Clinicopathological features and survival differences between G/GEJ-CSC and GAC: A Propensity score-matched, large-scale cross-population retrospective study
Kang Liu , Kailai Yin , Yubo Ma , Ruihong Xia , Yingsong Zheng , Li Yuan , Xiangdong Cheng , Zaisheng Ye , Zhengchen Jiang
{"title":"Clinicopathological features and survival differences between G/GEJ-CSC and GAC: A Propensity score-matched, large-scale cross-population retrospective study","authors":"Kang Liu , Kailai Yin , Yubo Ma , Ruihong Xia , Yingsong Zheng , Li Yuan , Xiangdong Cheng , Zaisheng Ye , Zhengchen Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Gastric squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, collectively termed gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas containing squamous cells (G/GEJ-CSC).Due to low incidence and high heterogeneity, their clinicopathological features and prognostic patterns lack systematic investigation. Traditional views suggest greater aggressiveness but lack large-scale evidence. This study uses large-scale cohorts to compare G/GEJ-CSC with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), clarifying features, prognosis, and supporting personalized treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of eligible patients with G/GEJ-CSC and GAC from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (2010–2024) and the SEER database (2004–2020). Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate survival differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with GAC patients, G/GEJ-CSC occurred more frequently in the gastric-esophageal junction and exhibited a significantly higher Epstein-Barr virus positivity rate, along with worse clinicopathological features. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pathological type was an independent risk factor for overall survival (Chinese cohort:HR = 1.45,P = 0.044; SEER:HR = 1.23).Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that OS was significantly inferior in G/GEJ-CSC patients compared with GAC (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 33.0 % vs. 56.1 %, P < 0.001; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 42.7 %, P = 0.013), and this difference persisted after PSM adjustment (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 36.4 % vs. 52.0 %, P = 0.034; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 44.1 %, P = 0.041). Stratified analysis further indicated a more pronounced survival gap in early-stage patients (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS43.1 % vs.84.1 %, P < 0.001; SEER: 45.4 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>G/GEJ-CSC, a rare gastric cancer subtype, has unique aggressive biology and “early high-risk” prognosis. Need enhanced early identification and personalized treatment exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 11","pages":"Article 110444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325008728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
Gastric squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, collectively termed gastric and gastroesophageal junction carcinomas containing squamous cells (G/GEJ-CSC).Due to low incidence and high heterogeneity, their clinicopathological features and prognostic patterns lack systematic investigation. Traditional views suggest greater aggressiveness but lack large-scale evidence. This study uses large-scale cohorts to compare G/GEJ-CSC with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), clarifying features, prognosis, and supporting personalized treatment.
Methods
Retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of eligible patients with G/GEJ-CSC and GAC from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (2010–2024) and the SEER database (2004–2020). Propensity score matching was used to balance confounding factors. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate survival differences.
Results
Compared with GAC patients, G/GEJ-CSC occurred more frequently in the gastric-esophageal junction and exhibited a significantly higher Epstein-Barr virus positivity rate, along with worse clinicopathological features. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pathological type was an independent risk factor for overall survival (Chinese cohort:HR = 1.45,P = 0.044; SEER:HR = 1.23).Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that OS was significantly inferior in G/GEJ-CSC patients compared with GAC (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 33.0 % vs. 56.1 %, P < 0.001; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 42.7 %, P = 0.013), and this difference persisted after PSM adjustment (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS 36.4 % vs. 52.0 %, P = 0.034; SEER: 34.8 % vs. 44.1 %, P = 0.041). Stratified analysis further indicated a more pronounced survival gap in early-stage patients (Chinese cohort: 5-year OS43.1 % vs.84.1 %, P < 0.001; SEER: 45.4 % vs. 54.2 %, P = 0.002).
Conclusion
G/GEJ-CSC, a rare gastric cancer subtype, has unique aggressive biology and “early high-risk” prognosis. Need enhanced early identification and personalized treatment exploration.
期刊介绍:
JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery.
The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.