Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Strength and Lung Function on Functional Exercise Capacity in Post-myocardial Infarction Patients: A Cross-sectional Study.

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Rıdvan Aktan, Özge Ocaker Aktan, Sevgi Özalevli, Hüseyin Dursun
{"title":"Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Strength and Lung Function on Functional Exercise Capacity in Post-myocardial Infarction Patients: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Rıdvan Aktan, Özge Ocaker Aktan, Sevgi Özalevli, Hüseyin Dursun","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-7-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the contribution of lung function and respiratory muscle strength in predicting functional exercise capacity in post-myocardial infarction (MI) subjects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 56 stable post-MI subjects. Lung function was assessed using a digital spirometer, and respiratory muscle strength was measured using an intraoral pressure meter. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was conducted to assess functional exercise capacity. Correlations and multiple regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of 6MWD, considering demographic factors, lung function, and respiratory muscle strength. The Bland-Altman plot was used to investigate the agreement between observed and predicted 6MWDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant positive correlations were found between 6MWD and forced vital capacity (FVC)<sub>%predicted</sub> (r = 0.528, <i>P</i> = 0.022) and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)<sub>%predicted</sub> (r = 0.640, <i>P</i> = 0.022). Age (r = -0.350, <i>P</i> = 0.008) and body mass index (BMI) (r= -0.561, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were negatively correlated with 6MWD. The best regression model included MIP<sub>%predicted</sub> (<i>β</i> = 0.332, <i>P</i> = 0.002), BMI (<i>β</i> = -0.264, <i>P</i> = 0.012), being male (<i>β</i> = 0.262, <i>P</i> = 0.003), age (<i>β</i> = -0.210, <i>P</i> = 0.020), and FVC<sub>%predicted</sub> (<i>β</i> = 0.219, <i>P</i> = 0.026) as significant unique contributors. The final multiple linear regression model was significant [F (5, 50) = 19.08, <i>P</i> < 0.001] and explained 65.6% of the variance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.656) in the 6MWD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung function and respiratory muscle strength significantly contribute to functional exercise capacity in post-MI. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive respiratory function assessments in rehabilitation strategies to improve exercise capacity in patients with post-MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2025-7-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the contribution of lung function and respiratory muscle strength in predicting functional exercise capacity in post-myocardial infarction (MI) subjects.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included 56 stable post-MI subjects. Lung function was assessed using a digital spirometer, and respiratory muscle strength was measured using an intraoral pressure meter. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) was conducted to assess functional exercise capacity. Correlations and multiple regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of 6MWD, considering demographic factors, lung function, and respiratory muscle strength. The Bland-Altman plot was used to investigate the agreement between observed and predicted 6MWDs.

Results: Significant positive correlations were found between 6MWD and forced vital capacity (FVC)%predicted (r = 0.528, P = 0.022) and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)%predicted (r = 0.640, P = 0.022). Age (r = -0.350, P = 0.008) and body mass index (BMI) (r= -0.561, P < 0.001) were negatively correlated with 6MWD. The best regression model included MIP%predicted (β = 0.332, P = 0.002), BMI (β = -0.264, P = 0.012), being male (β = 0.262, P = 0.003), age (β = -0.210, P = 0.020), and FVC%predicted (β = 0.219, P = 0.026) as significant unique contributors. The final multiple linear regression model was significant [F (5, 50) = 19.08, P < 0.001] and explained 65.6% of the variance (R2 = 0.656) in the 6MWD.

Conclusion: Lung function and respiratory muscle strength significantly contribute to functional exercise capacity in post-MI. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive respiratory function assessments in rehabilitation strategies to improve exercise capacity in patients with post-MI.

吸气肌力量和肺功能对心肌梗死后患者功能性运动能力的影响:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨肺功能和呼吸肌力量在预测心肌梗死(MI)后患者功能运动能力中的作用。材料和方法:本横断面研究包括56名稳定的心肌梗死后受试者。使用数字肺活量计评估肺功能,使用口内压力计测量呼吸肌力量。6分钟步行距离(6MWD)评估功能运动能力。考虑人口统计学因素、肺功能和呼吸肌力量,采用相关性和多元回归分析来评估6MWD的预测因素。Bland-Altman图用于调查观测值与预测值之间的一致性。结果:6MWD与预测用力肺活量(FVC)% (r = 0.528, P = 0.022)、最大吸气压力(MIP)% (r = 0.640, P = 0.022)呈显著正相关。年龄(r= -0.350, P = 0.008)、体质指数(BMI) (r= -0.561, P < 0.001)与6MWD呈负相关。最佳回归模型包括预测的MIP% (β = 0.332, P = 0.002)、BMI (β = -0.264, P = 0.012)、男性(β = 0.262, P = 0.003)、年龄(β = -0.210, P = 0.020)和预测的FVC% (β = 0.219, P = 0.026)为显著的独特影响因子。最终的多元线性回归模型具有显著性[F (5,50) = 19.08, P < 0.001],解释了6MWD中65.6%的方差(R2 = 0.656)。结论:肺功能和呼吸肌力量对心肌梗死后的功能性运动能力有显著影响。本研究强调了综合呼吸功能评估在改善心肌梗死后患者运动能力的康复策略中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信