The Effect of Resisted Sprint Training on Force-Velocity Profile Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Arjan Dougan, Christopher Latella, Tsuyoshi Nagatani, Robert G Lockie, Eleanor K O'Brien, G Gregory Haff
{"title":"The Effect of Resisted Sprint Training on Force-Velocity Profile Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Arjan Dougan, Christopher Latella, Tsuyoshi Nagatani, Robert G Lockie, Eleanor K O'Brien, G Gregory Haff","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Dougan, A, Latella, C, Nagatani, T, Lockie, RG, O'Brien, E, and Haff, GG. The effect of resisted sprint training on force-velocity profile change: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(10): e1265-e1277, 2025-This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of resisted sprint training (RST) compared with unresisted sprint training (URST) programs to positively influence horizontal force-velocity (F-V) profile variables and acceleration performance in trained individuals. Searches were conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus without year restriction. Included studies (a) used RST by towing/pushing a load as a training modality, (b) were published in a scientific journal, (c) were published in English, (d) were an original intervention, (e) measured pre- and postintervention horizontal F-V profiles, (f) identified training parameters including RST load used, (g) the training intervention was ≥4 weeks in duration or ≥8 sessions, and (h) included a control group that performed URST. After screening, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria. Raw data (mean ± SD or range) were extracted, and standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Resisted sprint training significantly improved force (SMD = 0.47, CI: [0.12-0.83], p = 0.002), power (SMD = 0.53 [0.17-0.88], p < 0.001), RFpeak (SMD = 0.70 [0.03-1.37], p = 0.029), and 5 m (SMD = -0.81 [-1.26 to 0.36], p < 0.001), 10 m (SMD = -0.80 [-1.39 to 0.21], p = 0.007), and 20 m sprint performance (SMD = -1.09 [-1.60 to 0.59], p < 0.001) during sprinting when compared with URST. Resisted sprint training represents an efficient means to increase key horizontal F-V profile variables. The findings suggest that RST may complement or be favored over URST to improve early-to-mid acceleration performance, horizontal force, or power, but further research is required in elite sprint athletes and to determine the effect that RST load and volume have on the adaptability of the F-V profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Dougan, A, Latella, C, Nagatani, T, Lockie, RG, O'Brien, E, and Haff, GG. The effect of resisted sprint training on force-velocity profile change: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(10): e1265-e1277, 2025-This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of resisted sprint training (RST) compared with unresisted sprint training (URST) programs to positively influence horizontal force-velocity (F-V) profile variables and acceleration performance in trained individuals. Searches were conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus without year restriction. Included studies (a) used RST by towing/pushing a load as a training modality, (b) were published in a scientific journal, (c) were published in English, (d) were an original intervention, (e) measured pre- and postintervention horizontal F-V profiles, (f) identified training parameters including RST load used, (g) the training intervention was ≥4 weeks in duration or ≥8 sessions, and (h) included a control group that performed URST. After screening, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria. Raw data (mean ± SD or range) were extracted, and standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Resisted sprint training significantly improved force (SMD = 0.47, CI: [0.12-0.83], p = 0.002), power (SMD = 0.53 [0.17-0.88], p < 0.001), RFpeak (SMD = 0.70 [0.03-1.37], p = 0.029), and 5 m (SMD = -0.81 [-1.26 to 0.36], p < 0.001), 10 m (SMD = -0.80 [-1.39 to 0.21], p = 0.007), and 20 m sprint performance (SMD = -1.09 [-1.60 to 0.59], p < 0.001) during sprinting when compared with URST. Resisted sprint training represents an efficient means to increase key horizontal F-V profile variables. The findings suggest that RST may complement or be favored over URST to improve early-to-mid acceleration performance, horizontal force, or power, but further research is required in elite sprint athletes and to determine the effect that RST load and volume have on the adaptability of the F-V profile.

抗跑训练对力-速度剖面变化的影响:系统回顾与元分析。
[摘要]Dougan, A, Latella, C, Nagatani, T, Lockie, RG, O'Brien, E, Haff, GG.阻力冲刺训练对力-速度分布变化的影响:系统回顾和meta分析。[J] .体能与运动杂志,2009,29(10):1265- 1277 - 2025-本荟萃分析评估了抗阻冲刺训练(RST)与非抗阻冲刺训练(URST)方案对训练个体水平力-速度(F-V)曲线变量和加速性能的正向影响。搜索通过PubMed, Web of Science和SPORTDiscus进行,没有年份限制。纳入的研究(a)采用牵引/推动负荷的RST作为训练方式,(b)发表在科学期刊上,(c)以英文发表,(d)是原始干预,(e)测量干预前和干预后的水平f - v曲线,(f)确定训练参数,包括使用的RST负荷,(g)训练干预持续时间≥4周或≥8次,(h)包括进行URST的对照组。经筛选,7项研究符合纳入标准。提取原始数据(mean±SD或range),并计算所有结果的标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。p < 0.05为显著性。与URST相比,抗跑训练显著提高了5米(SMD = -0.81 [-1.26 ~ 0.36], p < 0.001)、10米(SMD = -0.80 [-1.39 ~ 0.21], p = 0.007)、5米(SMD = -1.09 [-1.60 ~ 0.59], p < 0.001)、力量(SMD = 0.47, CI: [0.12 ~ 0.83], p = 0.002)、功率(SMD = 0.53 [0.17 ~ 0.88], p < 0.001)、RFpeak (SMD = 0.70 [0.03 ~ 1.37], p = 0.029)。抵抗冲刺训练是增加关键水平F-V剖面变量的有效手段。研究结果表明,RST可能补充或优于URST,以提高早中期加速性能,水平力或功率,但需要在精英短跑运动员中进一步研究,并确定RST负荷和体积对F-V曲线适应性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信