Beyond Malabsorption: The Need for Symptom-Based Assessment in Suspected Lactose Intolerance. Lessons From a Test-Specific Symptom Assessment.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Johann Hammer, Heinz F Hammer
{"title":"Beyond Malabsorption: The Need for Symptom-Based Assessment in Suspected Lactose Intolerance. Lessons From a Test-Specific Symptom Assessment.","authors":"Johann Hammer, Heinz F Hammer","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lactose malabsorption is commonly assumed to cause gastrointestinal discomfort, but symptoms often persist despite lactose restriction or enzyme supplementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess symptoms following lactose ingestion, its relationship with malabsorption, and its association with fructose sensitivity and disorders of the gut-brain interactions (DGBIs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In 753 consecutive patients with DGBIs, we performed hydrogen breath tests and used the validated adult Carbohydrate Perception Questionnaire (aCPQ) to assess lactose-induced symptoms. Lactose malabsorption (LM+) was defined as a hydrogen increase of > 20 ppm. Lactose induced burdensome symptoms (LS+) were defined by a visual analogue scale (VAS) increase of > 20 mm. Fructose sensitivity was assessed in 547 patients using the same protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LM+ was observed in 40.9% of patients, while 55.4% reported LS+. Interestingly, 45.3% of symptomatic patients had no lactose malabsorption (LM-) and 26.0% of malabsorbers had no symptoms (LS-). LS+ were significantly more likely to exhibit fructose sensitivity (45.2% vs. 24.2% in LS-, p < 0.001). DGBIs were similarly distributed in LS+ patients with and without malabsorption. Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome were significantly more frequent in LS+, irrespective of whether lactose was malabsorbed or not, than in those without lactose-induced symptoms (with or without malabsorption).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lactose malabsorption alone is an inadequate predictor of the occurrence of symptoms, emphasizing the need for comprehensive symptom assessment beyond breath test results. This has important implications for the selection of appropriate therapies. The association between lactose and fructose sensitivity suggests a role for visceral hypersensitivity and overlapping mechanisms in symptom development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lactose malabsorption is commonly assumed to cause gastrointestinal discomfort, but symptoms often persist despite lactose restriction or enzyme supplementation.

Objective: This study aimed to assess symptoms following lactose ingestion, its relationship with malabsorption, and its association with fructose sensitivity and disorders of the gut-brain interactions (DGBIs).

Design: In 753 consecutive patients with DGBIs, we performed hydrogen breath tests and used the validated adult Carbohydrate Perception Questionnaire (aCPQ) to assess lactose-induced symptoms. Lactose malabsorption (LM+) was defined as a hydrogen increase of > 20 ppm. Lactose induced burdensome symptoms (LS+) were defined by a visual analogue scale (VAS) increase of > 20 mm. Fructose sensitivity was assessed in 547 patients using the same protocol.

Results: LM+ was observed in 40.9% of patients, while 55.4% reported LS+. Interestingly, 45.3% of symptomatic patients had no lactose malabsorption (LM-) and 26.0% of malabsorbers had no symptoms (LS-). LS+ were significantly more likely to exhibit fructose sensitivity (45.2% vs. 24.2% in LS-, p < 0.001). DGBIs were similarly distributed in LS+ patients with and without malabsorption. Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome were significantly more frequent in LS+, irrespective of whether lactose was malabsorbed or not, than in those without lactose-induced symptoms (with or without malabsorption).

Conclusion: Lactose malabsorption alone is an inadequate predictor of the occurrence of symptoms, emphasizing the need for comprehensive symptom assessment beyond breath test results. This has important implications for the selection of appropriate therapies. The association between lactose and fructose sensitivity suggests a role for visceral hypersensitivity and overlapping mechanisms in symptom development.

超越吸收不良:需要对疑似乳糖不耐症进行基于症状的评估。特定测试症状评估的经验教训。
背景:乳糖吸收不良通常被认为是引起胃肠道不适,但尽管限制乳糖或补充酶,症状往往持续存在。目的:本研究旨在评估乳糖摄入后的症状,其与吸收不良的关系,以及与果糖敏感性和肠脑相互作用紊乱(DGBIs)的关系。设计:在753例连续的DGBIs患者中,我们进行了氢呼气试验,并使用经过验证的成人碳水化合物感知问卷(aCPQ)来评估乳糖诱导的症状。乳糖吸收不良(LM+)被定义为氢气增加bbb20 ppm。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测定乳糖致负重症状(LS+)的升高幅度(> ~ 20mm)。使用相同的方案评估了547名患者的果糖敏感性。结果:LM+占40.9%,LS+占55.4%。有趣的是,45.3%的有症状的患者没有乳糖吸收不良(LM-), 26.0%的吸收不良患者没有症状(LS-)。LS+组明显更容易表现出果糖敏感性(45.2% vs. 24.2%), p结论:单独的乳糖吸收不良不足以预测症状的发生,强调需要在呼气测试结果之外进行全面的症状评估。这对选择合适的治疗方法具有重要意义。乳糖和果糖敏感性之间的联系表明内脏超敏反应和重叠机制在症状发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信