Diagnostic and prognostic comparison of stress ECG, CMR and SPECT, alone and sequentially, in stable chest pain.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Giandomenico Bisaccia, Peter P Swoboda, John F Younger, Neil Maredia, Catherine J Dickinson, Julia M Brown, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Sven Plein, John P Greenwood
{"title":"Diagnostic and prognostic comparison of stress ECG, CMR and SPECT, alone and sequentially, in stable chest pain.","authors":"Giandomenico Bisaccia, Peter P Swoboda, John F Younger, Neil Maredia, Catherine J Dickinson, Julia M Brown, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Sven Plein, John P Greenwood","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise ECG remains widely performed in the assessment of patients with suspected cardiac chest pain. We aimed to assess the comparative diagnostic and prognostic yield of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in a large prospective patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients recruited to CE-MARC who had exercise ECG were included and followed up to a median(IQR) of 6.3(0.1,6.8) years. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC) for diagnostic accuracy were derived and hazard ratios of MACE for prognostic significance calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 752 patients in the CE-MARC trial, 580 had exercise ECG and invasive coronary angiography, of which 503 also had SPECT and CMR. At follow-up, a total of 91(15.7%) patients experienced MACE. Using invasive angiography as the reference test, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV(95%CI) of exercise ECG were 68.3(61.9,74.0), 72.5(67.6,76.9), 61.0(54.8,66.8), 78.4(73.7,82.5). Exercise ECG was significantly less sensitive than CMR and less specific than both CMR and SPECT. A positive exercise ECG result was not predictive of MACE at follow-up (HR 1.14[0.75,1.72], p=0.53). CMR had both a greater diagnostic and prognostic yield than exercise ECG, SPECT and their combination. Sequential CMR following inconclusive exercise ECG was comparable to CMR alone as the first-line test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with suspected angina, CMR alone as the first-line test was more sensitive and prognostically accurate than exercise ECG, SPECT, or sequential combination of both tests.</p><p><strong>Condensed abstract: </strong>In a real-world head-to-head comparison study for diagnostic accuracy and prognostic yield, a strategy of CMR alone outperformed SPECT and exercise ECG, as well as their combination, in patients with stable chest pain. Use of CMR following an inconclusive exercise ECG was superior to use of SPECT, and comparable to a strategy of CMR alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101960"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise ECG remains widely performed in the assessment of patients with suspected cardiac chest pain. We aimed to assess the comparative diagnostic and prognostic yield of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in a large prospective patient population.

Methods: Patients recruited to CE-MARC who had exercise ECG were included and followed up to a median(IQR) of 6.3(0.1,6.8) years. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC) for diagnostic accuracy were derived and hazard ratios of MACE for prognostic significance calculated.

Results: Of 752 patients in the CE-MARC trial, 580 had exercise ECG and invasive coronary angiography, of which 503 also had SPECT and CMR. At follow-up, a total of 91(15.7%) patients experienced MACE. Using invasive angiography as the reference test, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV(95%CI) of exercise ECG were 68.3(61.9,74.0), 72.5(67.6,76.9), 61.0(54.8,66.8), 78.4(73.7,82.5). Exercise ECG was significantly less sensitive than CMR and less specific than both CMR and SPECT. A positive exercise ECG result was not predictive of MACE at follow-up (HR 1.14[0.75,1.72], p=0.53). CMR had both a greater diagnostic and prognostic yield than exercise ECG, SPECT and their combination. Sequential CMR following inconclusive exercise ECG was comparable to CMR alone as the first-line test.

Conclusions: In patients with suspected angina, CMR alone as the first-line test was more sensitive and prognostically accurate than exercise ECG, SPECT, or sequential combination of both tests.

Condensed abstract: In a real-world head-to-head comparison study for diagnostic accuracy and prognostic yield, a strategy of CMR alone outperformed SPECT and exercise ECG, as well as their combination, in patients with stable chest pain. Use of CMR following an inconclusive exercise ECG was superior to use of SPECT, and comparable to a strategy of CMR alone.

稳定型胸痛的应激心电图、CMR和SPECT单独和顺序诊断和预后比较。
背景:运动心电图仍然广泛用于评估疑似心源性胸痛患者。我们的目的是评估运动心电图、单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和心血管磁共振(CMR)在大量前瞻性患者群体中的比较诊断和预后效果。方法:纳入CE-MARC招募的有运动心电图的患者,随访中位(IQR)为6.3(0.1,6.8)年。得出诊断准确性的敏感性、特异性、阳性(PPV)和阴性(NPV)预测值和曲线下面积(AUC),并计算MACE对预后意义的风险比。结果:752例CE-MARC试验患者中,580例有运动心电图和有创冠状动脉造影,其中503例同时有SPECT和CMR。在随访中,共有91例(15.7%)患者经历了MACE。以有创血管造影为参考试验,运动心电图的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV(95%CI)分别为68.3(61.9,74.0)、72.5(67.6,76.9)、61.0(54.8,66.8)、78.4(73.7,82.5)。运动心电图的敏感性明显低于CMR,特异性明显低于CMR和SPECT。运动心电图阳性不能预测随访时MACE的发生(HR 1.14[0.75,1.72], p=0.53)。CMR的诊断和预后率均高于运动心电图、SPECT及其组合。不确定运动心电图后序贯CMR与单独CMR作为一线试验相当。结论:在疑似心绞痛患者中,CMR单独作为一线检查比运动心电图、SPECT或两项检查的顺序组合更敏感,预后更准确。摘要:在一项真实世界的诊断准确性和预后率的对比研究中,CMR单独的策略在稳定胸痛患者中优于SPECT和运动ECG,以及它们的组合。在不确定的运动心电图后使用CMR优于使用SPECT,并且与单独使用CMR策略相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信