[Lifecycle Environmental Impact Assessment and Uncertainty Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Coach].

Q2 Environmental Science
Ze-Lin Wang, Jia-Kun Si, Qing-Shan Liu
{"title":"[Lifecycle Environmental Impact Assessment and Uncertainty Analysis of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Coach].","authors":"Ze-Lin Wang, Jia-Kun Si, Qing-Shan Liu","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202408072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of hydrogen fuel cell coach (HFCC) presents an ideal solution to address challenges such as energy security and air pollution. To quantify the life-cycle environmental impacts of HFCCs, a comprehensive evaluation model was established based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. This model assesses material resource consumption, fossil energy consumption, carbon emissions, and pollutant emissions throughout the HFCC lifecycle, incorporating uncertainty analysis of key influencing factors. The study investigates the environmental impacts under various scenarios, including different fuel cell degradation scenarios, electricity structures, and hydrogen pathways. The results indicate that the material resource consumption was highest during the raw material acquisition phase. During the operation and use stage, the consumption of fossil energy, carbon emissions, and pollutant emissions accounted for the largest proportion, mainly due to the large consumption of hydrogen energy by HFCCs during their lifespan and the high energy consumption in the hydrogen production process. Through photovoltaic electrolysis of water for hydrogen production technology, the energy consumption and carbon emissions of HFCCs could be significantly reduced throughout its entire lifecycle. Under a simulated fuel cell degradation scenario in which hydrogen consumption increased by 13.9%, the life cycle energy consumption of HFCCs based on photovoltaic electrolysis water increased by 12.05%, and carbon emissions increased by 9.21%. Optimizing the hydrogen path can improve environmental effects. When photovoltaic electrolysis water for hydrogen production was matched with pipeline transportation of hydrogen, the life cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions of HFCCs were the lowest. Therefore, HFCCs based on hydrogen production from renewable energy sources showed significant potential for energy saving and emission reduction in the future. In contrast, HFCCs relying on mixed power electrolysis for hydrogen production was relatively weak in terms of energy saving and emission reduction. At the same time, it is recommended to use pipeline hydrogen transportation as the main transportation mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 9","pages":"5595-5607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202408072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of hydrogen fuel cell coach (HFCC) presents an ideal solution to address challenges such as energy security and air pollution. To quantify the life-cycle environmental impacts of HFCCs, a comprehensive evaluation model was established based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. This model assesses material resource consumption, fossil energy consumption, carbon emissions, and pollutant emissions throughout the HFCC lifecycle, incorporating uncertainty analysis of key influencing factors. The study investigates the environmental impacts under various scenarios, including different fuel cell degradation scenarios, electricity structures, and hydrogen pathways. The results indicate that the material resource consumption was highest during the raw material acquisition phase. During the operation and use stage, the consumption of fossil energy, carbon emissions, and pollutant emissions accounted for the largest proportion, mainly due to the large consumption of hydrogen energy by HFCCs during their lifespan and the high energy consumption in the hydrogen production process. Through photovoltaic electrolysis of water for hydrogen production technology, the energy consumption and carbon emissions of HFCCs could be significantly reduced throughout its entire lifecycle. Under a simulated fuel cell degradation scenario in which hydrogen consumption increased by 13.9%, the life cycle energy consumption of HFCCs based on photovoltaic electrolysis water increased by 12.05%, and carbon emissions increased by 9.21%. Optimizing the hydrogen path can improve environmental effects. When photovoltaic electrolysis water for hydrogen production was matched with pipeline transportation of hydrogen, the life cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions of HFCCs were the lowest. Therefore, HFCCs based on hydrogen production from renewable energy sources showed significant potential for energy saving and emission reduction in the future. In contrast, HFCCs relying on mixed power electrolysis for hydrogen production was relatively weak in terms of energy saving and emission reduction. At the same time, it is recommended to use pipeline hydrogen transportation as the main transportation mode.

氢燃料电池客车全生命周期环境影响评价与不确定性分析
氢燃料电池客车(HFCC)的发展为解决能源安全和空气污染等挑战提供了理想的解决方案。为了量化氢氟碳化合物的生命周期环境影响,基于生命周期评价(LCA)方法建立了氢氟碳化合物的综合评价模型。该模型评估了HFCC整个生命周期的物质资源消耗、化石能源消耗、碳排放和污染物排放,并对关键影响因素进行了不确定性分析。该研究调查了不同情况下的环境影响,包括不同的燃料电池降解情况、电力结构和氢途径。结果表明,在原料获取阶段,材料资源消耗最高。在运行和使用阶段,化石能源消耗、碳排放和污染物排放所占比例最大,这主要是由于氢氟碳化合物在其使用寿命期间消耗氢能源大,制氢过程能耗高。通过光伏电解制氢水技术,可以显著降低氢氟碳化合物全生命周期的能耗和碳排放。在氢消耗增加13.9%的模拟燃料电池降解情景下,基于光伏电解水的氢氟碳化合物全生命周期能耗增加12.05%,碳排放增加9.21%。优化氢路径可以改善环境效果。当光伏电解制氢用水与氢气管道输送相匹配时,氢氟碳化合物的全生命周期能耗和碳排放量最低。因此,基于可再生能源制氢的氢氟碳化合物在未来具有巨大的节能减排潜力。相比之下,依靠混合动力电解制氢的氢氟碳化合物在节能减排方面相对较弱。同时建议以管道输氢为主要运输方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信