Within These Four Walls: televisualizing museum spaces of science, 1950-1971.

IF 1.2 1区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Rupert Cole
{"title":"<i>Within These Four Walls</i>: televisualizing museum spaces of science, 1950-1971.","authors":"Rupert Cole","doi":"10.1017/S000708742510112X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper examines BBC television programmes that feature museum spaces of science and technology, contextualizing the development of this programme type in the 1950s and 1960s with science (and history-of-science) broadcasting. In 1971, the BBC televised a ten-part series devoted to UK science and technology museums. <i>Within These Four Walls</i>, the central case study, featured episodes filmed at the Natural History Museum, the National Maritime Museum, the Royal Institution and the Science Museum, among others; its televisual tour guides included prominent science broadcasters - Patrick Moore, George Porter and Eric Laithwaite - as well as curators and scholars of the history of science, such as Joseph Needham. The paper explores, using intermediality as an analytical category, how the museological conventions of curated gallery displays and tours have been adapted and transposed to television. In doing so, it reflects on the historiographies that emerge from this intermedial product (a series of televised museum tours), arguing that they should be interpreted in the cultural context of the early 1970s. It concludes that the presentation of historical authenticity through intermedial constructions of place, objects and performances conferred what Thomas Gieryn has dubbed 'truth spots' on history-of-science narratives for audiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":46655,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708742510112X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines BBC television programmes that feature museum spaces of science and technology, contextualizing the development of this programme type in the 1950s and 1960s with science (and history-of-science) broadcasting. In 1971, the BBC televised a ten-part series devoted to UK science and technology museums. Within These Four Walls, the central case study, featured episodes filmed at the Natural History Museum, the National Maritime Museum, the Royal Institution and the Science Museum, among others; its televisual tour guides included prominent science broadcasters - Patrick Moore, George Porter and Eric Laithwaite - as well as curators and scholars of the history of science, such as Joseph Needham. The paper explores, using intermediality as an analytical category, how the museological conventions of curated gallery displays and tours have been adapted and transposed to television. In doing so, it reflects on the historiographies that emerge from this intermedial product (a series of televised museum tours), arguing that they should be interpreted in the cultural context of the early 1970s. It concludes that the presentation of historical authenticity through intermedial constructions of place, objects and performances conferred what Thomas Gieryn has dubbed 'truth spots' on history-of-science narratives for audiences.

在这四堵墙内:科学博物馆空间的电视化,1950-1971。
本文研究了以科学和技术博物馆为特色的BBC电视节目,将这种节目类型在20世纪50年代和60年代的发展与科学(和科学史)广播联系起来。1971年,英国广播公司播出了一部专门介绍英国科技博物馆的十集系列节目。在这四堵墙内,中心案例研究包括在自然历史博物馆、国家海事博物馆、皇家学会和科学博物馆等地拍摄的情节;它的电视导游包括著名的科学广播员——Patrick Moore、George Porter和Eric Laithwaite——以及科学史的策展人和学者,如Joseph Needham。本文以中间性作为分析范畴,探讨了策展画廊展示和参观的博物馆学惯例是如何适应并转移到电视上的。在这样做的过程中,它反思了从这个中间产品(一系列电视博物馆之旅)中产生的历史编纂,认为它们应该在20世纪70年代初的文化背景下进行解释。它的结论是,通过地点、物体和表演的中间结构来呈现历史真实性,为观众提供了托马斯·吉林(Thomas Gieryn)所称的科学史叙事的“真相点”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: This leading international journal publishes scholarly papers and review articles on all aspects of the history of science. History of science is interpreted widely to include medicine, technology and social studies of science. BJHS papers make important and lively contributions to scholarship and the journal has been an essential library resource for more than thirty years. It is also used extensively by historians and scholars in related fields. A substantial book review section is a central feature. There are four issues a year, comprising an annual volume of over 600 pages. Published for the British Society for the History of Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信