No Selective Attentional Shift despite Prefrontal Activation during a Working-Memory Task with Unconscious Stimuli.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0183-25.2025
Tiziana Pedale, Olympia Karampela, Johan Eriksson
{"title":"No Selective Attentional Shift despite Prefrontal Activation during a Working-Memory Task with Unconscious Stimuli.","authors":"Tiziana Pedale, Olympia Karampela, Johan Eriksson","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0183-25.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A key process for successful working memory is to prioritize task-relevant information over distraction, i.e., to control attentional deployment. Here we investigate to what extent attentional control during a delayed match-to-sample task can be achieved when to-be-remembered items were presented unconsciously together with distracting information and with a prestimulus cue that indicated whether the target was likely to appear on the left or right side of the screen. This expectation was sometimes violated (20% of trials), requiring reorienting of attention to successfully solve the task. Moreover, the cue was uninformative of the exact location of the target, which could appear on the top, middle, or bottom part of the screen. Participants performed better than chance on unconscious trials only when the cue correctly indicated target side, suggesting an inability to reorient attention when the cues were invalid. Neural activity (fMRI BOLD signal change) in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex was significant for unconscious valid-cue trials and remained significant for invalid-cue trials only in the lateral prefrontal cortex, although neither region was significantly modulated by cue validity. Parietal regions did not show significant activation for valid or invalid unconscious stimuli. Thus, even though activity in brain regions associated with cognitive control reached significant levels for unconscious stimuli, there was no evidence for adaptive deployment of selective attention based on unconscious information, which was the case for conscious stimuli. The ability to control attentional deployment appears to differ between conscious and unconscious working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0183-25.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key process for successful working memory is to prioritize task-relevant information over distraction, i.e., to control attentional deployment. Here we investigate to what extent attentional control during a delayed match-to-sample task can be achieved when to-be-remembered items were presented unconsciously together with distracting information and with a prestimulus cue that indicated whether the target was likely to appear on the left or right side of the screen. This expectation was sometimes violated (20% of trials), requiring reorienting of attention to successfully solve the task. Moreover, the cue was uninformative of the exact location of the target, which could appear on the top, middle, or bottom part of the screen. Participants performed better than chance on unconscious trials only when the cue correctly indicated target side, suggesting an inability to reorient attention when the cues were invalid. Neural activity (fMRI BOLD signal change) in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex was significant for unconscious valid-cue trials and remained significant for invalid-cue trials only in the lateral prefrontal cortex, although neither region was significantly modulated by cue validity. Parietal regions did not show significant activation for valid or invalid unconscious stimuli. Thus, even though activity in brain regions associated with cognitive control reached significant levels for unconscious stimuli, there was no evidence for adaptive deployment of selective attention based on unconscious information, which was the case for conscious stimuli. The ability to control attentional deployment appears to differ between conscious and unconscious working memory.

在无意识刺激的工作记忆任务中,尽管前额叶激活,但没有选择性注意力转移。
成功的工作记忆的一个关键过程是优先考虑与任务相关的信息,而不是分散注意力,即控制注意力的部署。在这个实验中,我们研究了当被试无意识地将被记住的项目与分散注意力的信息一起呈现,并有一个提示目标可能出现在屏幕左边还是右边的预刺激提示时,在延迟匹配样本任务中,注意力控制可以达到什么程度。这种期望有时会被违背(20%的试验),需要重新调整注意力以成功解决任务。此外,提示不能提供目标的确切位置信息,目标可能出现在屏幕的顶部、中间或底部。在无意识的测试中,只有当提示正确指向目标时,参与者的表现才比随机的好,这表明当提示无效时,他们无法重新定向注意力。内侧和外侧前额皮质的神经活动(fMRI BOLD信号变化)在无意识有效提示试验中显著,在无效提示试验中仅在外侧前额皮质保持显著,尽管这两个区域都不受提示效度的显著调节。对于有效或无效的无意识刺激,顶叶区域没有明显的激活。因此,尽管与认知控制相关的大脑区域的活动在无意识刺激下达到了显著水平,但没有证据表明选择性注意是基于无意识信息的适应性部署,这与有意识刺激的情况不同。控制注意力部署的能力似乎在有意识和无意识的工作记忆中有所不同。成功工作记忆的一个关键过程是控制注意部署。在这里,我们通过测试参与者在必要时将注意力从预期目标位置转移到替代位置的能力,研究了在无意识刺激下工作记忆任务中注意力是如何被控制的。尽管前额叶皮层被激活,但当提示无效时,参与者并没有表现出注意力的转移,这表明他们无法根据无意识信息适应性地部署选择性注意力。此外,在有效或无效的无意识刺激下,顶叶注意区域没有被激活。这些结果表明,与有意识的工作记忆不同,无意识刺激不会引发灵活的注意力转移,这突出了注意力是如何基于意识控制的关键区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信