Ramy Elkady, Seamus McHugh, Elrasheid Kheirelseid, Peter Naughton, Daragh Moneley, Sayed Aly, Stewart Redmond Walsh
{"title":"The role of Cerament® (Antibiotic impregnated bone void filler) in lower limb salvage for diabetic foot patients with osteomyelitis, a scoping review.","authors":"Ramy Elkady, Seamus McHugh, Elrasheid Kheirelseid, Peter Naughton, Daragh Moneley, Sayed Aly, Stewart Redmond Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a principal cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputation, contributing substantially to morbidity, healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Salvage optimization strategies have included the use of local antibiotic carriers to promote healing and reduce infection recurrence. Cerament, either G (gentamicin) or V (vancomycin), resorbable antibiotic-loaded bone graft substitute, has shown potential, but evidence has not been systematically mapped.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to map and summarize the available literature on the role of Cerament G and V in lower limb salvage among patients with DFO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Google scholar [December 2024]. Studies reporting outcomes of Cerament G or V in the management of DFO were eligible. Data were charted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, focusing on study design, intervention details, and key findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were identified, including [case reports, case series, retrospective reviews, and prospective cohorts]. Population within the studies ranged from 1 to 136. Reported outcomes included wound healing, eradication of infection, weight bearing, new bone formation and high antibiotic concentration without systemic toxicity. Amputation rates ranged from 2.6 % to 25 %. Evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and lack of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence suggests that Cerament G and V may be safe and effective adjuncts for limb salvage in DFO, but high-quality comparative studies are lacking. Further research is needed to support its broader use in daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.09.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a principal cause of non-traumatic lower limb amputation, contributing substantially to morbidity, healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. Salvage optimization strategies have included the use of local antibiotic carriers to promote healing and reduce infection recurrence. Cerament, either G (gentamicin) or V (vancomycin), resorbable antibiotic-loaded bone graft substitute, has shown potential, but evidence has not been systematically mapped.
Objective: This scoping review aimed to map and summarize the available literature on the role of Cerament G and V in lower limb salvage among patients with DFO.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Google scholar [December 2024]. Studies reporting outcomes of Cerament G or V in the management of DFO were eligible. Data were charted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, focusing on study design, intervention details, and key findings.
Results: A total of 20 studies were identified, including [case reports, case series, retrospective reviews, and prospective cohorts]. Population within the studies ranged from 1 to 136. Reported outcomes included wound healing, eradication of infection, weight bearing, new bone formation and high antibiotic concentration without systemic toxicity. Amputation rates ranged from 2.6 % to 25 %. Evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and lack of randomized controlled trials.
Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that Cerament G and V may be safe and effective adjuncts for limb salvage in DFO, but high-quality comparative studies are lacking. Further research is needed to support its broader use in daily practice.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.