Complementarity and Fusion of FMCW and Wi-Fi Passive Radars for Pedestrian Flow Monitoring

IF 4.3 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Dejvi Cakoni;Laurent Storrer;Bruno Cornelis;Philippe De Doncker;François Horlin
{"title":"Complementarity and Fusion of FMCW and Wi-Fi Passive Radars for Pedestrian Flow Monitoring","authors":"Dejvi Cakoni;Laurent Storrer;Bruno Cornelis;Philippe De Doncker;François Horlin","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2025.3595215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the complementarity and fusion of two sensing technologies for pedestrian flow estimation: ubiquitous Wi-Fi based passive radar (WPR) and deployable frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) active radar, both combined with a convolutional neural network (CNN) for postprocessing. Wi-Fi signals, already widespread in many environments, enable passive, wide-area motion sensing without requiring additional infrastructure. FMCW radars, by contrast, offer high-resolution range-Doppler measurements and can be selectively deployed in target locations, such as pedestrian streets. We begin by individually evaluating the performance of FMCW and Wi-Fi passive radar systems in estimating pedestrians flow, highlighting their respective strengths, limitations, and complementarity. To further improve the system performance, we propose a fusion approach at both the decision and feature levels. For decision-level fusion, we implement majority voting and probability averaging strategies to combine the predictions from both radars. For feature-level fusion, we extract features from both radar systems using CNNs and merge them before classification. Our experimental results, from measurements collected on the same scene by the two radars, show that the fusion approaches significantly enhance the flow estimation accuracy compared to using either radar system alone. The feature-level fusion method, in particular, demonstrates superior performance by effectively integrating the spatial and motion information captured by both radar types. This work demonstrates the value of hybrid sensing systems that combine opportunistic and purpose-built technologies for reliable pedestrian counting and flow estimation in diverse urban scenarios and provides a robust framework for future developments in multisensor data fusion.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 18","pages":"35053-35065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11124438/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the complementarity and fusion of two sensing technologies for pedestrian flow estimation: ubiquitous Wi-Fi based passive radar (WPR) and deployable frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) active radar, both combined with a convolutional neural network (CNN) for postprocessing. Wi-Fi signals, already widespread in many environments, enable passive, wide-area motion sensing without requiring additional infrastructure. FMCW radars, by contrast, offer high-resolution range-Doppler measurements and can be selectively deployed in target locations, such as pedestrian streets. We begin by individually evaluating the performance of FMCW and Wi-Fi passive radar systems in estimating pedestrians flow, highlighting their respective strengths, limitations, and complementarity. To further improve the system performance, we propose a fusion approach at both the decision and feature levels. For decision-level fusion, we implement majority voting and probability averaging strategies to combine the predictions from both radars. For feature-level fusion, we extract features from both radar systems using CNNs and merge them before classification. Our experimental results, from measurements collected on the same scene by the two radars, show that the fusion approaches significantly enhance the flow estimation accuracy compared to using either radar system alone. The feature-level fusion method, in particular, demonstrates superior performance by effectively integrating the spatial and motion information captured by both radar types. This work demonstrates the value of hybrid sensing systems that combine opportunistic and purpose-built technologies for reliable pedestrian counting and flow estimation in diverse urban scenarios and provides a robust framework for future developments in multisensor data fusion.
FMCW与Wi-Fi无源雷达在行人流量监测中的互补与融合
本研究探讨了两种用于行人流量估计的传感技术的互补和融合:无处不在的基于Wi-Fi的无源雷达(WPR)和可部署调频连续波(FMCW)有源雷达,两者都结合了卷积神经网络(CNN)进行后处理。Wi-Fi信号已经在许多环境中广泛应用,无需额外的基础设施即可实现被动的广域运动传感。相比之下,FMCW雷达提供高分辨率距离多普勒测量,可以选择性地部署在目标位置,如步行街。我们首先分别评估了FMCW和Wi-Fi无源雷达系统在估计行人流量方面的性能,突出了它们各自的优势、局限性和互补性。为了进一步提高系统的性能,我们提出了一种决策层和特征层的融合方法。对于决策级融合,我们实现了多数投票和概率平均策略来组合来自两个雷达的预测。对于特征级融合,我们使用cnn从两个雷达系统中提取特征,并在分类前进行合并。实验结果表明,与单独使用任何一种雷达系统相比,融合方法显著提高了流量估计精度。特别是特征级融合方法,通过有效地整合两种雷达捕获的空间和运动信息,展示了优越的性能。这项工作证明了混合传感系统的价值,该系统结合了机会主义和专用技术,可在不同的城市场景中进行可靠的行人计数和流量估计,并为未来多传感器数据融合的发展提供了强大的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
2058
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following: -Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation -Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication -Chemical and Gas Sensors -Microfluidics and Biosensors -Optical Sensors -Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others -Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors -Sensor Packaging -Sensor Networks -Sensor Applications -Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces -Actuators and Sensor Power Systems -Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting -Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data) -Sensors in Industrial Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信