Optimal minimal stent area after crossover stenting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ju Hyeon Kim, Do-Yoon Kang, Jung-Min Ahn, Jihoon Kweon, Jihye Chae, Seong-Bong Wee, Soo Yeon An, Hansu Park, Soo-Jin Kang, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park
{"title":"Optimal minimal stent area after crossover stenting in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.","authors":"Ju Hyeon Kim, Do-Yoon Kang, Jung-Min Ahn, Jihoon Kweon, Jihye Chae, Seong-Bong Wee, Soo Yeon An, Hansu Park, Soo-Jin Kang, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park","doi":"10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has demonstrated clinical benefit over angiography-guided PCI for left main coronary artery (LM) disease. However, the optimal minimal stent area (MSA) thresholds to predict cardiovascular outcomes remain incompletely defined.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-measured segmental MSA after LM crossover stenting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 829 consecutive patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI for unprotected LM disease using a single-stent crossover technique. The final MSA was measured at the proximal LM, distal LM, and left anterior descending artery (LAD) ostium. The primary outcome was 5-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MSA cutoff values best predicting 5-year MACE were 11.4 mm² for the proximal LM (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62), 8.4 mm² for the distal LM (AUC 0.58), and 8.1 mm² for the LAD ostium (AUC 0.57). Based on these cutoff values, stent underexpansion in the proximal LM was significantly associated with increased risk of 5-year MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.34; p<0.001). Additionally, patients with simultaneous stent underexpansion in both the distal LM and LAD ostium exhibited a significantly higher risk of 5-year MACE compared with those having adequate expansion or only single-site underexpansion (adjusted HR 2.57; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieving sufficient stent expansion in the proximal LM and preventing underexpansion in both the distal LM and LAD ostium are critical for improving long-term clinical outcomes. The identified MSA thresholds may serve as practical benchmarks for stent optimisation during LM PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54378,"journal":{"name":"Eurointervention","volume":"21 18","pages":"e1069-e1080"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracoronary imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has demonstrated clinical benefit over angiography-guided PCI for left main coronary artery (LM) disease. However, the optimal minimal stent area (MSA) thresholds to predict cardiovascular outcomes remain incompletely defined.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-measured segmental MSA after LM crossover stenting.

Methods: We identified 829 consecutive patients who underwent IVUS-guided PCI for unprotected LM disease using a single-stent crossover technique. The final MSA was measured at the proximal LM, distal LM, and left anterior descending artery (LAD) ostium. The primary outcome was 5-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.

Results: The MSA cutoff values best predicting 5-year MACE were 11.4 mm² for the proximal LM (area under the curve [AUC] 0.62), 8.4 mm² for the distal LM (AUC 0.58), and 8.1 mm² for the LAD ostium (AUC 0.57). Based on these cutoff values, stent underexpansion in the proximal LM was significantly associated with increased risk of 5-year MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.34; p<0.001). Additionally, patients with simultaneous stent underexpansion in both the distal LM and LAD ostium exhibited a significantly higher risk of 5-year MACE compared with those having adequate expansion or only single-site underexpansion (adjusted HR 2.57; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Achieving sufficient stent expansion in the proximal LM and preventing underexpansion in both the distal LM and LAD ostium are critical for improving long-term clinical outcomes. The identified MSA thresholds may serve as practical benchmarks for stent optimisation during LM PCI.

无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者交叉支架置入术后最佳最小支架面积。
背景:冠状动脉内成像引导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已经证明比血管造影引导下的左主干冠状动脉介入治疗(LM)的临床疗效更好。然而,预测心血管预后的最佳最小支架面积(MSA)阈值仍未完全确定。目的:本研究旨在评估LM交叉支架术后血管内超声(IVUS)测量的节段MSA。方法:我们确定了829例使用单支架交叉技术接受ivus引导的无保护LM疾病PCI治疗的连续患者。在LM近端、LM远端和左前降支(LAD)口测量最终MSA。主要终点是5年主要心脏不良事件(MACE),包括全因死亡、心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建。结果:预测5年MSA最佳临界值为近端LM 11.4 mm²(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.62),远端LM 8.4 mm²(AUC 0.58), LAD开口8.1 mm²(AUC 0.57)。基于这些临界值,LM近端支架扩张不足与5年MACE风险增加显著相关(校正风险比[HR] 2.34)。结论:实现LM近端支架充分扩张,防止LM远端和LAD洞口的扩张不足,对于改善长期临床结果至关重要。确定的MSA阈值可作为LM PCI期间支架优化的实用基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurointervention
Eurointervention CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: EuroIntervention Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal whose aim is to create a community of high quality research and education in the field of percutaneous and surgical cardiovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信