全球研究网络,患者按ARB使用进行分层,并随访长达5年。进行倾向评分匹配以平衡特征。每组有三千二百六十六名具有可比基线特征的患者。ARB治疗与新发急性心衰事件的减少无关(4.9% vs 4.4%;风险比(HR) 1.05 (95% CI 0.84-1.32))。同样,在全因住院率、心脏骤停或室性心动过速方面也没有显著差异。然而,ARB的使用与显著降低的全因死亡率相关(8.6% vs 12.1%;相对危险度0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.77))。这是第一个在孤立性LBBB队列中使用ARB的现实研究,尽管急性HF风险没有差异,但强调了潜在的死亡率益处。基于这些发现,arb在预防lbbb诱导的心肌病方面并不有效,但观察到的生存优势值得进一步研究。需要前瞻性研究来阐明这种死亡率益处的机制,并确定是否应该在孤立性LBBB患者的治疗中考虑arb。