Testing the Clinical Significance of Third Trimester Uterine Artery Dopplers in Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Roopjit Sahi, Manesha Putra, Greggory R DeVore, John C Hobbins
{"title":"Testing the Clinical Significance of Third Trimester Uterine Artery Dopplers in Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction.","authors":"Roopjit Sahi, Manesha Putra, Greggory R DeVore, John C Hobbins","doi":"10.1002/jum.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the third trimester uterine artery Dopplers with other tools of fetal surveillance in prediction of in utero cardiac function measures and adverse neonatal outcomes in fetal growth-restricted pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnancies with severe or non-severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) (per SMFM guidelines) have been analyzed from an ongoing observational FGR study at a University of Colorado high-risk perinatal center. Fetal biometric values, Doppler indices, and cardiac variables were analyzed in both groups. Different Doppler combinations were tested to identify the best predictors for adverse fetal cardiac and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 102 FGR pregnancies, the incidence of abnormal uterine artery Dopplers was 27.5% in the non-severe FGR group and 25.8% in the severe FGR group. Abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) had a strong association with abnormal umbilical artery PI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.51 (1.32-16.2) (P = .01), and the cerebroplacental ratio had an inverse association with elevated uterine artery PI (OR 0.11, 0.01-0.69, P = .03). The odds of birthweight being less than 10th percentile with abnormal uterine artery PI was 9.2 (1.93-43.6, P = .005) in the non-severe FGR group. Fetuses in the severe FGR group with abnormal uterine artery PI had a higher incidence of rounder fetal hearts (OR 4.42, 1.09-17.9, P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although elevated uterine artery Dopplers are significantly associated with lower birthweight and rounder fetal hearts, the lack of strong correlation with other outcome variables indicates that the role of uterine artery Dopplers in fetal growth restriction needs further investigation in studies with a larger sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the third trimester uterine artery Dopplers with other tools of fetal surveillance in prediction of in utero cardiac function measures and adverse neonatal outcomes in fetal growth-restricted pregnancies.

Methods: Pregnancies with severe or non-severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) (per SMFM guidelines) have been analyzed from an ongoing observational FGR study at a University of Colorado high-risk perinatal center. Fetal biometric values, Doppler indices, and cardiac variables were analyzed in both groups. Different Doppler combinations were tested to identify the best predictors for adverse fetal cardiac and neonatal outcomes.

Results: In a cohort of 102 FGR pregnancies, the incidence of abnormal uterine artery Dopplers was 27.5% in the non-severe FGR group and 25.8% in the severe FGR group. Abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) had a strong association with abnormal umbilical artery PI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.51 (1.32-16.2) (P = .01), and the cerebroplacental ratio had an inverse association with elevated uterine artery PI (OR 0.11, 0.01-0.69, P = .03). The odds of birthweight being less than 10th percentile with abnormal uterine artery PI was 9.2 (1.93-43.6, P = .005) in the non-severe FGR group. Fetuses in the severe FGR group with abnormal uterine artery PI had a higher incidence of rounder fetal hearts (OR 4.42, 1.09-17.9, P = .03).

Conclusion: Although elevated uterine artery Dopplers are significantly associated with lower birthweight and rounder fetal hearts, the lack of strong correlation with other outcome variables indicates that the role of uterine artery Dopplers in fetal growth restriction needs further investigation in studies with a larger sample size.

胎儿生长受限妊娠晚期子宫动脉多普勒检测的临床意义。
目的:分析妊娠晚期子宫动脉多普勒与其他胎儿监测工具对胎儿生长受限妊娠的宫内心功能指标和新生儿不良结局的预测作用。方法:从科罗拉多大学高危围产期中心正在进行的一项观察性FGR研究中分析了严重或非严重胎儿生长受限(FGR)(根据SMFM指南)的妊娠。分析两组胎儿生物特征值、多普勒指数和心脏变量。试验了不同的多普勒组合,以确定胎儿心脏和新生儿不良结局的最佳预测因子。结果:102例FGR妊娠队列中,非重度FGR组子宫动脉多普勒异常发生率为27.5%,重度FGR组为25.8%。子宫动脉搏动指数(PI)异常与脐动脉搏动指数(PI)异常有较强的相关性,比值比(OR)为4.51 (1.32-16.2)(P =。0.01),脑胎盘比与子宫动脉PI升高呈负相关(OR 0.11, 0.01 ~ 0.69, P = 0.03)。出生体重小于10百分位且子宫动脉PI异常的几率为9.2 (1.93 ~ 43.6,P =。非严重FGR组(005)。重度FGR组子宫动脉PI异常胎心圆发生率较高(OR 4.42, 1.09 ~ 17.9, P = 0.03)。结论:虽然子宫动脉多普勒升高与低出生体重和胎心圆明显相关,但与其他结局变量相关性不强,提示子宫动脉多普勒在胎儿生长受限中的作用需要在更大样本量的研究中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信