EXPRESS: THE IMPACT OF HUMANOID ROBOT'S PRESENCE ON HUMAN'S COGNITIVE CONTROL IN A STOPSIGNAL TASK.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Giulia Siri, Abdulaziz Abubshait, Davide De Tommaso, Alessandro D'Ausilio, Agnieszka Wykowska
{"title":"EXPRESS: THE IMPACT OF HUMANOID ROBOT'S PRESENCE ON HUMAN'S COGNITIVE CONTROL IN A STOPSIGNAL TASK.","authors":"Giulia Siri, Abdulaziz Abubshait, Davide De Tommaso, Alessandro D'Ausilio, Agnieszka Wykowska","doi":"10.1177/17470218251383530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor inhibition - a key aspect of cognitive control - is crucial in interactive contexts, where partners must suppress and adjust actions for optimal coordination. Previous findings has showed that the presence of a human partner impair motor inhibition in joint action tasks. This study investigated whether a similar effect would occur when replacing the human partner with a humanoid robot. To do so, we conducted four experiments using a Stop-Signal Task: (1) a non-engaging robot condition, (2) an engaging robot condition, (3) an engaging robot with disabled cameras, and (4) a human partner condition. Results showed that humanoid robots do not impair motor inhibition, unlike human partners. Instead of increasing cognitive demands, the presence of a humanoid robot appeared to enhance attentional focus when perceived as monitoring, leading to improved motor inhibition. These findings suggest that humanoid robots can be integrated into joint action tasks without compromising cognitive control. Thus, we conclude that, if implemented ethically, robots could offer advantages in collaborative tasks where humans cannot, highlighting their potential for enhancing human performance in shared activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251383530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251383530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor inhibition - a key aspect of cognitive control - is crucial in interactive contexts, where partners must suppress and adjust actions for optimal coordination. Previous findings has showed that the presence of a human partner impair motor inhibition in joint action tasks. This study investigated whether a similar effect would occur when replacing the human partner with a humanoid robot. To do so, we conducted four experiments using a Stop-Signal Task: (1) a non-engaging robot condition, (2) an engaging robot condition, (3) an engaging robot with disabled cameras, and (4) a human partner condition. Results showed that humanoid robots do not impair motor inhibition, unlike human partners. Instead of increasing cognitive demands, the presence of a humanoid robot appeared to enhance attentional focus when perceived as monitoring, leading to improved motor inhibition. These findings suggest that humanoid robots can be integrated into joint action tasks without compromising cognitive control. Thus, we conclude that, if implemented ethically, robots could offer advantages in collaborative tasks where humans cannot, highlighting their potential for enhancing human performance in shared activities.

表达:人形机器人的存在对人类在停止信号任务中的认知控制的影响。
运动抑制——认知控制的一个关键方面——在互动环境中至关重要,在互动环境中,伙伴必须抑制和调整动作以达到最佳协调。先前的研究结果表明,在联合动作任务中,人类伴侣的存在会损害运动抑制。这项研究调查了当用人形机器人代替人类伴侣时是否会产生类似的效果。为此,我们使用停止信号任务进行了四项实验:(1)机器人不参与的情况,(2)机器人参与的情况,(3)带有禁用摄像头的机器人参与的情况,以及(4)人类伙伴的情况。结果表明,与人类伴侣不同,人形机器人不会损害运动抑制。人形机器人的存在并没有增加认知需求,而是在被视为监控时增强了注意力,从而改善了运动抑制。这些发现表明,人形机器人可以在不影响认知控制的情况下集成到联合行动任务中。因此,我们得出结论,如果在道德上实施,机器人可以在人类无法完成的协作任务中提供优势,突出它们在共享活动中提高人类表现的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信