Finite Element Analysis of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixture of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Chao-qing Huang, Xiao-wei Huang, Xing Wu
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis of Three Different Intramedullary Nails for Fixture of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures","authors":"Chao-qing Huang,&nbsp;Xiao-wei Huang,&nbsp;Xing Wu","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We aimed to analyze the effects of PFNA, InterTAN, and Gamma nails for the fixture of unstable intertrochanteric fractures (UIFs) by finite element analysis. 3D reconstruction models fixed with PFNA, InterTAN, and Gamma nail of the normal femur and unstable intertrochanteric fractures were created. Boundary conditions and load were set in advance, and finite element analysis was performed. Interfragmentary strain theory (IFS) was used to simulate the growth of callus. The Python language was used for the secondary development of ABAQUS to simulate the fracture healing process. The principal strain of the femur and the Von Mises stress of the device component were evaluated and compared by three nail fixation methods under four load conditions. There was no significant difference between InterTAN and Gamma nails in terms of peak strain within the implanted bone and maximum device stress values, and both bone strain and implant stress state were lower in the femur after implantation of PFNA nail fixation. Finite element analyses show that the Gamma nail is more suitable for fixing 31A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture. PFNA is more suitable for fixing UIFs except for 31A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture. Therefore, the implantation of PFNA nails in the femur can withstand more forces during exercise than InterTAN and Gamma nails, which have a faster pre-healing phase and are therefore more suitable for small fractures.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to analyze the effects of PFNA, InterTAN, and Gamma nails for the fixture of unstable intertrochanteric fractures (UIFs) by finite element analysis. 3D reconstruction models fixed with PFNA, InterTAN, and Gamma nail of the normal femur and unstable intertrochanteric fractures were created. Boundary conditions and load were set in advance, and finite element analysis was performed. Interfragmentary strain theory (IFS) was used to simulate the growth of callus. The Python language was used for the secondary development of ABAQUS to simulate the fracture healing process. The principal strain of the femur and the Von Mises stress of the device component were evaluated and compared by three nail fixation methods under four load conditions. There was no significant difference between InterTAN and Gamma nails in terms of peak strain within the implanted bone and maximum device stress values, and both bone strain and implant stress state were lower in the femur after implantation of PFNA nail fixation. Finite element analyses show that the Gamma nail is more suitable for fixing 31A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture. PFNA is more suitable for fixing UIFs except for 31A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture. Therefore, the implantation of PFNA nails in the femur can withstand more forces during exercise than InterTAN and Gamma nails, which have a faster pre-healing phase and are therefore more suitable for small fractures.

三种不同髓内钉固定不稳定转子间骨折的有限元分析。
我们旨在通过有限元分析分析PFNA、InterTAN和Gamma钉固定不稳定转子间骨折(UIFs)的效果。用PFNA、InterTAN和Gamma钉固定正常股骨和不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的3D重建模型。预先设定边界条件和载荷,进行有限元分析。采用断片间应变理论(IFS)模拟愈伤组织的生长。采用Python语言对ABAQUS进行二次开发,模拟骨折愈合过程。在四种载荷条件下,采用三种钉固定方法对股骨主应变和装置构件的Von Mises应力进行了评估和比较。InterTAN和Gamma钉在植入骨内的峰值应变和最大装置应力值方面无显著差异,PFNA钉内固定后股骨内的骨应变和种植体应力状态均较低。有限元分析表明Gamma钉更适合于固定31A2.2股骨粗隆间骨折。除31A2.2粗隆间骨折外,PFNA更适合固定uif。因此,与InterTAN和Gamma钉相比,PFNA钉在股骨内植入可以在运动时承受更大的力,其预愈合阶段更快,因此更适合于小骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信