[Emission Reduction Mechanism of Carbon Trading Policy and Industry Heterogeneity: Evidence from Inter-Provincial Industrial Sub-sectors].

Q2 Environmental Science
Xin-Xin Yu, Ming-Dong Jiang, Jia-Nan Li, Ze-Peng Wu
{"title":"[Emission Reduction Mechanism of Carbon Trading Policy and Industry Heterogeneity: Evidence from Inter-Provincial Industrial Sub-sectors].","authors":"Xin-Xin Yu, Ming-Dong Jiang, Jia-Nan Li, Ze-Peng Wu","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202408049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clarifying the heterogeneity of the driving mechanism of the carbon trading market for different industries can provide more detailed theoretical references for the design of targeted emission reduction programs. Based on three-dimensional panel data of 27 subdivided industrial sectors in 30 provinces in China from 2007 to 2019, a multi-period double-difference model is constructed to empirically test the industrial emission reduction effect of the carbon trading market pilot policy and its mechanism of action. The empirical results show that carbon trading policies can effectively reduce the carbon emissions of the industrial sectors, with their impact showing a certain lag effect. Specifically, its impact coefficients on production scale, technological innovation, and carbon emission intensity are -0.156, 0.377, and -0.251, respectively. This indicates that although the industrial sector achieves emission reduction under the carbon trading market system by upgrading the level of technological innovation and lowering the intensity of carbon emissions, it also compresses the production scale to a certain extent. In addition, there is an antagonistic relationship between growth and emission reduction targets. Further research showed that carbon trading policies have a greater reduction effect on sectors with low capital returns, such as ferrous metal mining and dressing and non-metallic mineral products, as well as sectors with low technology intensity such as textiles, garments, footwear, leather and its products, and coal mining and washing. Furthermore, they have a better quality improvement effect on carbon-intensive sectors such as electricity, gas, water production and supply, and ferrous metal smelting and rolling processing. Based on these conclusions, this paper proposes relevant policy recommendations for improving the carbon market system according to targeted industrial technology and emission characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 9","pages":"5503-5511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202408049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clarifying the heterogeneity of the driving mechanism of the carbon trading market for different industries can provide more detailed theoretical references for the design of targeted emission reduction programs. Based on three-dimensional panel data of 27 subdivided industrial sectors in 30 provinces in China from 2007 to 2019, a multi-period double-difference model is constructed to empirically test the industrial emission reduction effect of the carbon trading market pilot policy and its mechanism of action. The empirical results show that carbon trading policies can effectively reduce the carbon emissions of the industrial sectors, with their impact showing a certain lag effect. Specifically, its impact coefficients on production scale, technological innovation, and carbon emission intensity are -0.156, 0.377, and -0.251, respectively. This indicates that although the industrial sector achieves emission reduction under the carbon trading market system by upgrading the level of technological innovation and lowering the intensity of carbon emissions, it also compresses the production scale to a certain extent. In addition, there is an antagonistic relationship between growth and emission reduction targets. Further research showed that carbon trading policies have a greater reduction effect on sectors with low capital returns, such as ferrous metal mining and dressing and non-metallic mineral products, as well as sectors with low technology intensity such as textiles, garments, footwear, leather and its products, and coal mining and washing. Furthermore, they have a better quality improvement effect on carbon-intensive sectors such as electricity, gas, water production and supply, and ferrous metal smelting and rolling processing. Based on these conclusions, this paper proposes relevant policy recommendations for improving the carbon market system according to targeted industrial technology and emission characteristics.

碳交易政策减排机制与产业异质性:来自省际产业子部门的证据。
厘清不同行业碳交易市场驱动机制的异质性,可以为针对性减排方案的设计提供更详细的理论参考。基于2007 - 2019年中国30个省份27个细分行业的三维面板数据,构建多期双差模型,实证检验碳交易市场试点政策的工业减排效果及其作用机制。实证结果表明,碳交易政策能够有效降低工业部门的碳排放,其影响表现出一定的滞后效应。其中,对生产规模、技术创新和碳排放强度的影响系数分别为-0.156、0.377和-0.251。这说明在碳交易市场体制下,工业部门虽然通过提升技术创新水平、降低碳排放强度来实现减排,但也在一定程度上压缩了生产规模。此外,经济增长与减排目标之间存在对抗关系。进一步的研究表明,碳交易政策对资本回报率较低的部门,如黑色金属开采和选矿、非金属矿产品,以及技术强度较低的部门,如纺织、服装、鞋类、皮革及其制品、煤炭开采和洗涤,具有更大的减排作用。此外,在电力、天然气、水的生产和供应以及黑色金属冶炼和轧制加工等碳密集型行业,它们具有更好的质量改善效果。基于以上结论,本文针对目标产业技术和排放特点,提出了完善碳市场体系的相关政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信