Frailty and Postoperative Outcomes Following Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: A Scoping Review.

IF 0.7
Sofia E Olsson, Ashleigh Halderman, Matthew W Ryan, Bradley F Marple, Sei Y Chung
{"title":"Frailty and Postoperative Outcomes Following Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sofia E Olsson, Ashleigh Halderman, Matthew W Ryan, Bradley F Marple, Sei Y Chung","doi":"10.1177/01455613251371434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased frailty has been associated with worse outcomes in various surgical specialties. In endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS), the relationship between frailty and outcomes has been examined to some degree.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to consolidate the current literature, analyzing relationships between frailty and EESBS postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review of frailty in EESBS was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Initial search yielded a total of 408 articles, which were reduced using the PRISMA model. Four studies published between 2020 and 2023 fit the inclusion criteria for this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1306 patients were captured with an average age of 54.1 years. All studies discussed modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5). Two studies utilized American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and 3 studies examined Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as additional frailty measures. Higher mFI-5 was significantly associated with prolonged length of stay and readmission. Higher ASA was significantly associated with increased rates of Clavien-Dindo IV complications and permanent postoperative diabetes insipidus. CCI was not associated with any of the postoperative complications studied. Frailty was not strongly associated with worsened surgical complications, endocrine dysfunction, visual outcomes, and quality of life after EESBS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty may serve as a useful tool in anticipating certain postoperative outcomes following EESBS. However, further research is necessary examining frailty specifically within endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base, rather than open or microscopic approaches. In addition, future studies need to be consistent in which frailty indices are used, and how frailty data are analyzed for effective conclusions to be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251371434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251371434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased frailty has been associated with worse outcomes in various surgical specialties. In endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS), the relationship between frailty and outcomes has been examined to some degree.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to consolidate the current literature, analyzing relationships between frailty and EESBS postoperative outcomes.

Methods: A scoping review of frailty in EESBS was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. Initial search yielded a total of 408 articles, which were reduced using the PRISMA model. Four studies published between 2020 and 2023 fit the inclusion criteria for this review.

Results: A total of 1306 patients were captured with an average age of 54.1 years. All studies discussed modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5). Two studies utilized American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and 3 studies examined Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as additional frailty measures. Higher mFI-5 was significantly associated with prolonged length of stay and readmission. Higher ASA was significantly associated with increased rates of Clavien-Dindo IV complications and permanent postoperative diabetes insipidus. CCI was not associated with any of the postoperative complications studied. Frailty was not strongly associated with worsened surgical complications, endocrine dysfunction, visual outcomes, and quality of life after EESBS.

Conclusion: Frailty may serve as a useful tool in anticipating certain postoperative outcomes following EESBS. However, further research is necessary examining frailty specifically within endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base, rather than open or microscopic approaches. In addition, future studies need to be consistent in which frailty indices are used, and how frailty data are analyzed for effective conclusions to be made.

内窥镜鼻内颅底手术后的虚弱和术后结果:范围审查。
背景:在不同的外科专科,虚弱的增加与较差的预后有关。在内窥镜鼻内颅底手术(EESBS)中,虚弱和预后之间的关系已经在一定程度上进行了研究。目的:本综述旨在巩固现有文献,分析虚弱与EESBS术后预后之间的关系。方法:在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Ovid Medline、Web of Science、Embase和谷歌Scholar上对EESBS的脆弱性进行范围综述。最初的搜索总共产生了408篇文章,使用PRISMA模型进行了减少。2020年至2023年间发表的四项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。结果:共捕获患者1306例,平均年龄54.1岁。所有的研究都讨论了改良的脆弱指数-5 (mFI-5)。2项研究采用了美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的分类,3项研究采用了Charlson共病指数(CCI)作为额外的虚弱指标。较高的mFI-5与住院时间延长和再入院显著相关。较高的ASA与Clavien-Dindo IV并发症和永久性术后尿崩症发生率的增加显著相关。CCI与所研究的任何术后并发症无关。虚弱与EESBS后手术并发症、内分泌功能障碍、视力结果和生活质量的恶化没有很强的相关性。结论:虚弱可以作为预测EESBS术后某些结果的有用工具。然而,进一步的研究是必要的,特别是在内镜下鼻内入路颅底检查虚弱,而不是开放或显微镜下入路。此外,未来的研究需要在脆弱性指标的使用上保持一致,以及如何分析脆弱性数据以得出有效的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信