Elyse Ladbrook, Stephane Bouchoucha, Jo McDonall, Anastasia F Hutchinson
{"title":"A systematic review of the cost-impact of sepsis care bundles.","authors":"Elyse Ladbrook, Stephane Bouchoucha, Jo McDonall, Anastasia F Hutchinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of evidence-based sepsis bundles to minimise variation in clinical management of sepsis, improve health outcomes, and associated costs, is well supported in current literature, particularly within high-acuity acute care settings. However, there is limited research evaluating sepsis bundle implementation in subacute, residential aged care facilities (RACF) and broader acute care environments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies reporting financial outcomes associated with use/implementation of sepsis care bundles across acute and subacute healthcare organisations, and RACF. Electronic searches of the Cochrane database, as well as CINAHL Complete and MEDLINE Complete (via the EBSCOHost platform) were conducted between January 2000 to July 2025. Studies were screened and evaluated by two independent researchers. Twelve studies were identified for inclusion, of these 58.33% (n = 7) utilised an established economic evaluation methodology and five studies (41.67%) outlined the cost impact of sepsis bundle implementation. Results highlighted heterogeneity in reported cost outcomes, sepsis definitions, with limited patient level data and evaluation. Despite heterogeneity of findings, the results of this review indicate clinical and economic effectiveness associated with sepsis bundle implementation in the acute care setting. Sepsis bundle implementation was associated with decreased hospital and/or patient costs in 66.7% of studies. Further research is required to evaluate the economic impact of sepsis bundles beyond the acute care environment, including subacute and RACF, in paediatric and adult populations. In addition, greater attention towards cross-jurisdictional standardisation of cost-impact evaluation methods is needed to facilitate performance benchmarking and meta-analysis of outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of evidence-based sepsis bundles to minimise variation in clinical management of sepsis, improve health outcomes, and associated costs, is well supported in current literature, particularly within high-acuity acute care settings. However, there is limited research evaluating sepsis bundle implementation in subacute, residential aged care facilities (RACF) and broader acute care environments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies reporting financial outcomes associated with use/implementation of sepsis care bundles across acute and subacute healthcare organisations, and RACF. Electronic searches of the Cochrane database, as well as CINAHL Complete and MEDLINE Complete (via the EBSCOHost platform) were conducted between January 2000 to July 2025. Studies were screened and evaluated by two independent researchers. Twelve studies were identified for inclusion, of these 58.33% (n = 7) utilised an established economic evaluation methodology and five studies (41.67%) outlined the cost impact of sepsis bundle implementation. Results highlighted heterogeneity in reported cost outcomes, sepsis definitions, with limited patient level data and evaluation. Despite heterogeneity of findings, the results of this review indicate clinical and economic effectiveness associated with sepsis bundle implementation in the acute care setting. Sepsis bundle implementation was associated with decreased hospital and/or patient costs in 66.7% of studies. Further research is required to evaluate the economic impact of sepsis bundles beyond the acute care environment, including subacute and RACF, in paediatric and adult populations. In addition, greater attention towards cross-jurisdictional standardisation of cost-impact evaluation methods is needed to facilitate performance benchmarking and meta-analysis of outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.