Joachim N Meuli, Shiuan Shyu, Yu-Ting Chen, Elzat Elham, Lisa Wen-Yu Chen, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Jung-Ju Huang, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang
{"title":"Surgical Technique for Anterolateral Thigh Flap Harvesting-A Questionnaire Study from 263 International Microsurgeons.","authors":"Joachim N Meuli, Shiuan Shyu, Yu-Ting Chen, Elzat Elham, Lisa Wen-Yu Chen, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Jung-Ju Huang, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang","doi":"10.1055/a-2702-4225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a very popular perforator flap but variations in design and in harvest techniques result in a broad spectrum of approaches that considerably differ from literature descriptions. We therefore designed this study to assess the differences in surgical techniques and practice preferences toward this flap across world regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted via an online questionnaire covering demographic data, surgical techniques and preferences in 21 questions. The participants were divided in 6 geographical regions that were compared. Two questions that are the subject of debate amongst microsurgeons (limitation of vasopressor use and anticoagulation before flap division) were further analyzed using a logistic regression in order to identify predicting variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 263 respondents worldwide with notable differences in demographics, experience, level and technique across different world regions. The main differences were noted in intraoperative evaluation of perforators, in the primary instrument for dissection, and in the use of loupe magnification. Microsurgeons in North-America and with limited experience were more likely to limit vasopressor use during flap harvest. There were also discrepancies regarding the use of systemic anticoagulation prior to flap division but not of the same magnitude.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first attempt to offer a clinical reference to apprehend differences in surgical preferences regarding ALT flap harvest techniques. Vasopressor use is notably limited by microsurgeons in North-America as well as by less experienced microsurgeons against available clinical evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2702-4225","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a very popular perforator flap but variations in design and in harvest techniques result in a broad spectrum of approaches that considerably differ from literature descriptions. We therefore designed this study to assess the differences in surgical techniques and practice preferences toward this flap across world regions.
Methods: The study was conducted via an online questionnaire covering demographic data, surgical techniques and preferences in 21 questions. The participants were divided in 6 geographical regions that were compared. Two questions that are the subject of debate amongst microsurgeons (limitation of vasopressor use and anticoagulation before flap division) were further analyzed using a logistic regression in order to identify predicting variables.
Results: There were 263 respondents worldwide with notable differences in demographics, experience, level and technique across different world regions. The main differences were noted in intraoperative evaluation of perforators, in the primary instrument for dissection, and in the use of loupe magnification. Microsurgeons in North-America and with limited experience were more likely to limit vasopressor use during flap harvest. There were also discrepancies regarding the use of systemic anticoagulation prior to flap division but not of the same magnitude.
Conclusion: This study is the first attempt to offer a clinical reference to apprehend differences in surgical preferences regarding ALT flap harvest techniques. Vasopressor use is notably limited by microsurgeons in North-America as well as by less experienced microsurgeons against available clinical evidence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.