Acute and Chronic Effect of Resistance Training on Cardiac Autonomic Function in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.
{"title":"Acute and Chronic Effect of Resistance Training on Cardiac Autonomic Function in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Aziza Nazneen, Aqsa Mujaddadi, Saima Zaki","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-4-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of resistance training (RT) on cardiac autonomic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202127541). A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using predefined search criteria. Studies were included if RT was the primary intervention and autonomic markers were assessed in COPD patients. Research involving other exercise types or significant comorbidities was excluded. From 5,159 records, five studies comprising 129 participants met the criteria. Interventions varied from single acute RT sessions to training programs lasting up to eight weeks. All studies measured heart rate variability (HRV), with most reporting significant improvements in time-domain measures and mixed results for frequency-domain parameters. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool, and evidence quality was appraised using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Acute RT produced immediate but short-lived changes in autonomic function, while chronic RT consistently improved HRV time-domain indices. RT appears to beneficially influence cardiac autonomic regulation in COPD patients, as reflected by enhanced HRV parameters. These results support RT's role in addressing both muscular and cardiovascular health in this population. However, the limited number of studies, methodological differences, and serious risk of bias highlight the need for larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to strengthen the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-4-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of resistance training (RT) on cardiac autonomic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202127541). A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using predefined search criteria. Studies were included if RT was the primary intervention and autonomic markers were assessed in COPD patients. Research involving other exercise types or significant comorbidities was excluded. From 5,159 records, five studies comprising 129 participants met the criteria. Interventions varied from single acute RT sessions to training programs lasting up to eight weeks. All studies measured heart rate variability (HRV), with most reporting significant improvements in time-domain measures and mixed results for frequency-domain parameters. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool, and evidence quality was appraised using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Acute RT produced immediate but short-lived changes in autonomic function, while chronic RT consistently improved HRV time-domain indices. RT appears to beneficially influence cardiac autonomic regulation in COPD patients, as reflected by enhanced HRV parameters. These results support RT's role in addressing both muscular and cardiovascular health in this population. However, the limited number of studies, methodological differences, and serious risk of bias highlight the need for larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to strengthen the evidence base.
本系统综述旨在评估抗阻训练(RT)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者心脏自主神经功能的急性和慢性影响。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,本综述在PROSPERO注册(CRD4202127541)。使用预定义的搜索标准在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus上进行系统搜索。如果RT是主要干预措施,并评估COPD患者的自主神经标志物,则纳入研究。涉及其他运动类型或显著合并症的研究被排除在外。从5159项记录中,有5项研究包括129名参与者符合标准。干预措施从单一急性RT疗程到长达8周的培训计划不等。所有的研究都测量了心率变异性(HRV),大多数研究都报告了时域测量的显著改善,而频域参数的结果则好坏参半。偏倚风险采用干预措施非随机研究的偏倚风险评估工具进行评估,证据质量采用推荐分级评估、发展和评价方法进行评估。急性RT产生立即但短暂的自主神经功能改变,而慢性RT持续改善HRV时域指标。通过HRV参数的增强,RT似乎对COPD患者的心脏自主调节有有益的影响。这些结果支持RT在解决这一人群的肌肉和心血管健康方面的作用。然而,由于研究数量有限、方法差异和严重的偏倚风险,需要更大规模、设计良好的随机对照试验来加强证据基础。