Impact of Changes in Liver Allocation System on the Utility of Donor Liver Biopsy for Liver Transplantation.

IF 0.8
Amir Ebadinejad, Leah Aakjar, Jennifer M Brewer, David O'Sullivan, Wasim Dar, Michael Einstein, Glyn Morgan, Bishoy Emmanuel, Eva U Sotil, Elizabeth Richardson, Colin Swales, Oscar K Serrano
{"title":"Impact of Changes in Liver Allocation System on the Utility of Donor Liver Biopsy for Liver Transplantation.","authors":"Amir Ebadinejad, Leah Aakjar, Jennifer M Brewer, David O'Sullivan, Wasim Dar, Michael Einstein, Glyn Morgan, Bishoy Emmanuel, Eva U Sotil, Elizabeth Richardson, Colin Swales, Oscar K Serrano","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of the acuity circles (AC) deceased donor liver allocation policy on graft utilization remains unclear, with recent studies suggesting a decline in liver utilization despite an increase in potential donors. This study aimed to compare deceased donor liver biopsy (DDLB) rates and identify factors associated with DDLB utilization before and after AC implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, dividing donors into pre-AC (Jan 2018-Feb 2020) and post-AC (Feb 2020-June 2021) periods. The study included 16,969 donor's pre-AC and 11,156 donor's post-AC, categorized into DDLB and non-DDLB groups. Primary endpoints included DDLB rates, graft nonuse rates, patient survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS). Statistical analyses involved chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DDLB utilization increased from 38.2% pre-AC to 40.8% post-AC (P < .001). Post-AC, the DDLB group had a higher proportion of male donors and older donors. One-year patient survival rates decreased post-AC in both groups (P < .001), while DCGS rates remained stable. Graft nonuse rates showed no significant differences. Multivariate analysis identified the AC policy, donor age, diabetes, and donation after circulatory death as significant predictors of DDLB use, with the AC policy independently increasing DDLB likelihood by 20% (OR = 1.2, CI: 1.13-1.26, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AC policy has led to increased DDLB utilization, likely due to broader recipient selection. These findings suggest the need for standardized guidelines to optimize DDLB use while balancing recipient selection with associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.09.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of the acuity circles (AC) deceased donor liver allocation policy on graft utilization remains unclear, with recent studies suggesting a decline in liver utilization despite an increase in potential donors. This study aimed to compare deceased donor liver biopsy (DDLB) rates and identify factors associated with DDLB utilization before and after AC implementation.

Methods: Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, dividing donors into pre-AC (Jan 2018-Feb 2020) and post-AC (Feb 2020-June 2021) periods. The study included 16,969 donor's pre-AC and 11,156 donor's post-AC, categorized into DDLB and non-DDLB groups. Primary endpoints included DDLB rates, graft nonuse rates, patient survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS). Statistical analyses involved chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: DDLB utilization increased from 38.2% pre-AC to 40.8% post-AC (P < .001). Post-AC, the DDLB group had a higher proportion of male donors and older donors. One-year patient survival rates decreased post-AC in both groups (P < .001), while DCGS rates remained stable. Graft nonuse rates showed no significant differences. Multivariate analysis identified the AC policy, donor age, diabetes, and donation after circulatory death as significant predictors of DDLB use, with the AC policy independently increasing DDLB likelihood by 20% (OR = 1.2, CI: 1.13-1.26, P < .001).

Conclusion: The AC policy has led to increased DDLB utilization, likely due to broader recipient selection. These findings suggest the need for standardized guidelines to optimize DDLB use while balancing recipient selection with associated risks.

肝脏分配制度的变化对肝移植供肝活检的影响。
导论:acuity circles (AC)已故供体肝脏分配政策对移植物利用率的影响尚不清楚,最近的研究表明,尽管潜在供体增加,但肝脏利用率下降。本研究旨在比较已故供体肝活检(DDLB)率,并确定AC实施前后DDLB利用率的相关因素。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年6月移植受者科学登记处(SRTR)的数据,将供体分为移植前(2018年1月至2020年2月)和移植后(2020年2月至2021年6月)。该研究包括16,969例供体ac前和11156例供体ac后,分为DDLB组和非DDLB组。主要终点包括DDLB率、移植物不使用率、患者生存和死亡审查的移植物生存(DCGS)。统计分析包括卡方检验、t检验和多元逻辑回归。结果:DDLB利用率由ac前的38.2%上升至ac后的40.8% (P < 0.001)。ac后,DDLB组男性献血者和老年献血者比例较高。两组患者的1年生存率均下降(P < 0.001),而DCGS率保持稳定。移植物不使用率差异无统计学意义。多因素分析发现,AC政策、供者年龄、糖尿病和循环死亡后捐赠是DDLB使用的重要预测因素,AC政策单独增加了20%的DDLB可能性(OR = 1.2, CI: 1.13-1.26, P < 0.001)。结论:AC政策导致DDLB使用率增加,可能是由于更广泛的受体选择。这些发现表明,需要制定标准化的指南来优化DDLB的使用,同时平衡受体选择和相关风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信