Self-reported knowledge, practice and perceived usefulness of Care Bundles: A Pilot Survey among Italian Healthcare Professionals.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Valentina De Nicolò, Alessandra Sinopoli, Paola Santalucia, Maria Silvia Spinelli, Denise Rinaldo, Velia Bruno, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela Coclite
{"title":"Self-reported knowledge, practice and perceived usefulness of Care Bundles: A Pilot Survey among Italian Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Valentina De Nicolò, Alessandra Sinopoli, Paola Santalucia, Maria Silvia Spinelli, Denise Rinaldo, Velia Bruno, Antonello Napoletano, Daniela Coclite","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a global concern, with Italy reporting a 7.5% prevalence, one of the highest rates in Europe. They contribute to longer hospital stays, antimicrobial resistance, and annual costs exceeding EUR 7 billion across Europe. To address HAIs, WHO recommends infection prevention strategies, including Care Bundles (CBs), evidence-based interventions to improve patient safety. Despite their effectiveness, adoption of CBs in Italy remains low (20-25%).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This pilot survey aimed to test the feasibility of a large-scale study on healthcare workers' knowledge and use of CBs in high-risk wards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study took place from October to November 2024. An anonymous online questionnaire, developed according to CHERRIES and CROSS standards, investigated demographics, knowledge, use, and barriers/facilitators to CB implementation, as well as feedback on the tool. Participants-physicians and nursing/obstetric staff from various specialties-were recruited through Scientific Societies and Professional Associations.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 753 healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire (73.5% response rate). Most respondents were from northern regions (43.6%). Nearly half of physicians (49%) were unfamiliar with CBs, though 90% of them expressed interest in training. Among those familiar with CBs, only 57% reported applying them. Anaesthetists and surgeons showed greater awareness than orthopaedists. While 64% of nurses noticed CBs, 53% of obstetricians were unaware, and only 23% of the latter group used them in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey highlights gaps in the knowledge and application of CBs across professional groups, emphasizing the need for targeted strategies to enhance adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a global concern, with Italy reporting a 7.5% prevalence, one of the highest rates in Europe. They contribute to longer hospital stays, antimicrobial resistance, and annual costs exceeding EUR 7 billion across Europe. To address HAIs, WHO recommends infection prevention strategies, including Care Bundles (CBs), evidence-based interventions to improve patient safety. Despite their effectiveness, adoption of CBs in Italy remains low (20-25%).

Aim: This pilot survey aimed to test the feasibility of a large-scale study on healthcare workers' knowledge and use of CBs in high-risk wards.

Methods: The study took place from October to November 2024. An anonymous online questionnaire, developed according to CHERRIES and CROSS standards, investigated demographics, knowledge, use, and barriers/facilitators to CB implementation, as well as feedback on the tool. Participants-physicians and nursing/obstetric staff from various specialties-were recruited through Scientific Societies and Professional Associations.

Findings: A total of 753 healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire (73.5% response rate). Most respondents were from northern regions (43.6%). Nearly half of physicians (49%) were unfamiliar with CBs, though 90% of them expressed interest in training. Among those familiar with CBs, only 57% reported applying them. Anaesthetists and surgeons showed greater awareness than orthopaedists. While 64% of nurses noticed CBs, 53% of obstetricians were unaware, and only 23% of the latter group used them in practice.

Conclusion: The survey highlights gaps in the knowledge and application of CBs across professional groups, emphasizing the need for targeted strategies to enhance adoption in clinical practice.

自我报告的知识、实践和护理包的感知有用性:意大利医疗保健专业人员的试点调查。
背景:医疗保健相关感染(HAIs)是一个全球性问题,意大利报告的患病率为7.5%,是欧洲最高的感染率之一。它们导致住院时间更长,抗微生物药物耐药性,整个欧洲的年成本超过70亿欧元。为了解决卫生保健服务问题,世卫组织建议采取感染预防战略,包括护理包,即以证据为基础的干预措施,以改善患者安全。尽管它们很有效,但意大利的CBs采用率仍然很低(20-25%)。目的:本试点调查旨在检验对高危病房医护人员CBs知识和使用情况进行大规模研究的可行性。方法:研究时间为2024年10 - 11月。根据cherry和CROSS标准开发的匿名在线问卷调查了人口统计、知识、使用情况、CB实施的障碍/促进因素,以及对工具的反馈。参与者——来自不同专业的医生和护理/产科工作人员——是通过科学协会和专业协会招募的。结果:共有753名医护人员完成问卷调查,回复率为73.5%。大多数受访者来自北方地区(43.6%)。近一半的医生(49%)不熟悉CBs,尽管其中90%表示有兴趣接受培训。在熟悉CBs的受访者中,只有57%的人表示申请了CBs。麻醉师和外科医生比骨科医生表现出更强的意识。虽然有64%的护士注意到了CBs,但53%的产科医生对此并不知情,只有23%的产科医生在实践中使用了CBs。结论:该调查突出了各专业群体在知识和应用CBs方面的差距,强调需要有针对性的策略来提高临床实践中的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信