Exploring the learning process of patient education delivery: a qualitative study of physical therapy students in inpatient clinical education.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Grant D Bitzer, Shelby D Vaughn
{"title":"Exploring the learning process of patient education delivery: a qualitative study of physical therapy students in inpatient clinical education.","authors":"Grant D Bitzer, Shelby D Vaughn","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10475-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective patient education improves health outcomes, yet physical therapists and student physical therapists (SPTs) often report low self-efficacy and inadequate preparation for delivering education in clinical settings. While experiential learning enhances communication and confidence, most training occurs in classroom or simulated environments. Limited research has examined how SPTs develop patient education skills during real clinical interactions. This qualitative case study explored how SPTs describe their experiential learning cycle when providing patient education during an inpatient integrated clinical education (ICE) experience. Kolb's experiential learning theory guided the study design and data analysis within a constructivist research paradigm. Data sources included direct observation of inpatient care, semi-structured interviews, and qualitative surveys with nine second-year DPT students from a U.S.-based program. A deductive thematic analysis was conducted using the stages of Kolb's learning cycle as an organizing framework. Four themes were identified. First, students engaged in diverse patient education experiences shaped by clinical context and patient complexity. Second, opportunities for reflection were variable and often lacked structure. Third, students developed new ideas about effective education strategies, including communication adaptations, use of educational materials, and family involvement. Fourth, their ability to apply these ideas fluctuated based on environmental conditions and educator support. This study provides insight into how SPTs progress through experiential learning in real-time clinical settings. Findings underscore the importance of embedding structured reflection and purposeful practice into ICE curricula to better support student development. Improved curricular design may enhance student preparedness and promote effective, patient-centered communication in physical therapy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10475-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective patient education improves health outcomes, yet physical therapists and student physical therapists (SPTs) often report low self-efficacy and inadequate preparation for delivering education in clinical settings. While experiential learning enhances communication and confidence, most training occurs in classroom or simulated environments. Limited research has examined how SPTs develop patient education skills during real clinical interactions. This qualitative case study explored how SPTs describe their experiential learning cycle when providing patient education during an inpatient integrated clinical education (ICE) experience. Kolb's experiential learning theory guided the study design and data analysis within a constructivist research paradigm. Data sources included direct observation of inpatient care, semi-structured interviews, and qualitative surveys with nine second-year DPT students from a U.S.-based program. A deductive thematic analysis was conducted using the stages of Kolb's learning cycle as an organizing framework. Four themes were identified. First, students engaged in diverse patient education experiences shaped by clinical context and patient complexity. Second, opportunities for reflection were variable and often lacked structure. Third, students developed new ideas about effective education strategies, including communication adaptations, use of educational materials, and family involvement. Fourth, their ability to apply these ideas fluctuated based on environmental conditions and educator support. This study provides insight into how SPTs progress through experiential learning in real-time clinical settings. Findings underscore the importance of embedding structured reflection and purposeful practice into ICE curricula to better support student development. Improved curricular design may enhance student preparedness and promote effective, patient-centered communication in physical therapy practice.

探索患者教育传递的学习过程:物理治疗学生住院临床教育的定性研究。
有效的患者教育可以改善健康结果,然而物理治疗师和学生物理治疗师(spt)经常报告自我效能低,并且在临床环境中提供教育的准备不足。虽然体验式学习可以增强沟通和自信,但大多数培训都是在教室或模拟环境中进行的。有限的研究考察了spt如何在真实的临床互动中发展患者教育技能。本定性案例研究探讨了spt在住院综合临床教育(ICE)期间提供患者教育时如何描述他们的体验式学习周期。Kolb的体验学习理论指导了建构主义研究范式下的研究设计和数据分析。数据来源包括住院治疗的直接观察、半结构化访谈和对来自美国一个项目的9名DPT二年级学生的定性调查。采用科尔布的学习周期阶段作为组织框架,进行了演绎主题分析。确定了四个主题。首先,学生参与由临床环境和患者复杂性塑造的多样化患者教育经验。其次,反思的机会是多变的,往往缺乏结构。第三,学生对有效的教育策略产生了新的想法,包括沟通适应、教材的使用和家庭参与。第四,他们运用这些思想的能力因环境条件和教育者的支持而波动。这项研究提供了spt如何通过实时临床环境中的体验式学习取得进展的见解。研究结果强调了在ICE课程中嵌入结构化反思和有目的的实践以更好地支持学生发展的重要性。改进的课程设计可以提高学生的准备,促进有效的,以病人为中心的交流在物理治疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信