Redefining preclinical testing: human-relevant alternatives beyond animal models.

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
BMB Reports Pub Date : 2025-09-16
Jieun Jang, Wonjun Yang, Hanseul Yang, Nam-Kyung Lee, Jong-Gil Park, Wantae Kim, Boksik Cha, Sung-Jin Yoon, Ji-Yoon Noh, Jangwook Lee
{"title":"Redefining preclinical testing: human-relevant alternatives beyond animal models.","authors":"Jieun Jang, Wonjun Yang, Hanseul Yang, Nam-Kyung Lee, Jong-Gil Park, Wantae Kim, Boksik Cha, Sung-Jin Yoon, Ji-Yoon Noh, Jangwook Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both ethical imperatives and scientific limitations increasingly challenge the traditional reliance on animal models for toxicity testing and drug evaluation, particularly in the era of precision medicine. In response, a paradigm shift is underway, marked by the development of advanced in vitro and in silico technologies that can offer human-relevant and mechanistically informed alternatives. This review examines well-established alternatives, such as receptor binding assays, the monocyte activation test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, highlighting their applications, mechanisms, and limitations. We further explore emerging human-relevant technologies that include organoids, organ-on-a-chip systems, microphysiological systems, and artificial intelligence-powered modeling platforms. Special emphasis is placed on immune-integrated microphysiological systems as next-generation platforms to evaluate immunotherapy, vaccine responses, and immune toxicities. These models recapitulate dynamic human physiological processes, such as hematopoiesis and germinal center reactions, beyond the capabilities of traditional animal systems. Collectively, these technologies represent scientifically superior and ethically progressive trajectories for preclinical testing. Their integration into regulatory and industrial workflows requires continued refinement, cross-sector collaboration, and standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":9010,"journal":{"name":"BMB Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMB Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both ethical imperatives and scientific limitations increasingly challenge the traditional reliance on animal models for toxicity testing and drug evaluation, particularly in the era of precision medicine. In response, a paradigm shift is underway, marked by the development of advanced in vitro and in silico technologies that can offer human-relevant and mechanistically informed alternatives. This review examines well-established alternatives, such as receptor binding assays, the monocyte activation test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, highlighting their applications, mechanisms, and limitations. We further explore emerging human-relevant technologies that include organoids, organ-on-a-chip systems, microphysiological systems, and artificial intelligence-powered modeling platforms. Special emphasis is placed on immune-integrated microphysiological systems as next-generation platforms to evaluate immunotherapy, vaccine responses, and immune toxicities. These models recapitulate dynamic human physiological processes, such as hematopoiesis and germinal center reactions, beyond the capabilities of traditional animal systems. Collectively, these technologies represent scientifically superior and ethically progressive trajectories for preclinical testing. Their integration into regulatory and industrial workflows requires continued refinement, cross-sector collaboration, and standardization.

重新定义临床前试验:超越动物模型的与人类相关的替代方法。
伦理要求和科学限制日益挑战传统上依赖动物模型进行毒性试验和药物评价,特别是在精准医学时代。作为回应,一种范式的转变正在进行,其标志是先进的体外和硅技术的发展,这些技术可以提供与人类相关的和机械知情的替代方案。本文综述了一些成熟的替代方法,如受体结合试验、单核细胞活化试验和酶联免疫吸附试验,重点介绍了它们的应用、机制和局限性。我们进一步探索新兴的与人类相关的技术,包括类器官、器官芯片系统、微生理系统和人工智能建模平台。特别强调免疫整合微生理系统作为评估免疫治疗、疫苗反应和免疫毒性的下一代平台。这些模型概括了动态的人体生理过程,如造血和生发中心反应,超出了传统动物系统的能力。总的来说,这些技术代表了临床前测试在科学上的优越性和伦理上的进步。将它们集成到监管和工业工作流程中需要持续改进、跨部门协作和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMB Reports
BMB Reports 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The BMB Reports (BMB Rep, established in 1968) is published at the end of every month by Korean Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Copyright is reserved by the Society. The journal publishes short articles and mini reviews. We expect that the BMB Reports will deliver the new scientific findings and knowledge to our readers in fast and timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信