Clinicopathological features and survival differences between G/GEJ-CSC and GAC: A Propensity score-matched, large-scale cross-population retrospective study

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110444
Kang Liu , Kailai Yin , Yubo Ma , Ruihong Xia , Yingsong Zheng , Li Yuan , Xiangdong Cheng , Zaisheng Ye , Zhengchen Jiang
{"title":"Clinicopathological features and survival differences between G/GEJ-CSC and GAC: A Propensity score-matched, large-scale cross-population retrospective study","authors":"Kang Liu ,&nbsp;Kailai Yin ,&nbsp;Yubo Ma ,&nbsp;Ruihong Xia ,&nbsp;Yingsong Zheng ,&nbsp;Li Yuan ,&nbsp;Xiangdong Cheng ,&nbsp;Zaisheng Ye ,&nbsp;Zhengchen Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Gastric squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, collectively termed gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas containing squamous cells (G/GEJ-CSC).Due to low incidence and high heterogeneity, their clinicopathological features and prognostic patterns lack systematic investigation. Traditional views suggest greater aggressiveness but lack large-scale evidence. This study uses large-scale cohorts to compare G/GEJ-CSC with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), clarifying features, prognosis, and supporting personalized treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of eligible patients with G/GEJ-CSC and GAC from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (2010–2024) and the SEER database (2004–2020). Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate survival differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with GAC patients, G/GEJ-CSC occurred more frequently in the gastric-esophageal junction and exhibited a significantly higher Epstein-Barr virus positivity rate, along with worse clinicopathological features. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pathological type was an independent risk factor for overall survival (Chinese cohort:HR = 1.45,P = 0.044; SEER:HR = 1.23).Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that OS was significantly inferior in G/GEJ-CSC patients compared with GAC (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 33.0 % vs. 56.1 %, P &lt; 0.001; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 42.7 %, P = 0.013), and this difference persisted after PSM adjustment (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 36.4 % vs. 52.0 %, P = 0.034; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 44.1 %, P = 0.041). Stratified analysis further indicated a more pronounced survival gap in early-stage patients (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS43.1 % vs.84.1 %, P &lt; 0.001; SEER: 45.4 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>G/GEJ-CSC, a rare gastric cancer subtype, has unique aggressive biology and “early high-risk” prognosis. Need enhanced early identification and personalized treatment exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 11","pages":"Article 110444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325008728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Gastric squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, collectively termed gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas containing squamous cells (G/GEJ-CSC).Due to low incidence and high heterogeneity, their clinicopathological features and prognostic patterns lack systematic investigation. Traditional views suggest greater aggressiveness but lack large-scale evidence. This study uses large-scale cohorts to compare G/GEJ-CSC with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), clarifying features, prognosis, and supporting personalized treatment.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of eligible patients with G/GEJ-CSC and GAC from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (2010–2024) and the SEER database (2004–2020). Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate survival differences.

Results

Compared with GAC patients, G/GEJ-CSC occurred more frequently in the gastric-esophageal junction and exhibited a significantly higher Epstein-Barr virus positivity rate, along with worse clinicopathological features. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pathological type was an independent risk factor for overall survival (Chinese cohort:HR = 1.45,P = 0.044; SEER:HR = 1.23).Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that OS was significantly inferior in G/GEJ-CSC patients compared with GAC (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 33.0 % vs. 56.1 %, P < 0.001; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 42.7 %, P = 0.013), and this difference persisted after PSM adjustment (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 36.4 % vs. 52.0 %, P = 0.034; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 44.1 %, P = 0.041). Stratified analysis further indicated a more pronounced survival gap in early-stage patients (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS43.1 % vs.84.1 %, P < 0.001; SEER: 45.4 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

G/GEJ-CSC, a rare gastric cancer subtype, has unique aggressive biology and “early high-risk” prognosis. Need enhanced early identification and personalized treatment exploration.
G/GEJ-CSC和GAC的临床病理特征和生存差异:一项倾向评分匹配的大规模跨人群回顾性研究
背景和目的:胃鳞状细胞癌和腺鳞状细胞癌,统称为胃和胃食管交界处含鳞状细胞癌(G/GEJ-CSC)。由于发病率低,异质性高,其临床病理特征和预后模式缺乏系统的研究。传统观点认为更具侵略性,但缺乏大规模证据。本研究采用大规模队列比较G/GEJ-CSC与胃腺癌(GAC),明确其特征、预后,支持个性化治疗。方法:回顾性分析浙江省肿瘤医院(2010-2024)和SEER数据库(2004-2020)符合条件的G/GEJ-CSC和GAC患者的临床病理特征。倾向评分匹配用于平衡混杂因素。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评价生存差异。结果:与GAC患者相比,G/GEJ-CSC多发于胃-食管交界处,Epstein-Barr病毒阳性率明显高于GAC患者,临床病理特征较GAC患者差。多因素Cox分析显示,病理类型是影响总生存的独立危险因素(中国队列:HR = 1.45,P = 0.044; SEER:HR = 1.23)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,G/GEJ-CSC患者的5年OS明显低于GAC(中国队列:33.0% vs 56.1%)。结论:G/GEJ-CSC是一种罕见的胃癌亚型,具有独特的侵袭性生物学和“早期高危”预后。需要加强早期识别和个性化治疗探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信