Veterans Health System Leader and Clinician Perspectives on Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Fatima Rahim, Megan E Vanneman, Stephanie Tuckett, Susan L Zickmund, Adam J Gordon, Audrey L Jones, Richard E Nelson, Chelsey R Schlechter
{"title":"Veterans Health System Leader and Clinician Perspectives on Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Fatima Rahim, Megan E Vanneman, Stephanie Tuckett, Susan L Zickmund, Adam J Gordon, Audrey L Jones, Richard E Nelson, Chelsey R Schlechter","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Private methadone treatment paid for by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), called community care (CC), and mobile opioid treatment programs (OTPs) are strategies to expand Veteran access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate leader and clinician perspectives on these modalities compared with treatment provided directly by VA OTPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with VA OTP leaders and clinicians from 12 of the 33 VA OTP sites nationwide. Participants (N=24) were asked to compare access, quality, and cost of methadone treatment between VA OTPs and CC and asked about the feasibility of deploying mobile OTP services. Two analysts independently coded the transcribed data and used thematic analysis to identify salient themes and representative quotes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VA leaders and clinicians perceived CC to have longer wait times and lower quality care, but expected these services to be less expensive than VA OTPs. Mobile OTP services were viewed as a potential solution to improve access, though concerns were raised about staffing and the reduced availability of wrap-around services. Key considerations for successful mobile OTP implementation included identifying high-need localities, addressing patient needs, and ensuring financial viability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within and outside VA, there is growing interest in expanding access to medications for OUD, such as methadone. Leaders and clinicians highlighted important access, quality, and cost considerations when exploring innovative treatment modalities for methadone, such as mobile OTP services and CC. Findings from this VA evaluation may guide methadone treatment improvement in other health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Private methadone treatment paid for by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), called community care (CC), and mobile opioid treatment programs (OTPs) are strategies to expand Veteran access to methadone treatment for opioid use disorder. The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate leader and clinician perspectives on these modalities compared with treatment provided directly by VA OTPs.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with VA OTP leaders and clinicians from 12 of the 33 VA OTP sites nationwide. Participants (N=24) were asked to compare access, quality, and cost of methadone treatment between VA OTPs and CC and asked about the feasibility of deploying mobile OTP services. Two analysts independently coded the transcribed data and used thematic analysis to identify salient themes and representative quotes.

Results: VA leaders and clinicians perceived CC to have longer wait times and lower quality care, but expected these services to be less expensive than VA OTPs. Mobile OTP services were viewed as a potential solution to improve access, though concerns were raised about staffing and the reduced availability of wrap-around services. Key considerations for successful mobile OTP implementation included identifying high-need localities, addressing patient needs, and ensuring financial viability.

Conclusions: Within and outside VA, there is growing interest in expanding access to medications for OUD, such as methadone. Leaders and clinicians highlighted important access, quality, and cost considerations when exploring innovative treatment modalities for methadone, such as mobile OTP services and CC. Findings from this VA evaluation may guide methadone treatment improvement in other health systems.

退伍军人卫生系统的领导者和临床医生的观点扩大获得美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。
目的:由退伍军人事务部(VA)支付的私人美沙酮治疗,称为社区护理(CC),以及移动阿片类药物治疗计划(OTPs)是扩大退伍军人获得美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的策略。本评估的目的是调查领导者和临床医生对这些模式的看法,并将其与VA OTPs直接提供的治疗进行比较。方法:对来自全国33个VA OTP站点中的12个VA OTP站点的领导者和临床医生进行半结构化访谈。参与者(N=24)被要求比较VA OTP和CC之间美沙酮治疗的可及性、质量和成本,并被问及部署移动OTP服务的可行性。两位分析师分别对转录的数据进行编码,并使用主题分析来确定突出的主题和代表性的引用。结果:VA领导和临床医生认为CC有更长的等待时间和更低质量的护理,但期望这些服务比VA OTPs更便宜。移动OTP服务被视为改善访问的潜在解决方案,尽管人们对人员配备和可获得性降低的问题表示担忧。成功实施移动OTP的关键考虑因素包括确定高需求地区、解决患者需求和确保财务可行性。结论:在VA内外,越来越多的人对扩大OUD药物的可及性感兴趣,如美沙酮。领导者和临床医生在探索美沙酮创新治疗模式(如移动OTP服务和CC)时强调了重要的可及性、质量和成本考虑因素。这项VA评估的结果可能会指导其他卫生系统改善美沙酮治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信