Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in vertebral surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Korean Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.3344/kjp.25149
Alessandro De Cassai, Maria Bisi, Marco Nardelli, Irene Paiusco, Serafino Talarico, Valentina Fincati, Burhan Dost, Annalisa Boscolo, Paolo Navalesi
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in vertebral surgery: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","authors":"Alessandro De Cassai, Maria Bisi, Marco Nardelli, Irene Paiusco, Serafino Talarico, Valentina Fincati, Burhan Dost, Annalisa Boscolo, Paolo Navalesi","doi":"10.3344/kjp.25149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has gained attention as a regional anesthesia technique for pain management in vertebral surgeries. This umbrella review synthesizes data from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of the ESP block in reducing postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing vertebral surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted in CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed Central, and Scopus from 2016 to 2025. The authors included SRs and meta-analyses that investigated the use of the ESP block in vertebral surgeries. Primary outcomes were opioid consumption at 24 postoperative hours (measured as milligrams of morphine equivalent), pain scores at 12 and 24 hours, PONV incidence, and the need for additional analgesics. Quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen SRs were included. The ESP block reduced opioid consumption at 24 postoperative hours (mean morphine equivalents difference, -8.70 to -18.69), although high heterogeneity was observed. Pain reduction at 12 and 24 hours was statistically significant but clinically modest, with most SRs reporting reductions of less than one point in Numeric Rating Scale or Visual Analog Scale pain scales. The ESP block also significantly reduced PONV and additional analgesic use. However, most SRs were rated as low quality due to inadequate pre-registration and justification for excluding studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESP block demonstrates potential as a multimodal analgesia component in vertebral surgeries, reducing opioid consumption, pain intensity, and PONV. However, high heterogeneity and low methodological quality highlight the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"437-448"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.25149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has gained attention as a regional anesthesia technique for pain management in vertebral surgeries. This umbrella review synthesizes data from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of the ESP block in reducing postoperative opioid consumption, pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing vertebral surgeries.

Methods: A search was conducted in CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed Central, and Scopus from 2016 to 2025. The authors included SRs and meta-analyses that investigated the use of the ESP block in vertebral surgeries. Primary outcomes were opioid consumption at 24 postoperative hours (measured as milligrams of morphine equivalent), pain scores at 12 and 24 hours, PONV incidence, and the need for additional analgesics. Quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool.

Results: Thirteen SRs were included. The ESP block reduced opioid consumption at 24 postoperative hours (mean morphine equivalents difference, -8.70 to -18.69), although high heterogeneity was observed. Pain reduction at 12 and 24 hours was statistically significant but clinically modest, with most SRs reporting reductions of less than one point in Numeric Rating Scale or Visual Analog Scale pain scales. The ESP block also significantly reduced PONV and additional analgesic use. However, most SRs were rated as low quality due to inadequate pre-registration and justification for excluding studies.

Conclusions: The ESP block demonstrates potential as a multimodal analgesia component in vertebral surgeries, reducing opioid consumption, pain intensity, and PONV. However, high heterogeneity and low methodological quality highlight the need for further research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

竖脊肌平面阻滞用于椎体手术术后镇痛:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞作为椎体手术疼痛管理的区域麻醉技术已引起人们的关注。本综述综合了来自系统综述(SRs)和meta分析的数据,以评估ESP阻滞在减少椎骨手术患者术后阿片类药物消耗、疼痛和术后恶心呕吐(PONV)方面的有效性。方法:检索2016 - 2025年CENTRAL、Embase、PubMed CENTRAL和Scopus。作者纳入了SRs和荟萃分析,调查了ESP阻滞在椎体手术中的应用。主要结局是术后24小时的阿片类药物消耗(以吗啡当量毫克数衡量),12和24小时的疼痛评分,PONV发生率,以及额外镇痛药的需求。使用AMSTAR 2工具评估质量。结果:纳入13例SRs。ESP阻断减少了术后24小时阿片类药物的消耗(平均吗啡当量差异,-8.70至-18.69),尽管观察到高度异质性。12和24小时的疼痛减轻在统计学上是显著的,但在临床上是适度的,大多数SRs报告的疼痛减轻在数字评定量表或视觉模拟量表中不到1分。ESP阻滞也显著减少了PONV和额外的镇痛使用。然而,由于不充分的预登记和排除研究的理由,大多数SRs被评为低质量。结论:ESP阻滞显示了在椎体手术中作为一种多模式镇痛成分的潜力,可以减少阿片类药物的消耗、疼痛强度和PONV。然而,高异质性和低方法学质量突出了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信