Occlusal accuracy of digitally manufactured removable dentures: a systematic review of in vitro studies

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Xiaoxia Wang , Andrew B. Cameron , Nicholas C․K. Heng , John M. Aarts , Joanne J․E Choi
{"title":"Occlusal accuracy of digitally manufactured removable dentures: a systematic review of in vitro studies","authors":"Xiaoxia Wang ,&nbsp;Andrew B. Cameron ,&nbsp;Nicholas C․K. Heng ,&nbsp;John M. Aarts ,&nbsp;Joanne J․E Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the occlusal accuracy of digitally manufactured removable dentures compared to conventional fabrication, and to identify key influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE(R), Scopus, and Web of Science (All Databases), was conducted up to December 2024, supplemented by manual searches in reference lists and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English, available in full text, and investigated the occlusal accuracy of digitally manufactured removable dentures in vitro. Studies were excluded if they lacked a method to assess the accuracy of denture teeth, tooth sockets, or occlusal surfaces. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Digitally manufactured removable dentures, particularly subtractively manufactured dentures, demonstrated superior occlusal accuracy compared to conventional dentures. Additive manufacturing showed promising results but was influenced by layer thickness (100 µm outperformed 50 µm in DLP, whereas 50 µm was superior in SLA), build orientation (0° outperformed 90°, which outperformed 45°), and post-processing protocols (post-curing of dentures on casts). Optimal denture base-tooth offset values (0.05–0.25 mm, tooth-type dependent), tooth basal shapes (projections/dimples), and monolithic designs enhanced accuracy, while teeth positioning keys did not improve outcomes. Methodological heterogeneity, including variations in specimen shapes and measurement techniques, was noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Digital workflows, especially subtractive manufacturing, offer significant advantages in enhancing the occlusal accuracy of removable dentures. Key factors such as design schemes, manufacturing parameters, post-processing protocols, and bonding strategies critically influence outcomes. Standardized research methodologies are needed to facilitate cross-study comparisons. Future studies should explore the impact of palatal morphology, specimen pre-treatment, post-washing parameters, and the accuracy of digitally manufactured removable partial dentures.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Significance</h3><div>Digital removable dentures have superior occlusal accuracy compared to conventionally made dentures. Standardized workflow and analysis method for occlusal accuracy need further study and development to provide clinically relevant information to dental practitioners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 106110"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225005561","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the occlusal accuracy of digitally manufactured removable dentures compared to conventional fabrication, and to identify key influencing factors.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of Ovid MEDLINE(R), Scopus, and Web of Science (All Databases), was conducted up to December 2024, supplemented by manual searches in reference lists and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed, published in English, available in full text, and investigated the occlusal accuracy of digitally manufactured removable dentures in vitro. Studies were excluded if they lacked a method to assess the accuracy of denture teeth, tooth sockets, or occlusal surfaces. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies.

Results

Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Digitally manufactured removable dentures, particularly subtractively manufactured dentures, demonstrated superior occlusal accuracy compared to conventional dentures. Additive manufacturing showed promising results but was influenced by layer thickness (100 µm outperformed 50 µm in DLP, whereas 50 µm was superior in SLA), build orientation (0° outperformed 90°, which outperformed 45°), and post-processing protocols (post-curing of dentures on casts). Optimal denture base-tooth offset values (0.05–0.25 mm, tooth-type dependent), tooth basal shapes (projections/dimples), and monolithic designs enhanced accuracy, while teeth positioning keys did not improve outcomes. Methodological heterogeneity, including variations in specimen shapes and measurement techniques, was noted.

Conclusions

Digital workflows, especially subtractive manufacturing, offer significant advantages in enhancing the occlusal accuracy of removable dentures. Key factors such as design schemes, manufacturing parameters, post-processing protocols, and bonding strategies critically influence outcomes. Standardized research methodologies are needed to facilitate cross-study comparisons. Future studies should explore the impact of palatal morphology, specimen pre-treatment, post-washing parameters, and the accuracy of digitally manufactured removable partial dentures.

Clinical Significance

Digital removable dentures have superior occlusal accuracy compared to conventionally made dentures. Standardized workflow and analysis method for occlusal accuracy need further study and development to provide clinically relevant information to dental practitioners.
数字制造活动义齿的咬合准确性:体外研究的系统回顾。
目的:评价数字义齿与传统义齿的咬合精度,并探讨影响数字义齿咬合精度的关键因素。方法:全面检索截至2024年12月的Ovid MEDLINE(R)、Scopus和Web of Science (All Databases)的文献,并辅以人工检索参考文献列表和谷歌Scholar。符合条件的研究经过同行评审,以英文发表,全文可用,并调查了数字制造的体外可摘义齿的咬合准确性。如果缺乏评估义齿、牙套或咬合面准确性的方法,则排除研究。使用体外研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险。结果:21项研究符合纳入标准。数字制造的可移动义齿,特别是减法制造的义齿,与传统义齿相比,显示出优越的咬合精度。增材制造显示出令人满意的结果,但受层厚度(100µm的DLP优于50µm,而50 µm的SLA优于50µm)、构建方向(0°优于90°,90°优于45°)和后处理方案(铸造义齿的后固化)的影响。最佳义齿基托-牙偏置值(0.05-0.25 mm,取决于牙型)、牙基托形状(凸出/凹陷)和整体设计提高了准确性,而牙定位键没有改善结果。方法的异质性,包括试样形状和测量技术的变化,被注意到。结论:数字化工作流程,特别是减法制造,在提高可摘义齿咬合精度方面具有显著优势。关键因素,如设计方案,制造参数,后处理协议和键合策略的关键影响结果。需要标准化的研究方法来促进交叉研究的比较。未来的研究应探讨腭形态、标本预处理、洗后参数和数字制造可摘局部义齿精度的影响。临床意义:与传统义齿相比,数字可摘义齿具有更好的咬合精度。规范化的咬合准确性工作流程和分析方法有待进一步研究和发展,以便为牙科医生提供临床相关信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信