Pain-relieving effect of dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis: a pilot crossover study.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kazuhiro Ikeda, Akira Ikumi, Shinzo Onishi, Takeshi Ogawa, Sho Kohyama, Yuichi Yoshii
{"title":"Pain-relieving effect of dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis: a pilot crossover study.","authors":"Kazuhiro Ikeda, Akira Ikumi, Shinzo Onishi, Takeshi Ogawa, Sho Kohyama, Yuichi Yoshii","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2561396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We developed a simple dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis (DOLE) assisting wrist extensors. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of DOLE and the counterforce brace in patients with lateral epicondylitis during pickup motion.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>Eighteen patients with lateral epicondylitis performed a pickup test using a 1 kg sandbag under three conditions: without a brace, with a counterforce brace, and with DOLE. Pain during the task was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The pain-relieving effect was calculated as the percentage reduction in VAS compared to baseline (without an orthosis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS in the pickup test was 63.2±18.8 mm without orthosis, 53.9±21.0 mm with the counterforce brace, and 38.9±17.0 mm with DOLE. The pain-relieving effect was 0.11 (0-0.20) for the counterforce brace and 0.38 (0.24-0.52) for DOLE, which was greater in DOLE than in the counterforce brace (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOLE significantly reduced lateral elbow pain during pickup motion, outperforming the counterforce brace; however, given the relatively small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence requiring confirmation in larger longitudinal studies. Its simple, worker-friendly design and strong pain-relief effect suggest its potential utility in treating lateral epicondylitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2561396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We developed a simple dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis (DOLE) assisting wrist extensors. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of DOLE and the counterforce brace in patients with lateral epicondylitis during pickup motion.

Patients & methods: Eighteen patients with lateral epicondylitis performed a pickup test using a 1 kg sandbag under three conditions: without a brace, with a counterforce brace, and with DOLE. Pain during the task was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The pain-relieving effect was calculated as the percentage reduction in VAS compared to baseline (without an orthosis).

Results: The VAS in the pickup test was 63.2±18.8 mm without orthosis, 53.9±21.0 mm with the counterforce brace, and 38.9±17.0 mm with DOLE. The pain-relieving effect was 0.11 (0-0.20) for the counterforce brace and 0.38 (0.24-0.52) for DOLE, which was greater in DOLE than in the counterforce brace (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: DOLE significantly reduced lateral elbow pain during pickup motion, outperforming the counterforce brace; however, given the relatively small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence requiring confirmation in larger longitudinal studies. Its simple, worker-friendly design and strong pain-relief effect suggest its potential utility in treating lateral epicondylitis.

动态矫形器治疗外侧上髁炎的镇痛效果:一项交叉试验研究。
目的:我们开发了一种简单的动态矫形器,用于辅助手腕伸肌治疗外侧上髁炎。本研究旨在比较DOLE和反力支具对外上髁炎患者提取运动时的疼痛缓解效果。患者和方法:18例外上髁炎患者在无支具、有反力支具和DOLE三种情况下,使用1 kg沙袋进行了拾取试验。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估任务期间的疼痛。疼痛缓解效果以VAS与基线(无矫形器)相比减少的百分比计算。结果:无矫形器时VAS为63.2±18.8 mm,有反力支时VAS为53.9±21.0 mm,有DOLE时VAS为38.9±17.0 mm。反力支具的镇痛效果为0.11 (0 ~ 0.20),DOLE组的镇痛效果为0.38(0.24 ~ 0.52),其中DOLE组优于反力支具(p = 0.001)。结论:DOLE明显减轻了取物运动时肘部外侧疼痛,优于反力支具;然而,由于样本量相对较小,这些发现应被解释为需要在更大规模的纵向研究中得到证实的初步证据。其简单,易于操作的设计和强烈的镇痛效果表明其在治疗外侧上髁炎的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信