Transitions in dynamical regime and neural mode during perceptual decisions.

IF 48.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nature Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1038/s41586-025-09528-4
Thomas Zhihao Luo, Timothy Doyeon Kim, Diksha Gupta, Adrian G Bondy, Charles D Kopec, Verity A Elliott, Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody
{"title":"Transitions in dynamical regime and neural mode during perceptual decisions.","authors":"Thomas Zhihao Luo, Timothy Doyeon Kim, Diksha Gupta, Adrian G Bondy, Charles D Kopec, Verity A Elliott, Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody","doi":"10.1038/s41586-025-09528-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceptual decision-making is thought to be mediated by neuronal networks with attractor dynamics<sup>1,2</sup>. However, the dynamics underlying the complex neuronal responses during decision-making remain unclear. Here we use simultaneous recordings of hundreds of neurons, combined with an unsupervised, deep-learning-based method, to discover decision-related neural dynamics in the rat frontal cortex and striatum as animals accumulate pulsatile auditory evidence. We found that trajectories evolved along two sequential regimes: an initial phase dominated by sensory inputs, followed by a phase dominated by autonomous dynamics, with the flow direction (that is, neural mode) largely orthogonal to that in the first regime. We propose that this transition marks the moment of decision commitment, that is, the time when the animal makes up its mind. To test this, we developed a simplified model of the dynamics to estimate a putative neurally inferred time of commitment (nTc) for each trial. This model captures diverse single-neuron temporal profiles, such as ramping and stepping<sup>3,4</sup>. The estimated nTc values were not time locked to stimulus or response timing but instead varied broadly across trials. If nTc marks commitment, evidence before this point should affect the decision, whereas evidence afterwards should not. Behavioural analysis aligned to nTc confirmed this prediction. Our findings show that decision commitment involves a rapid, coordinated transition in dynamical regime and neural mode and suggest that nTc offers a useful neural marker for studying rapid changes in internal brain state.</p>","PeriodicalId":18787,"journal":{"name":"Nature","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":48.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09528-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceptual decision-making is thought to be mediated by neuronal networks with attractor dynamics1,2. However, the dynamics underlying the complex neuronal responses during decision-making remain unclear. Here we use simultaneous recordings of hundreds of neurons, combined with an unsupervised, deep-learning-based method, to discover decision-related neural dynamics in the rat frontal cortex and striatum as animals accumulate pulsatile auditory evidence. We found that trajectories evolved along two sequential regimes: an initial phase dominated by sensory inputs, followed by a phase dominated by autonomous dynamics, with the flow direction (that is, neural mode) largely orthogonal to that in the first regime. We propose that this transition marks the moment of decision commitment, that is, the time when the animal makes up its mind. To test this, we developed a simplified model of the dynamics to estimate a putative neurally inferred time of commitment (nTc) for each trial. This model captures diverse single-neuron temporal profiles, such as ramping and stepping3,4. The estimated nTc values were not time locked to stimulus or response timing but instead varied broadly across trials. If nTc marks commitment, evidence before this point should affect the decision, whereas evidence afterwards should not. Behavioural analysis aligned to nTc confirmed this prediction. Our findings show that decision commitment involves a rapid, coordinated transition in dynamical regime and neural mode and suggest that nTc offers a useful neural marker for studying rapid changes in internal brain state.

知觉决策过程中动力机制和神经模式的转变。
知觉决策被认为是由具有吸引子动态的神经网络介导的1,2。然而,决策过程中复杂的神经元反应背后的动力机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们使用数百个神经元的同时记录,结合一种无监督的、基于深度学习的方法,来发现大鼠额叶皮层和纹状体中与决策相关的神经动力学,因为动物积累了脉动听觉证据。我们发现轨迹沿着两个顺序的机制进化:一个由感官输入主导的初始阶段,随后是一个由自主动力学主导的阶段,流动方向(即神经模式)在很大程度上与第一个机制正交。我们认为,这种转变标志着做出决定的时刻,也就是动物下定决心的时刻。为了验证这一点,我们开发了一个简化的动力学模型来估计每次试验的假定神经推断承诺时间(nTc)。该模型捕获了不同的单神经元时间分布,如斜坡和阶梯3,4。估计的nTc值不受刺激或反应时间的限制,而是在不同的试验中变化很大。如果nTc标志着承诺,在此之前的证据应该影响决定,而在此之后的证据则不应该影响决定。与nTc一致的行为分析证实了这一预测。我们的研究结果表明,决策承诺涉及动态机制和神经模式的快速协调转变,并表明nTc为研究大脑内部状态的快速变化提供了有用的神经标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature
Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
90.00
自引率
1.20%
发文量
3652
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Nature is a prestigious international journal that publishes peer-reviewed research in various scientific and technological fields. The selection of articles is based on criteria such as originality, importance, interdisciplinary relevance, timeliness, accessibility, elegance, and surprising conclusions. In addition to showcasing significant scientific advances, Nature delivers rapid, authoritative, insightful news, and interpretation of current and upcoming trends impacting science, scientists, and the broader public. The journal serves a dual purpose: firstly, to promptly share noteworthy scientific advances and foster discussions among scientists, and secondly, to ensure the swift dissemination of scientific results globally, emphasizing their significance for knowledge, culture, and daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信