A Multimodel, Resident-Run Medical Student Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Does It Improve NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners) Exam Scores?

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1111/tct.70194
Kathryn Field, Heider Shuber, Maureen Shields
{"title":"A Multimodel, Resident-Run Medical Student Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: Does It Improve NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners) Exam Scores?","authors":"Kathryn Field,&nbsp;Heider Shuber,&nbsp;Maureen Shields","doi":"10.1111/tct.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is variability in clinical rotations for the third year medical students. Many factors (i.e., clinical location, patient volume and medical school didactics) can affect how well the student learns the material needed to succeed on the NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners) exam.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The goal of this study was to design and implement a multimodel, resident-run medical student curriculum and evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum in improving Obstetrics and Gynaecology NBME exam scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>This 2-year medical education quality improvement project went from October 2022 to 2024. The length of the curriculum was 6 weeks, and students met with a resident for two 30-min sessions per week. Each session was designed as a case study for students to answer questions and discuss specific patient scenarios. There was also a weekly plan with supplemental resources for students to review beforehand. A total of 55 students had a reported NBME score and were included in the analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a statistically significant increase in mean NBME scores when compared to the mean score from previous years before the implementation of the curriculum. This was consistent across two medical student groups from two different medical schools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study showed high student satisfaction with the newly implemented curriculum. This may have been due to the multimodel approach and the supplemental material provided for different learning styles. Future studies that are adequately powered and have appropriate controls are needed to better evaluate whether a multimodel approach truly does improve exam performance and to better tease out which specific aspect of the multimodel approach is most helpful.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is variability in clinical rotations for the third year medical students. Many factors (i.e., clinical location, patient volume and medical school didactics) can affect how well the student learns the material needed to succeed on the NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners) exam.

Objectives

The goal of this study was to design and implement a multimodel, resident-run medical student curriculum and evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum in improving Obstetrics and Gynaecology NBME exam scores.

Study Design

This 2-year medical education quality improvement project went from October 2022 to 2024. The length of the curriculum was 6 weeks, and students met with a resident for two 30-min sessions per week. Each session was designed as a case study for students to answer questions and discuss specific patient scenarios. There was also a weekly plan with supplemental resources for students to review beforehand. A total of 55 students had a reported NBME score and were included in the analysis.

Results

There was a statistically significant increase in mean NBME scores when compared to the mean score from previous years before the implementation of the curriculum. This was consistent across two medical student groups from two different medical schools.

Conclusion

This study showed high student satisfaction with the newly implemented curriculum. This may have been due to the multimodel approach and the supplemental material provided for different learning styles. Future studies that are adequately powered and have appropriate controls are needed to better evaluate whether a multimodel approach truly does improve exam performance and to better tease out which specific aspect of the multimodel approach is most helpful.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多模式、住院医师管理的医学生妇产科课程:是否能提高NBME(国家医学检验委员会)考试成绩?
背景:三年级医学生的临床轮转存在差异。许多因素(例如,临床位置、患者数量和医学院教学)都会影响学生在NBME(国家医学考试委员会)考试中成功学习所需材料的程度。目的:本研究旨在设计并实施一套多模式、住院医师管理的医学生课程,并评估该课程对提高妇产科NBME考试成绩的效果。研究设计:本项目为期2年,时间为2022年10月至2024年10月。课程长度为6周,学生每周与一位住院医师会面两次,每次30分钟。每节课都被设计成一个案例研究,让学生们回答问题并讨论具体的病人情况。此外,学校还制定了每周计划,为学生提供补充资源,供他们事先复习。共有55名学生报告了NBME分数,并被纳入分析。结果:与课程实施前几年的平均分相比,NBME平均分有统计学上的显著提高。这在来自两所不同医学院的两组医科学生中是一致的。结论:本研究显示学生对新课程的满意度较高。这可能是由于多模型方法和针对不同学习风格提供的补充材料。未来的研究需要有足够的动力和适当的控制,以更好地评估多模型方法是否真的能提高考试成绩,并更好地梳理出多模型方法的哪个特定方面最有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信