Establishing Priorities for the Effective Implementation of Tobacco Control Program at National and Subnational Level in India: A Delphi Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sonu Goel, Diksha Walia, Prakash Chandra Gupta, Rana Jugdeep Singh, Leimapokpam Swasticharan
{"title":"Establishing Priorities for the Effective Implementation of Tobacco Control Program at National and Subnational Level in India: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Sonu Goel, Diksha Walia, Prakash Chandra Gupta, Rana Jugdeep Singh, Leimapokpam Swasticharan","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_126_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India faces unique challenges in tobacco control, with 266.8 million adults using tobacco. Despite these challenges, the country has made progress with the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP). Effective execution of these policies is crucial to combat the growing tobacco epidemic. This study aims to establish consensus on national and subnational NTCP priorities using a modified Delphi technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-stage modified Delphi process involved 21 experts from government, nongovernmental organizations, and academia. In the first stage, experts identified key tobacco control priorities. In the second stage, they rated these priorities on a Likert scale (0-4), and the top 10 were determined using a weighted mean. The final stage included an in-depth discussion and ranking of these top priorities by the expert panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the initial round, experts proposed 20 national and 17 subnational priorities, which were then rated and ranked to achieve consensus on the top 10 for each level. The top three national priorities identified were amending the National Tobacco Control Legislation (COTPA), monitoring NTCP implementation, and protecting health policy from tobacco industry interference. The top three subnational priorities were: enforcing COTPA and the e-cigarette ban (PECA), engaging civil society in tobacco control efforts, and promoting tobacco-free schools and villages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While national policies and legislation are vital for strengthening the overall tobacco control framework, effective implementation and enforcement at both national and subnational levels are essential for curbing the tobacco menace in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_126_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: India faces unique challenges in tobacco control, with 266.8 million adults using tobacco. Despite these challenges, the country has made progress with the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP). Effective execution of these policies is crucial to combat the growing tobacco epidemic. This study aims to establish consensus on national and subnational NTCP priorities using a modified Delphi technique.

Methods: A three-stage modified Delphi process involved 21 experts from government, nongovernmental organizations, and academia. In the first stage, experts identified key tobacco control priorities. In the second stage, they rated these priorities on a Likert scale (0-4), and the top 10 were determined using a weighted mean. The final stage included an in-depth discussion and ranking of these top priorities by the expert panel.

Results: In the initial round, experts proposed 20 national and 17 subnational priorities, which were then rated and ranked to achieve consensus on the top 10 for each level. The top three national priorities identified were amending the National Tobacco Control Legislation (COTPA), monitoring NTCP implementation, and protecting health policy from tobacco industry interference. The top three subnational priorities were: enforcing COTPA and the e-cigarette ban (PECA), engaging civil society in tobacco control efforts, and promoting tobacco-free schools and villages.

Conclusions: While national policies and legislation are vital for strengthening the overall tobacco control framework, effective implementation and enforcement at both national and subnational levels are essential for curbing the tobacco menace in India.

在印度国家和国家以下各级确定有效实施烟草控制规划的优先事项:德尔菲研究。
背景:印度在烟草控制方面面临独特挑战,有2.668亿成年人使用烟草。尽管存在这些挑战,该国在国家烟草控制规划方面取得了进展。有效执行这些政策对于遏制日益严重的烟草流行至关重要。本研究旨在利用改进的德尔菲技术建立关于国家和地方NTCP优先事项的共识。方法:21名来自政府、非政府组织和学术界的专家参与了三阶段改进的德尔菲过程。在第一阶段,专家们确定了主要的烟草控制重点。在第二阶段,他们用李克特量表(0-4)对这些优先级进行评级,并使用加权平均值确定前10名。最后阶段包括专家小组对这些最优先事项进行深入讨论和排名。结果:在第一轮中,专家们提出了20个国家级和17个次国家级优先事项,然后对这些优先事项进行评级和排名,以在每个级别的前10名中达成共识。确定的三大国家优先事项是修订《国家烟草控制立法》、监测《国家烟草控制协议》的执行情况以及保护卫生政策不受烟草业的干扰。前三个次国家级优先事项是:执行《禁止烟草贸易协定》和电子烟禁令(PECA),让民间社会参与烟草控制工作,以及促进无烟学校和无烟村庄。结论:虽然国家政策和立法对于加强总体烟草控制框架至关重要,但在国家和国家以下各级有效实施和执法对于遏制印度的烟草威胁至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信