Min Yuan , Xin Lin , Haolun Ding , Sicheng Qu , Yaning Yang , Xu Steven Xu
{"title":"Treatment-agnostic joint modeling of longitudinal circulating tumor dna predicts survival across first-line regimens in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC","authors":"Min Yuan , Xin Lin , Haolun Ding , Sicheng Qu , Yaning Yang , Xu Steven Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>To develop a treatment-agnostic joint model leveraging longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics to predict overall survival (OS) across different treatment regimens without incorporating treatment information using data from the IMpower150 trial in treatment-naïve metastatic non-squamous NSCLC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Experimental approach</h3><div>Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ABCP, ACP, or BCP, with plasma samples collected at baseline and multiple time points to track longitudinal ctDNA changes. The joint model followed a two-step approach by combining two separate submodels: a disease submodel for ctDNA dynamics and a survival submodel for time-to-event analysis. Random effects are derived from the nonlinear mixed effects model for ctDNA dynamics. In the subsequent step, these individual random effects are incorporated as covariates in the survival submodel. A landmark modeling approach was used where ctDNA data from the first 21 weeks posttreatment was used to predicts OS beyond 21 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Key Results</h3><div>Among 466 participants, 348 had detectable ctDNA at one or more time points and were stratified into training (<em>n</em> = 181) and test (<em>n</em> = 167) sets. Fourteen ctDNA summary metrics were assessed, with median allele frequency for known/likely mutations emerging as the top-performing metric. Overall, the treatment-agnostic model's predicted survival curves closely matched the observed ones across treatment arms in both training and test sets. Predicted median OS and 2-/3-year OS rates aligned well for ABCP, ACP, and BCP, with discrepancies generally under 20 %. Although the model tended to overpredict OS for ACP—likely due to a small sample size—the final IMpower150 analysis reported median OS values within 10 % of our predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions & Implications</h3><div>Early ctDNA monitoring and modeling have the potential to significantly enhance treatment personalization. By enabling the early prediction of patient outcomes across various treatment regimens, this treatment-agnostic model supports more informed clinical decision-making, ultimately improving patient management and outcomes in oncology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 107275"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725002738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
To develop a treatment-agnostic joint model leveraging longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics to predict overall survival (OS) across different treatment regimens without incorporating treatment information using data from the IMpower150 trial in treatment-naïve metastatic non-squamous NSCLC patients.
Experimental approach
Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ABCP, ACP, or BCP, with plasma samples collected at baseline and multiple time points to track longitudinal ctDNA changes. The joint model followed a two-step approach by combining two separate submodels: a disease submodel for ctDNA dynamics and a survival submodel for time-to-event analysis. Random effects are derived from the nonlinear mixed effects model for ctDNA dynamics. In the subsequent step, these individual random effects are incorporated as covariates in the survival submodel. A landmark modeling approach was used where ctDNA data from the first 21 weeks posttreatment was used to predicts OS beyond 21 weeks.
Key Results
Among 466 participants, 348 had detectable ctDNA at one or more time points and were stratified into training (n = 181) and test (n = 167) sets. Fourteen ctDNA summary metrics were assessed, with median allele frequency for known/likely mutations emerging as the top-performing metric. Overall, the treatment-agnostic model's predicted survival curves closely matched the observed ones across treatment arms in both training and test sets. Predicted median OS and 2-/3-year OS rates aligned well for ABCP, ACP, and BCP, with discrepancies generally under 20 %. Although the model tended to overpredict OS for ACP—likely due to a small sample size—the final IMpower150 analysis reported median OS values within 10 % of our predictions.
Conclusions & Implications
Early ctDNA monitoring and modeling have the potential to significantly enhance treatment personalization. By enabling the early prediction of patient outcomes across various treatment regimens, this treatment-agnostic model supports more informed clinical decision-making, ultimately improving patient management and outcomes in oncology.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development.
More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making.
Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.