Surgical Technique for Anterolateral Thigh Flap Harvesting-A Questionnaire Study from 263 International Microsurgeons.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Joachim N Meuli, Shiuan Shyu, Yu-Ting Chen, Elzat Elham, Lisa Wen-Yu Chen, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Jung-Ju Huang, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang
{"title":"Surgical Technique for Anterolateral Thigh Flap Harvesting-A Questionnaire Study from 263 International Microsurgeons.","authors":"Joachim N Meuli, Shiuan Shyu, Yu-Ting Chen, Elzat Elham, Lisa Wen-Yu Chen, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Jung-Ju Huang, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang","doi":"10.1055/a-2702-4225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a very popular perforator flap but variations in design and in harvest techniques result in a broad spectrum of approaches that considerably differ from literature descriptions. We therefore designed this study to assess the differences in surgical techniques and practice preferences toward this flap across world regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted via an online questionnaire covering demographic data, surgical techniques and preferences in 21 questions. The participants were divided in 6 geographical regions that were compared. Two questions that are the subject of debate amongst microsurgeons (limitation of vasopressor use and anticoagulation before flap division) were further analyzed using a logistic regression in order to identify predicting variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 263 respondents worldwide with notable differences in demographics, experience, level and technique across different world regions. The main differences were noted in intraoperative evaluation of perforators, in the primary instrument for dissection, and in the use of loupe magnification. Microsurgeons in North-America and with limited experience were more likely to limit vasopressor use during flap harvest. There were also discrepancies regarding the use of systemic anticoagulation prior to flap division but not of the same magnitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first attempt to offer a clinical reference to apprehend differences in surgical preferences regarding ALT flap harvest techniques. Vasopressor use is notably limited by microsurgeons in North-America as well as by less experienced microsurgeons against available clinical evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2702-4225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a very popular perforator flap but variations in design and in harvest techniques result in a broad spectrum of approaches that considerably differ from literature descriptions. We therefore designed this study to assess the differences in surgical techniques and practice preferences toward this flap across world regions.

Methods: The study was conducted via an online questionnaire covering demographic data, surgical techniques and preferences in 21 questions. The participants were divided in 6 geographical regions that were compared. Two questions that are the subject of debate amongst microsurgeons (limitation of vasopressor use and anticoagulation before flap division) were further analyzed using a logistic regression in order to identify predicting variables.

Results: There were 263 respondents worldwide with notable differences in demographics, experience, level and technique across different world regions. The main differences were noted in intraoperative evaluation of perforators, in the primary instrument for dissection, and in the use of loupe magnification. Microsurgeons in North-America and with limited experience were more likely to limit vasopressor use during flap harvest. There were also discrepancies regarding the use of systemic anticoagulation prior to flap division but not of the same magnitude.

Conclusion: This study is the first attempt to offer a clinical reference to apprehend differences in surgical preferences regarding ALT flap harvest techniques. Vasopressor use is notably limited by microsurgeons in North-America as well as by less experienced microsurgeons against available clinical evidence.

263名国际显微外科医生对股前外侧皮瓣采集手术技术的问卷调查。
背景:大腿前外侧皮瓣(ALT)是一种非常流行的穿支皮瓣,但设计和收获技术的变化导致了广泛的方法,与文献描述有很大的不同。因此,我们设计了这项研究,以评估世界各地对该皮瓣的手术技术和实践偏好的差异。方法:通过在线问卷调查进行研究,问卷内容包括人口统计资料、手术技术和患者偏好等21个问题。参与者被划分在6个地理区域进行比较。为了确定预测变量,我们使用逻辑回归进一步分析了显微外科医生争论的两个问题(血管加压药物使用的限制和皮瓣分割前的抗凝)。结果:全球共有263名受访者,在人口统计学、经验、水平和技术方面存在显著差异。主要的差异是术中对穿支的评估,主要的解剖工具,以及放大镜的使用。北美经验有限的显微外科医生更有可能在皮瓣摘取时限制血管加压药的使用。在皮瓣分裂前使用全身抗凝方面也存在差异,但差异的程度不同。结论:本研究首次尝试为了解ALT皮瓣摘取技术的手术偏好差异提供临床参考。血管加压素的使用在北美的显微外科医生以及缺乏经验的显微外科医生中受到明显限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信