Divergent neural mechanisms of selective attention in dichotic listening and binocular rivalry perception: Evidence from functional brain network analysis

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Xianqing Zeng , Yan Huang , Keyu Wang , Jiujiu Wang , Ming Meng
{"title":"Divergent neural mechanisms of selective attention in dichotic listening and binocular rivalry perception: Evidence from functional brain network analysis","authors":"Xianqing Zeng ,&nbsp;Yan Huang ,&nbsp;Keyu Wang ,&nbsp;Jiujiu Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although selective attention similarly modulates bistable perception in auditory and visual domains, its neural mechanisms remain unclear. Using fMRI within a naturalistic paradigm—dichotic listening (DL) with narrative stimuli and binocular rivalry (BR) with movie clips—we combined multiscale ICA-based brain network analysis (inter-/intra-subject correlation and dynamic FC) to investigate attentional mechanisms in DL and BR. In DL, when participants attended to the same narrative, the inter-SC of both right executive control network (RECN) and sensorimotor network (SMN) increased compared to when they attended to different narratives, indicating that the RECN and SMN were involved in the attentional mechanism of DL. Regardless of attentional content consistency, the auditory network (AudN) showed significant synchrony in both inter-SC and intra-SC analyses, suggesting stimulus-driven processing in DL. For BR, significant inter- and intra-SC were only observed in networks related to stimulus-driven processing, namely the higher visual network (HVN) and language network (LN), while no selective attention-related cognitive networks were identified. Furthermore, no dFC effects in the DL task were found. However, in the BR condition, the FC between the HVN and LN was significantly enhanced when attending to characters versus architecture, and the difference was robustly positively correlated with the difference in perceptual dominance duration of character-related movies between the two conditions. In summary, our results demonstrate that the modulation mechanisms of selective attention differ substantially between DL and BR. The former involves executive control, whereas the latter relies on neural circuits supporting perceptual processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 121464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925004677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although selective attention similarly modulates bistable perception in auditory and visual domains, its neural mechanisms remain unclear. Using fMRI within a naturalistic paradigm—dichotic listening (DL) with narrative stimuli and binocular rivalry (BR) with movie clips—we combined multiscale ICA-based brain network analysis (inter-/intra-subject correlation and dynamic FC) to investigate attentional mechanisms in DL and BR. In DL, when participants attended to the same narrative, the inter-SC of both right executive control network (RECN) and sensorimotor network (SMN) increased compared to when they attended to different narratives, indicating that the RECN and SMN were involved in the attentional mechanism of DL. Regardless of attentional content consistency, the auditory network (AudN) showed significant synchrony in both inter-SC and intra-SC analyses, suggesting stimulus-driven processing in DL. For BR, significant inter- and intra-SC were only observed in networks related to stimulus-driven processing, namely the higher visual network (HVN) and language network (LN), while no selective attention-related cognitive networks were identified. Furthermore, no dFC effects in the DL task were found. However, in the BR condition, the FC between the HVN and LN was significantly enhanced when attending to characters versus architecture, and the difference was robustly positively correlated with the difference in perceptual dominance duration of character-related movies between the two conditions. In summary, our results demonstrate that the modulation mechanisms of selective attention differ substantially between DL and BR. The former involves executive control, whereas the latter relies on neural circuits supporting perceptual processing.
二元听力和双眼竞争知觉中选择性注意的不同神经机制:来自功能性脑网络分析的证据。
虽然选择性注意在听觉和视觉领域类似地调节双稳态知觉,但其神经机制尚不清楚。利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)在自然主义范式——叙事刺激下的二元聆听(DL)和电影片段下的双目竞争(BR)——我们结合了基于多尺度ica的脑网络分析(主体间/主体内相关和动态FC)来研究DL和BR的注意机制。在深度学习中,当参与者听相同的叙述时,与听不同叙述时相比,右执行控制网络(RECN)和感觉运动网络(SMN)的sc间均有所增加,表明RECN和SMN参与了深度学习的注意机制。无论注意内容的一致性如何,听觉网络(AudN)在sc间和sc内的分析中都显示出显著的同步性,这表明DL是刺激驱动的加工。对于BR,仅在刺激驱动加工相关的高级视觉网络(HVN)和语言网络(LN)中观察到显著的sc间和sc内网络,而没有发现选择性注意相关的认知网络。此外,在DL任务中没有发现dFC效应。然而,在BR条件下,当关注角色与建筑时,HVN和LN之间的FC显著增强,且这一差异与两种条件下角色相关电影感知优势持续时间的差异呈显著正相关。总之,我们的研究结果表明,选择性注意的调节机制在DL和BR之间存在很大差异。前者涉及执行控制,而后者依赖于支持感知处理的神经回路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信