Thresholds for adjunctive medication usage and probability of initiating injectable naltrexone.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1111/add.70189
Kara E Rudolph, Shodai Inose, Nicholas T Williams, Iván Díaz, Rachael K Ross, Adam Bisaga, Matisyahu Shulman
{"title":"Thresholds for adjunctive medication usage and probability of initiating injectable naltrexone.","authors":"Kara E Rudolph, Shodai Inose, Nicholas T Williams, Iván Díaz, Rachael K Ross, Adam Bisaga, Matisyahu Shulman","doi":"10.1111/add.70189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To estimate the effectiveness of different thresholds for administering opioid withdrawal medications (clonidine and clonazepam) on the probability of successfully initiating extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) among participants with opioid use disorder (OUD) during medically managed withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multisite clinical trial comparing a rapid vs. standard approach for XR-NTX initiation, 2021-2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six community inpatient addiction treatment units in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>English-speaking adults seeking treatment for DSM-5 OUD and expressing interest in XR-NTX treatment (n = 415).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We estimated the extent to which the following thresholds for adjunctive medication administration would affect the probability of initiating XR-NTX over time: 1) where adjunctive medications were given in response to at mild-to-moderate withdrawal symptoms or greater [Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score ≥ 5), 2) where adjunctive medications were given in response to minimal withdrawal symptoms or greater (COWS score ≥ 3) and 3) where adjunctive medications were given regardless of withdrawal symptoms. Using a longitudinal sequentially doubly robust estimator, we estimated the cumulative probability of XR-NTX initiation under each of these three treatment regimes while accounting for dropout and initiation of other medications as competing events.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The estimated probability of initiating XR-NTX by day 14 was 50.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 41.8-58.9) under the no-threshold regime, 43.9% (95% CI = 39.1-48.7) under the regime of waiting for minimal withdrawal symptoms and 38.5% (95% CI = 34.3-42.6) under the regime of waiting for mild-to-moderate withdrawal symptoms. Probability of XR-NTX initiation was a statistically significant 11.9 percentage points higher (95% CI = 3.6-20.2) under the no-threshold regime versus the mild-to-moderate threshold regime, and a non-statistically significant 6.4 percentage points (95% CI = -0.8 to 13.7) higher under the no-threshold regime versus the minimal threshold regime.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing clonidine and clonazepam daily during the first five days of medically managed opioid withdrawal appears to statistically significantly increase the likelihood of initiating extended-release naltrexone treatment compared with waiting for mild-to-moderate withdrawal symptoms to administer adjunctive medications. To improve initiation rates, providers may consider lowering the threshold at which they provide adjunctive medications, giving these medications preemptively or to manage even minimal withdrawal symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To estimate the effectiveness of different thresholds for administering opioid withdrawal medications (clonidine and clonazepam) on the probability of successfully initiating extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) among participants with opioid use disorder (OUD) during medically managed withdrawal.

Design: Secondary analysis of a multisite clinical trial comparing a rapid vs. standard approach for XR-NTX initiation, 2021-2022.

Setting: Six community inpatient addiction treatment units in the United States.

Participants: English-speaking adults seeking treatment for DSM-5 OUD and expressing interest in XR-NTX treatment (n = 415).

Measurements: We estimated the extent to which the following thresholds for adjunctive medication administration would affect the probability of initiating XR-NTX over time: 1) where adjunctive medications were given in response to at mild-to-moderate withdrawal symptoms or greater [Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) score ≥ 5), 2) where adjunctive medications were given in response to minimal withdrawal symptoms or greater (COWS score ≥ 3) and 3) where adjunctive medications were given regardless of withdrawal symptoms. Using a longitudinal sequentially doubly robust estimator, we estimated the cumulative probability of XR-NTX initiation under each of these three treatment regimes while accounting for dropout and initiation of other medications as competing events.

Findings: The estimated probability of initiating XR-NTX by day 14 was 50.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 41.8-58.9) under the no-threshold regime, 43.9% (95% CI = 39.1-48.7) under the regime of waiting for minimal withdrawal symptoms and 38.5% (95% CI = 34.3-42.6) under the regime of waiting for mild-to-moderate withdrawal symptoms. Probability of XR-NTX initiation was a statistically significant 11.9 percentage points higher (95% CI = 3.6-20.2) under the no-threshold regime versus the mild-to-moderate threshold regime, and a non-statistically significant 6.4 percentage points (95% CI = -0.8 to 13.7) higher under the no-threshold regime versus the minimal threshold regime.

Conclusions: Providing clonidine and clonazepam daily during the first five days of medically managed opioid withdrawal appears to statistically significantly increase the likelihood of initiating extended-release naltrexone treatment compared with waiting for mild-to-moderate withdrawal symptoms to administer adjunctive medications. To improve initiation rates, providers may consider lowering the threshold at which they provide adjunctive medications, giving these medications preemptively or to manage even minimal withdrawal symptoms.

辅助用药的阈值和开始注射纳曲酮的概率。
目的:评估阿片类药物戒断药物(clonidine和clonazepam)的不同阈值对阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者在药物管理戒断期间成功启动纳曲酮(XR-NTX)的概率的有效性。设计:2021-2022年,对XR-NTX起始治疗的快速和标准方法进行多位点临床试验的二次分析。环境:美国六个社区住院成瘾治疗单位。参与者:寻求DSM-5 OUD治疗并表示对XR-NTX治疗感兴趣的英语成年人(n = 415)。测量:我们估计了以下辅助用药阈值政府将随着时间的推移影响XR-NTX启动概率的程度:1)在轻度至中度戒断症状或更严重的情况下给予辅助药物[临床阿片戒断量表(COWS)评分≥5],2)在轻微戒断症状或更严重的情况下给予辅助药物(COWS评分≥3),以及3)在没有戒断症状的情况下给予辅助药物。使用纵向顺序双稳健估计器,我们估计了在这三种治疗方案下XR-NTX起始的累积概率,同时考虑到退出和其他药物起始作为竞争事件。结果:在无阈值方案下,第14天启动XR-NTX的估计概率为50.4%[95%置信区间(CI) = 41.8-58.9),在等待最小戒断症状方案下为43.9% (95% CI = 39.1-48.7),在等待轻度至中度戒断症状方案下为38.5% (95% CI = 34.3-42.6)。与轻度至中度阈值方案相比,无阈值方案XR-NTX启动的概率在统计学上显著提高11.9个百分点(95% CI = 3.6-20.2),无阈值方案与最低阈值方案相比,无阈值方案的XR-NTX启动概率在统计学上显著提高6.4个百分点(95% CI = -0.8 - 13.7)。结论:在药物管理的阿片类药物戒断的前5天每天提供克拉定和氯硝西泮,与等待轻度至中度戒断症状给予辅助药物相比,在统计学上显著增加了开始纳曲酮缓释治疗的可能性。为了提高起始率,提供者可以考虑降低他们提供辅助药物的门槛,先发制人地给予这些药物,或者控制哪怕是最小的戒断症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信