Population Assessment of Anatomic Eligibility for Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jacquelyn M Roth, Maxwell Godek, Ethan Fung, Reanna Shah, Bernice Yu, Areeg A E Hawa, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Kagen, Alice Yao, Peter W Henderson
{"title":"Population Assessment of Anatomic Eligibility for Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap.","authors":"Jacquelyn M Roth, Maxwell Godek, Ethan Fung, Reanna Shah, Bernice Yu, Areeg A E Hawa, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Kagen, Alice Yao, Peter W Henderson","doi":"10.1055/a-2702-4021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compared with traditional deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction procedures, robotic-assisted DIEP (R-DIEP) minimizes abdominal wall morbidity by reducing fascial incision length. Optimal R-DIEP candidates have large perforators with short intramuscular courses, but no large-scale studies have quantified their prevalence. This study aims to identify the proportion of patients who are anatomically eligible for R-DIEP.A retrospective review of patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography perforator mapping prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2023 was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. \"Dominant perforator\" was defined as the largest perforator at or below the level of the umbilicus. The intramuscular course of each perforator was calculated as the hypotenuse of a theoretical prism connecting its entry and exit points with respect to the rectus abdominis muscle. Perforator diameter was measured at the anterior rectus sheath. \"Conservative\" (intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm) and \"liberal\" (intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm) eligibility criteria were applied. Perforator diameter > 2 mm was used as a secondary criterion.A total of 574 dominant perforators were identified in 287 patients. The average intramuscular length of each perforator was 3.8 ± 1.9 cm (range: 0-11.0 cm). Twenty-nine percent of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 165) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 2.5 cm, 77% (<i>n</i> = 441) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 5 cm, and 2.3% (<i>n</i> = 13) were paramuscular (no intramuscular course). Forty-six percent of patients (<i>n</i> = 132) had at least one dominant perforator (i.e., left- or right-sided) with an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 93% of patients (<i>n</i> = 268) had at least one dominant perforator with an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm. Thirty-one percent of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 185) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 49% of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 281) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm.A substantial portion of the population is anatomically eligible for R-DIEP breast reconstruction, especially when liberal criteria are applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2702-4021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared with traditional deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction procedures, robotic-assisted DIEP (R-DIEP) minimizes abdominal wall morbidity by reducing fascial incision length. Optimal R-DIEP candidates have large perforators with short intramuscular courses, but no large-scale studies have quantified their prevalence. This study aims to identify the proportion of patients who are anatomically eligible for R-DIEP.A retrospective review of patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography perforator mapping prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2023 was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. "Dominant perforator" was defined as the largest perforator at or below the level of the umbilicus. The intramuscular course of each perforator was calculated as the hypotenuse of a theoretical prism connecting its entry and exit points with respect to the rectus abdominis muscle. Perforator diameter was measured at the anterior rectus sheath. "Conservative" (intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm) and "liberal" (intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm) eligibility criteria were applied. Perforator diameter > 2 mm was used as a secondary criterion.A total of 574 dominant perforators were identified in 287 patients. The average intramuscular length of each perforator was 3.8 ± 1.9 cm (range: 0-11.0 cm). Twenty-nine percent of dominant perforators (n = 165) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 2.5 cm, 77% (n = 441) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 5 cm, and 2.3% (n = 13) were paramuscular (no intramuscular course). Forty-six percent of patients (n = 132) had at least one dominant perforator (i.e., left- or right-sided) with an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 93% of patients (n = 268) had at least one dominant perforator with an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm. Thirty-one percent of dominant perforators (n = 185) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 49% of dominant perforators (n = 281) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm.A substantial portion of the population is anatomically eligible for R-DIEP breast reconstruction, especially when liberal criteria are applied.

机器人辅助DIEP皮瓣摘取解剖资格的人群评估。
背景:与传统的上腹部深下穿支(DIEP)皮瓣乳房重建手术相比,机器人辅助的DIEP (R-DIEP)通过减少筋膜切口长度将腹壁发病率降至最低。最佳的R-DIEP候选者有大的穿支和短的肌内病程,但没有大规模的研究量化它们的患病率。目前的研究旨在确定解剖上符合R-DIEP的患者比例。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2023年期间在DIEP皮瓣乳房重建前接受磁共振血管造影(MRA)穿支定位的患者。收集患者的人口统计资料。“优势穿孔”被定义为位于脐或脐以下的最大穿孔。每个穿支的肌内路线被计算为一个理论棱镜的斜边,连接它的入口和出口点,相对于腹直肌。在前直肌鞘处测量穿支直径。采用“保守”(肌内病程≤2.5cm)和“自由”(肌内病程≤5cm)的入选标准。射孔器直径>2mm作为次要标准。结果:287例患者中发现优势穿支574支。每根穿支肌内平均长度为3.8±1.9 cm(范围:0 ~ 11.0 cm)。29% (n=165)的优势穿支肌内病程长度≤2.5cm, 77% (n=441)的优势穿支肌内病程长度≤5cm, 2.3% (n=13)的优势穿支肌旁病程(无肌内病程)。46%的患者(n=132)至少有一个优势穿支(即左侧或右侧),肌内病程≤2.5cm, 93%的患者(n=268)至少有一个优势穿支,肌内病程≤5cm, 31%的优势穿支(n=185)直径>2mm,肌内病程≤2.5cm, 49%的优势穿支(n=281)直径>2mm,肌内病程≤5cm。结论:很大一部分人在解剖学上符合R-DIEP乳房重建的条件,特别是在应用自由标准时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信