History of strabismus management and treatment.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tristan Jurkiewicz
{"title":"History of strabismus management and treatment.","authors":"Tristan Jurkiewicz","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2557250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strabismus has been described since antiquity and was attributed to obscure phenomena or anatomical anomalies. The aim of this article is to examine the evolution of knowledge about strabismus and the treatments used to manage it over the centuries. This review helps us to understand how modern approaches emerged.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliographical study of the history of strabismus was carried out using the Gallica platform of the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF). This article is based on nearly a hundred books covering a period from 1598 to 1914.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the Renaissance, knowledge about strabismus and its treatment primarily was based on texts authored by ancient medical practitioners. However, these approaches were largely ineffective due to limited understanding of the oculomotor system, for example with the face mask of Paul Aegineta. Strabismus in children was often attributed to factors like improper cradle positioning or imitation of affected individuals. Significant progress was made in the 18th century, leading to the development of the first treatment for amblyopia around 1750. This significant advance came from De Buffon, who suggested that strabismus resulted from a difference in the \"strength\" of the two eyes, and that covering the stronger eye would restore balance. Despite these improvements, controversies persisted about the causes of strabismus, its classifications, and the relationship with vision. By the early 19th century, detailed studies on the physiology of the eye muscles marked a turning point and paved the way for the first strabismus surgery. The procedure imagined by Dieffenbach gave initial promising results, but complications arose in many cases, such as the reappearance of strabismus or the appearance of a strabismus in the opposite direction. Later, the discovery of hyperopia and studies of binocular vision led to further advances in treatment and the development of rehabilitation methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collectively, these advancements transformed the understanding and management of strabismus, marking crucial milestones in the history of ophthalmology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2557250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Strabismus has been described since antiquity and was attributed to obscure phenomena or anatomical anomalies. The aim of this article is to examine the evolution of knowledge about strabismus and the treatments used to manage it over the centuries. This review helps us to understand how modern approaches emerged.

Methods: A bibliographical study of the history of strabismus was carried out using the Gallica platform of the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF). This article is based on nearly a hundred books covering a period from 1598 to 1914.

Results: During the Renaissance, knowledge about strabismus and its treatment primarily was based on texts authored by ancient medical practitioners. However, these approaches were largely ineffective due to limited understanding of the oculomotor system, for example with the face mask of Paul Aegineta. Strabismus in children was often attributed to factors like improper cradle positioning or imitation of affected individuals. Significant progress was made in the 18th century, leading to the development of the first treatment for amblyopia around 1750. This significant advance came from De Buffon, who suggested that strabismus resulted from a difference in the "strength" of the two eyes, and that covering the stronger eye would restore balance. Despite these improvements, controversies persisted about the causes of strabismus, its classifications, and the relationship with vision. By the early 19th century, detailed studies on the physiology of the eye muscles marked a turning point and paved the way for the first strabismus surgery. The procedure imagined by Dieffenbach gave initial promising results, but complications arose in many cases, such as the reappearance of strabismus or the appearance of a strabismus in the opposite direction. Later, the discovery of hyperopia and studies of binocular vision led to further advances in treatment and the development of rehabilitation methods.

Conclusion: Collectively, these advancements transformed the understanding and management of strabismus, marking crucial milestones in the history of ophthalmology.

斜视的管理和治疗史。
背景:斜视自古以来就有描述,并归因于模糊现象或解剖异常。这篇文章的目的是检查关于斜视的知识的演变和治疗方法用于管理它的几个世纪。这一回顾有助于我们理解现代方法是如何出现的。方法:利用法国国家图书馆(BnF)的Gallica平台对斜视史进行文献研究。这篇文章是基于从1598年到1914年的近百本书。结果:在文艺复兴时期,关于斜视及其治疗的知识主要是基于古代医生撰写的文本。然而,由于对动眼肌系统的了解有限,这些方法在很大程度上是无效的,例如Paul Aegineta的面罩。儿童斜视通常归因于不适当的摇篮位置或受影响个体的模仿等因素。18世纪取得了重大进展,导致了1750年左右弱视的第一个治疗方法的发展。这一重大进展来自德·布冯,他认为斜视是由两只眼睛“力量”的差异造成的,遮住较强的那只眼睛可以恢复平衡。尽管取得了这些进步,但关于斜视的原因、分类以及与视力的关系的争论仍然存在。到19世纪初,对眼部肌肉生理学的详细研究标志着一个转折点,为第一次斜视手术铺平了道路。Dieffenbach设想的手术最初取得了令人满意的结果,但在许多病例中出现了并发症,例如斜视再次出现或相反方向的斜视出现。后来,远视的发现和双目视力的研究导致了治疗和康复方法的进一步发展。结论:总的来说,这些进步改变了对斜视的认识和治疗,标志着眼科学历史上的重要里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信