Stacey L Barrenger, Leslie L Wood, Natalie Bonfine
{"title":"Inner and Outer Contextual Factors Impacting Mental Health and Criminal Legal Cross-Systems Collaborations.","authors":"Stacey L Barrenger, Leslie L Wood, Natalie Bonfine","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01474-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with serious mental illnesses continue to be overrepresented within the criminal legal system despite multiple diversion and reentry intervention efforts. Engaging in a coordinated systems-level approach to this problem has increased, as mental health criminal legal cross-systems collaborations, like Stepping Up and Sequential Intercept Mapping, proliferate across the United States. Despite their proliferation, little is known about how these cross-systems collaborations operate, including what factors are present and how these factors help or hinder group effectiveness. Stakeholders engaged in mental health criminal legal cross systems collaboration participated in focus groups and in-depth interviews. Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to guide the analysis, findings showed that inner, outer, and bridging factors feature predominately in cross-systems collaborations. Inner and outer contextual factors like leadership, values, funding, and data accessibility are important to their operations. Additionally, bridging factors of purveyors (engaging in technical assistance) and systems-level collaboration strategies (cross-training, sequential intercept mapping, and data sharing) were important to supporting sustainability. Future research should investigate which systems-level collaboration factors are tied to the implementation of new practices, programs, and policies which in turn may improve the behavioral healthcare system and health outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01474-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People with serious mental illnesses continue to be overrepresented within the criminal legal system despite multiple diversion and reentry intervention efforts. Engaging in a coordinated systems-level approach to this problem has increased, as mental health criminal legal cross-systems collaborations, like Stepping Up and Sequential Intercept Mapping, proliferate across the United States. Despite their proliferation, little is known about how these cross-systems collaborations operate, including what factors are present and how these factors help or hinder group effectiveness. Stakeholders engaged in mental health criminal legal cross systems collaboration participated in focus groups and in-depth interviews. Using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment framework to guide the analysis, findings showed that inner, outer, and bridging factors feature predominately in cross-systems collaborations. Inner and outer contextual factors like leadership, values, funding, and data accessibility are important to their operations. Additionally, bridging factors of purveyors (engaging in technical assistance) and systems-level collaboration strategies (cross-training, sequential intercept mapping, and data sharing) were important to supporting sustainability. Future research should investigate which systems-level collaboration factors are tied to the implementation of new practices, programs, and policies which in turn may improve the behavioral healthcare system and health outcomes for people with serious mental illnesses.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles. The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues. The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like. Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.