Aneri Bhargav Patel, William Driscoll, Ajay Nair Sharma, Luke Horton, Janellen Smith
{"title":"Survival Outcomes in Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: A Meta Analysis.","authors":"Aneri Bhargav Patel, William Driscoll, Ajay Nair Sharma, Luke Horton, Janellen Smith","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and limited evidence guiding treatment. Optimal therapy remains undefined due to disease heterogeneity and a lack of large prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess survival outcomes across treatment modalities and clinical stages in patients with angiosarcoma using a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search identified studies reporting treatment and outcome data for cutaneous angiosarcoma. Patient-level data from 159 patients across 9 studies were extracted. Patients were stratified into early-stage and mid/late-stage. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression, and subgroup comparisons of recurrence, metastasis, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early-stage patients showed longer average survival-as well as delayed recurrence and metastasis-compared with mid/late-stage patients; differences were not statistically significant. Tumor location was the strongest predictor of survival in advanced-stage disease, while age predicted mortality in early-stage, with younger patients having improved survival. Treatment modality and surgical type were not independently associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumor location and patient age are important prognostic factors in angiosarcoma. Treatment modality did not significantly affect survival or recurrence, supporting individualized treatment and further investigation into survival determinants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"415-420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and limited evidence guiding treatment. Optimal therapy remains undefined due to disease heterogeneity and a lack of large prospective trials.
Objective: To assess survival outcomes across treatment modalities and clinical stages in patients with angiosarcoma using a meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic search identified studies reporting treatment and outcome data for cutaneous angiosarcoma. Patient-level data from 159 patients across 9 studies were extracted. Patients were stratified into early-stage and mid/late-stage. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression, and subgroup comparisons of recurrence, metastasis, and survival.
Results: Early-stage patients showed longer average survival-as well as delayed recurrence and metastasis-compared with mid/late-stage patients; differences were not statistically significant. Tumor location was the strongest predictor of survival in advanced-stage disease, while age predicted mortality in early-stage, with younger patients having improved survival. Treatment modality and surgical type were not independently associated with survival.
Conclusion: Tumor location and patient age are important prognostic factors in angiosarcoma. Treatment modality did not significantly affect survival or recurrence, supporting individualized treatment and further investigation into survival determinants.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.