{"title":"Circadian Phase Assessment of Core Body Temperature Using a Wearable Temperature Sensor Under the Real World.","authors":"Naoko Kubota, Kazufumi Okada, Yujiro Yamanaka","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a patch-type wearable temperature sensor (CALERA Research) could determine the circadian phase of core body temperature (CBT) in a manner like a rectal probe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sixteen participants (27 ± 11 years, 8 males and 8 females) wore an actigraph and CALERA Research sensor on the chest region for 3-5 days in a real-world setting. Simultaneous rectal temperature measurements were performed during the nocturnal sleep period. The midpoints of the nocturnal decrease in CBT (CBT <sub>trough</sub> ) were used as the circadian phase marker. We analyzed 60 pairs of CBT <sub>trough</sub> . The reliability and agreement of the CBT <sub>trough</sub> from the two devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify the limit of agreement of CBT <sub>trough</sub> between the devices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The ICC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.98) and CCC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97) values indicated excellent reliability and substantial agreement, respectively. The mean bias was 0.16 hours (95%LoA: -0.76-1.07 hours). The mean CBT <sub>trough</sub> comparison was 5.9 ± 1.6 hours in the CALERA Research sensor and 5.8 ± 1.7 hours in the rectal probe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The difference in the CBT <sub>trough</sub> between the two devices was about ± 1.0 hour which would be an acceptable range for determining the CBT <sub>trough</sub> . We suggest that the CALERA Research sensor could be a useful tool for reasonably estimating the circadian phase of CBT <sub>trough</sub> and providing a surrogate for a rectal probe.</p>","PeriodicalId":21848,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Science","volume":"18 3","pages":"e246-e252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether a patch-type wearable temperature sensor (CALERA Research) could determine the circadian phase of core body temperature (CBT) in a manner like a rectal probe.
Objective: Sixteen participants (27 ± 11 years, 8 males and 8 females) wore an actigraph and CALERA Research sensor on the chest region for 3-5 days in a real-world setting. Simultaneous rectal temperature measurements were performed during the nocturnal sleep period. The midpoints of the nocturnal decrease in CBT (CBT trough ) were used as the circadian phase marker. We analyzed 60 pairs of CBT trough . The reliability and agreement of the CBT trough from the two devices were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify the limit of agreement of CBT trough between the devices.
Objective: The ICC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.98) and CCC of 0.96 (95%CI: 0.93-0.97) values indicated excellent reliability and substantial agreement, respectively. The mean bias was 0.16 hours (95%LoA: -0.76-1.07 hours). The mean CBT trough comparison was 5.9 ± 1.6 hours in the CALERA Research sensor and 5.8 ± 1.7 hours in the rectal probe.
Conclusion: The difference in the CBT trough between the two devices was about ± 1.0 hour which would be an acceptable range for determining the CBT trough . We suggest that the CALERA Research sensor could be a useful tool for reasonably estimating the circadian phase of CBT trough and providing a surrogate for a rectal probe.