A Digital Measure of Eye Movements During Reading Sensitively Captures Oculomotor and Speech Dysfunction, Early Changes, and Disease Progression in Ataxias.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brandon Oubre, Faye Yang, Anna C Luddy, Rohin Manohar, Nancy N Soja, Christopher D Stephen, Jeremy D Schmahmann, Divya Kulkarni, Lawrence White, Siddharth Patel, Anoopum S Gupta
{"title":"A Digital Measure of Eye Movements During Reading Sensitively Captures Oculomotor and Speech Dysfunction, Early Changes, and Disease Progression in Ataxias.","authors":"Brandon Oubre, Faye Yang, Anna C Luddy, Rohin Manohar, Nancy N Soja, Christopher D Stephen, Jeremy D Schmahmann, Divya Kulkarni, Lawrence White, Siddharth Patel, Anoopum S Gupta","doi":"10.1002/ana.78039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sensitive behavioral measures are needed for clinical trials in ataxias and other neurodegenerative diseases. We hypothesized that quantitative analysis of eye movements during a natural multi-component task (passage reading) could produce a measure capable of capturing subclinical signs and disease progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Binocular gaze sampled at 1000 hertz (Hz) was collected from 102 individuals with ataxia (including 36 spinocerebellar ataxias, 12 Friedreich's ataxia, and 5 multiple system atrophy) and 70 healthy controls. Longitudinal data were available for 26 participants with ataxia in the ongoing Neurobooth natural history study. The Reading Eye Abnormality Digital (READ) score was developed by training a regression model to aggregate saccade and fixation kinematics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean displacement of fixations, the number and frequency of saccades, and the proportion of regressive saccades were related to oculomotor dysfunction, speech dysfunction, and overall ataxia severity. The READ score was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96, p < 0.001) and correlated with Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) total score (r = 0.82, p < 0.001), oculomotor (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), and speech (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) subscores, and patient reports of function including patient-reported outcome measures (PROM)-Ataxia (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and the Dysarthria Impact Scale (DIS; r = 0.53, p < 0.001). The READ score detected subclinical oculomotor (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.69, p = 0.02) and speech signs (AUC = 0.72, p < 0.001) and disease progression (d = 0.36, p = 0.03). The BARS total did not reach statistical significance in capturing progression between study visits in this cohort (d = 0.27, p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Digital measures of eye movements are a promising approach for sensitively measuring ataxia in clinical trials (including early-stage disease) and may have utility in other neurodegenerative diseases affecting speech or ocular control. ANN NEUROL 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sensitive behavioral measures are needed for clinical trials in ataxias and other neurodegenerative diseases. We hypothesized that quantitative analysis of eye movements during a natural multi-component task (passage reading) could produce a measure capable of capturing subclinical signs and disease progression.

Methods: Binocular gaze sampled at 1000 hertz (Hz) was collected from 102 individuals with ataxia (including 36 spinocerebellar ataxias, 12 Friedreich's ataxia, and 5 multiple system atrophy) and 70 healthy controls. Longitudinal data were available for 26 participants with ataxia in the ongoing Neurobooth natural history study. The Reading Eye Abnormality Digital (READ) score was developed by training a regression model to aggregate saccade and fixation kinematics.

Results: Mean displacement of fixations, the number and frequency of saccades, and the proportion of regressive saccades were related to oculomotor dysfunction, speech dysfunction, and overall ataxia severity. The READ score was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96, p < 0.001) and correlated with Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) total score (r = 0.82, p < 0.001), oculomotor (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), and speech (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) subscores, and patient reports of function including patient-reported outcome measures (PROM)-Ataxia (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and the Dysarthria Impact Scale (DIS; r = 0.53, p < 0.001). The READ score detected subclinical oculomotor (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.69, p = 0.02) and speech signs (AUC = 0.72, p < 0.001) and disease progression (d = 0.36, p = 0.03). The BARS total did not reach statistical significance in capturing progression between study visits in this cohort (d = 0.27, p = 0.08).

Interpretation: Digital measures of eye movements are a promising approach for sensitively measuring ataxia in clinical trials (including early-stage disease) and may have utility in other neurodegenerative diseases affecting speech or ocular control. ANN NEUROL 2025.

阅读过程中眼动的数字测量灵敏地捕捉眼球运动和语言功能障碍,共济失调的早期变化和疾病进展。
目的:在共济失调和其他神经退行性疾病的临床试验中需要敏感的行为测量。我们假设在自然多组分任务(文章阅读)中对眼球运动进行定量分析可以产生一种能够捕捉亚临床症状和疾病进展的测量方法。方法:采集102例共济失调患者(脊髓小脑性共济失调36例,弗里德赖希共济失调12例,多系统萎缩5例)和70例健康对照者的双眼注视频率为1000 Hz。在正在进行的Neurobooth自然历史研究中,有26名患有共济失调的参与者的纵向数据。阅读眼异常数字(READ)评分是通过训练一个回归模型来汇总扫视和注视运动学。结果:固定物平均位移、眼跳次数、频次、退行性眼跳比例与动眼肌功能障碍、言语功能障碍及整体共济失调严重程度有关。READ评分可靠(类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.96, p)解释:在临床试验(包括早期疾病)中,眼动的数字测量是一种有希望的灵敏测量共济失调的方法,并且可能在其他影响言语或眼睛控制的神经退行性疾病中也有应用。Ann neurol 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信