Circadian Phase Assessment of Core Body Temperature Using a Wearable Temperature Sensor Under the Real World.

IF 1.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sleep Science Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1800785
Naoko Kubota, Kazufumi Okada, Yujiro Yamanaka
{"title":"Circadian Phase Assessment of Core Body Temperature Using a Wearable Temperature Sensor Under the Real World.","authors":"Naoko Kubota, Kazufumi Okada, Yujiro Yamanaka","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a patch-type wearable temperature sensor (CALERA Research) could determine the circadian phase of core body temperature (CBT) in a manner like a rectal probe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sixteen participants (27 ± 11 years, 8 males and 8 females) wore an actigraph and CALERA Research sensor on the chest region for 3-5 days in a real-world setting. Simultaneous rectal temperature measurements were performed during the nocturnal sleep period. The midpoints of the nocturnal decrease in CBT (CBT <sub>trough</sub> ) were used as the circadian phase marker. We analyzed 60 pairs of CBT <sub>trough</sub> . The reliability and agreement of the CBT <sub>trough</sub> from the two devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify the limit of agreement of CBT <sub>trough</sub> between the devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The ICC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.98) and CCC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97) values indicated excellent reliability and substantial agreement, respectively. The mean bias was 0.16 hours (95%LoA: -0.76-1.07 hours). The mean CBT <sub>trough</sub> comparison was 5.9 ± 1.6 hours in the CALERA Research sensor and 5.8 ± 1.7 hours in the rectal probe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in the CBT <sub>trough</sub> between the two devices was about ± 1.0 hour which would be an acceptable range for determining the CBT <sub>trough</sub> . We suggest that the CALERA Research sensor could be a useful tool for reasonably estimating the circadian phase of CBT <sub>trough</sub> and providing a surrogate for a rectal probe.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"18 3","pages":"e246-e252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether a patch-type wearable temperature sensor (CALERA Research) could determine the circadian phase of core body temperature (CBT) in a manner like a rectal probe.

Objective: Sixteen participants (27 ± 11 years, 8 males and 8 females) wore an actigraph and CALERA Research sensor on the chest region for 3-5 days in a real-world setting. Simultaneous rectal temperature measurements were performed during the nocturnal sleep period. The midpoints of the nocturnal decrease in CBT (CBT trough ) were used as the circadian phase marker. We analyzed 60 pairs of CBT trough . The reliability and agreement of the CBT trough from the two devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify the limit of agreement of CBT trough between the devices.

Objective: The ICC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.98) and CCC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97) values indicated excellent reliability and substantial agreement, respectively. The mean bias was 0.16 hours (95%LoA: -0.76-1.07 hours). The mean CBT trough comparison was 5.9 ± 1.6 hours in the CALERA Research sensor and 5.8 ± 1.7 hours in the rectal probe.

Conclusion: The difference in the CBT trough between the two devices was about ± 1.0 hour which would be an acceptable range for determining the CBT trough . We suggest that the CALERA Research sensor could be a useful tool for reasonably estimating the circadian phase of CBT trough and providing a surrogate for a rectal probe.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在真实世界中使用可穿戴温度传感器评估核心体温的昼夜节律阶段。
目的:评估贴片式可穿戴温度传感器(CALERA Research)能否像直肠探头一样确定核心体温(CBT)的昼夜节律阶段。目的:在现实环境中,16名参与者(27±11岁,8男8女)在胸部佩戴活动记录仪和CALERA Research传感器3-5天。在夜间睡眠期间同时进行直肠温度测量。CBT夜间减少的中点(CBT谷)被用作昼夜节律阶段标记。我们通过CBT分析了60对患者。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和一致性相关系数(CCC)分析两种设备CBT槽的可靠性和一致性。Bland-Altman分析用于量化两种设备间CBT一致性的极限。目的:ICC值为0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.98), CCC值为0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97),表明具有良好的信度和一致性。平均偏差为0.16小时(95%LoA: -0.76-1.07小时)。通过比较,CALERA Research传感器的平均CBT为5.9±1.6小时,直肠探头的平均CBT为5.8±1.7小时。结论:两种装置的CBT波谷差约为±1.0 h,可用于确定CBT波谷。我们建议CALERA研究传感器可以成为一种有用的工具,通过合理估计CBT的昼夜节律阶段,并提供直肠探针的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep Science
Sleep Science CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信