Inner and Outer Contextual Factors Impacting Mental Health and Criminal Legal Cross-Systems Collaborations.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Stacey L Barrenger, Leslie L Wood, Natalie Bonfine
{"title":"Inner and Outer Contextual Factors Impacting Mental Health and Criminal Legal Cross-Systems Collaborations.","authors":"Stacey L Barrenger, Leslie L Wood, Natalie Bonfine","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01474-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with serious mental illnesses continue to be overrepresented within the criminal legal system despite multiple diversion and reentry intervention efforts. Engaging in a coordinated systems-level approach to this problem has increased, as mental health criminal legal cross-systems collaborations, like Stepping Up and Sequential Intercept Mapping, proliferate across the United States. Despite their proliferation, little is known about how these cross-systems collaborations operate, including what factors are present and how these factors help or hinder group effectiveness. Stakeholders engaged in mental health criminal legal cross systems collaboration participated in focus groups and in-depth interviews. Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to guide the analysis, findings showed that inner, outer, and bridging factors feature predominately in cross-systems collaborations. Inner and outer contextual factors like leadership, values, funding, and data accessibility are important to their operations. Additionally, bridging factors of purveyors (engaging in technical assistance) and systems-level collaboration strategies (cross-training, sequential intercept mapping, and data sharing) were important to supporting sustainability. Future research should investigate which systems-level collaboration factors are tied to the implementation of new practices, programs, and policies which in turn may improve the behavioral healthcare system and health outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01474-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with serious mental illnesses continue to be overrepresented within the criminal legal system despite multiple diversion and reentry intervention efforts. Engaging in a coordinated systems-level approach to this problem has increased, as mental health criminal legal cross-systems collaborations, like Stepping Up and Sequential Intercept Mapping, proliferate across the United States. Despite their proliferation, little is known about how these cross-systems collaborations operate, including what factors are present and how these factors help or hinder group effectiveness. Stakeholders engaged in mental health criminal legal cross systems collaboration participated in focus groups and in-depth interviews. Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to guide the analysis, findings showed that inner, outer, and bridging factors feature predominately in cross-systems collaborations. Inner and outer contextual factors like leadership, values, funding, and data accessibility are important to their operations. Additionally, bridging factors of purveyors (engaging in technical assistance) and systems-level collaboration strategies (cross-training, sequential intercept mapping, and data sharing) were important to supporting sustainability. Future research should investigate which systems-level collaboration factors are tied to the implementation of new practices, programs, and policies which in turn may improve the behavioral healthcare system and health outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses.

影响心理健康和刑事法律跨系统合作的内部和外部背景因素。
尽管采取了多种转移和重返社会干预措施,但严重精神疾病患者在刑事司法系统中的比例仍然过高。随着精神卫生刑事法律跨系统合作(如Stepping Up和Sequential Intercept Mapping)在美国各地的扩散,对这一问题采取协调一致的系统级方法的情况有所增加。尽管它们的数量激增,但人们对这些跨系统协作如何运作知之甚少,包括存在哪些因素以及这些因素如何帮助或阻碍团队效率。从事精神卫生、刑事法律跨系统合作的利益攸关方参加了焦点小组和深度访谈。使用探索、准备、实施和维持框架来指导分析,结果表明内部、外部和桥接因素在跨系统协作中占主导地位。内部和外部环境因素,如领导力、价值观、资金和数据可访问性,对他们的运营很重要。此外,供应商(参与技术援助)和系统级协作策略(交叉培训、连续截取映射和数据共享)的桥梁因素对支持可持续性很重要。未来的研究应该调查哪些系统级协作因素与新实践、项目和政策的实施有关,这些新实践、项目和政策反过来可能会改善行为医疗保健系统和严重精神疾病患者的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信