Personalizing therapy in early gestational diabetes.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Simran Thakkar, Ponnusamy Saravanan, Lakshmi Nagendra, Saptarshi Bhattacharya
{"title":"Personalizing therapy in early gestational diabetes.","authors":"Simran Thakkar, Ponnusamy Saravanan, Lakshmi Nagendra, Saptarshi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1097/MED.0000000000000931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Early gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM) is being increasingly detected on the background of rising obesity rates and widespread early pregnancy screening. However, diagnostic criteria and management strategies remain uncertain. This review summarizes current evidence on diagnostic thresholds, maternal and fetal outcomes, and the impact of early treatment, with an emphasis on balancing benefits and risks.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While observational studies link eGDM to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, evidence from intervention studies remains limited. The Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) is the only large multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) published till date. The early intervention arm in the study received education on dietary counseling and capillary blood glucose monitoring, with pharmacotherapy using insulin or metformin introduced when indicated. The trial reported that treatment before 14 weeks reduced neonatal respiratory distress in higher glycemic bands but increased the risk of small-for-gestational-age state at lower glycemic bands. Notably, one-third of the untreated control group reverted to normoglycemia at 24-28 weeks. Given the uncertainties in diagnostic thresholds used in TOBOGM, a composite risk score-based approach integrating clinical and biochemical parameters may provide an alternative for identifying pregnancies in need of intervention.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current diagnostic criteria may not identify eGDM pregnancies that would benefit from intervention. Redefining diagnostic thresholds and integrating them with clinical risk factors could categorize pregnancies in need of intervention. Appropriately designed RCTs are required to generate evidence for accurate identification and optimal treatment of eGDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10964,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Early gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM) is being increasingly detected on the background of rising obesity rates and widespread early pregnancy screening. However, diagnostic criteria and management strategies remain uncertain. This review summarizes current evidence on diagnostic thresholds, maternal and fetal outcomes, and the impact of early treatment, with an emphasis on balancing benefits and risks.

Recent findings: While observational studies link eGDM to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, evidence from intervention studies remains limited. The Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) is the only large multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) published till date. The early intervention arm in the study received education on dietary counseling and capillary blood glucose monitoring, with pharmacotherapy using insulin or metformin introduced when indicated. The trial reported that treatment before 14 weeks reduced neonatal respiratory distress in higher glycemic bands but increased the risk of small-for-gestational-age state at lower glycemic bands. Notably, one-third of the untreated control group reverted to normoglycemia at 24-28 weeks. Given the uncertainties in diagnostic thresholds used in TOBOGM, a composite risk score-based approach integrating clinical and biochemical parameters may provide an alternative for identifying pregnancies in need of intervention.

Summary: Current diagnostic criteria may not identify eGDM pregnancies that would benefit from intervention. Redefining diagnostic thresholds and integrating them with clinical risk factors could categorize pregnancies in need of intervention. Appropriately designed RCTs are required to generate evidence for accurate identification and optimal treatment of eGDM.

妊娠早期糖尿病的个体化治疗。
综述目的:在肥胖率上升和早期妊娠筛查广泛的背景下,妊娠早期糖尿病(eGDM)越来越多地被发现。然而,诊断标准和管理策略仍然不确定。本综述总结了目前关于诊断阈值、孕产妇和胎儿结局以及早期治疗影响的证据,重点是平衡获益和风险。最新发现:虽然观察性研究将eGDM与母体和胎儿的不良结局联系起来,但干预研究的证据仍然有限。妊娠期糖尿病的治疗(TOBOGM)是迄今为止唯一发表的大型多中心随机对照试验(RCT)。研究中的早期干预组接受了饮食咨询和毛细血管血糖监测方面的教育,并在需要时使用胰岛素或二甲双胍进行药物治疗。该试验报告称,14周前治疗可降低血糖水平较高的新生儿呼吸窘迫,但会增加血糖水平较低的新生儿小胎龄状态的风险。值得注意的是,三分之一未经治疗的对照组在24-28周恢复到正常血糖。鉴于TOBOGM中使用的诊断阈值的不确定性,综合临床和生化参数的基于风险评分的复合方法可能为识别需要干预的妊娠提供另一种选择。总结:目前的诊断标准可能无法识别可从干预中获益的eGDM妊娠。重新定义诊断阈值并将其与临床危险因素相结合,可以对需要干预的妊娠进行分类。需要适当设计的随机对照试验来提供准确识别和最佳治疗eGDM的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments in the field from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring twelve key topics – including androgens, gastrointestinal hormones, diabetes and the endocrine pancreas, and neuroendocrinology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信