Physical activity interventions for hospitalised people living with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Emma Elliott, Jodi Ventre, Sarah Kate Smith, William Carey, Charlotte Eost-Telling, Annemarie Money, Toby Bryce-Jones, Victoria Dickens, Chris J Todd, Emma R L C Vardy
{"title":"Physical activity interventions for hospitalised people living with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Emma Elliott, Jodi Ventre, Sarah Kate Smith, William Carey, Charlotte Eost-Telling, Annemarie Money, Toby Bryce-Jones, Victoria Dickens, Chris J Todd, Emma R L C Vardy","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01304-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>People living with dementia are vulnerable to adverse outcomes of hospitalisation, such as functional decline and deconditioning. The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of hospital-based interventions involving physical activity on deconditioning outcomes in people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched to January 2025 to identify eligible studies. Two researchers independently carried out screening, data extraction and quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>adults with a diagnosis of dementia, acute hospital admission, and interventions involving physical activity during hospitalisation. Data were pooled for strength, balance, functional outcomes, readmission, falls, length of stay, and delirium. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2179 records were identified and six studies (n = 576 with dementia) included: one randomised-controlled trial, five non-randomised or quasi-randomised. Studies were conducted in an \"acute care for elders unit\" (n = 2), acute psychogeriatric ward (n = 2), general medical unit (n = 1), and geriatric rehabilitation ward (n = 1) across six countries. In meta-analyses, there was less decline in basic activities of daily living at 3 months in the physical activity group (change from pre-admission status); two studies, mean difference 1.27 (95% CI 0.36-2.18) but there were no differences found in all other outcomes at discharge or 3 months, compared to usual care. Certainty of the evidence is low/very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to the limited available evidence, there is uncertainty about the effect of physical activity interventions above usual care. More high-quality research is needed to improve outcomes for people living with dementia in hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01304-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: People living with dementia are vulnerable to adverse outcomes of hospitalisation, such as functional decline and deconditioning. The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of hospital-based interventions involving physical activity on deconditioning outcomes in people living with dementia.

Methods: Five databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched to January 2025 to identify eligible studies. Two researchers independently carried out screening, data extraction and quality assessment.

Inclusion criteria: adults with a diagnosis of dementia, acute hospital admission, and interventions involving physical activity during hospitalisation. Data were pooled for strength, balance, functional outcomes, readmission, falls, length of stay, and delirium. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

Results: 2179 records were identified and six studies (n = 576 with dementia) included: one randomised-controlled trial, five non-randomised or quasi-randomised. Studies were conducted in an "acute care for elders unit" (n = 2), acute psychogeriatric ward (n = 2), general medical unit (n = 1), and geriatric rehabilitation ward (n = 1) across six countries. In meta-analyses, there was less decline in basic activities of daily living at 3 months in the physical activity group (change from pre-admission status); two studies, mean difference 1.27 (95% CI 0.36-2.18) but there were no differences found in all other outcomes at discharge or 3 months, compared to usual care. Certainty of the evidence is low/very low.

Conclusion: Due to the limited available evidence, there is uncertainty about the effect of physical activity interventions above usual care. More high-quality research is needed to improve outcomes for people living with dementia in hospital.

住院痴呆患者的身体活动干预:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:痴呆症患者很容易受到住院治疗的不良后果的影响,如功能下降和身体状况恶化。本综述的目的是检查以医院为基础的干预措施的有效性,包括身体活动对痴呆症患者的去适应结果的影响。方法:检索截至2025年1月的5个数据库(MEDLINE、CENTRAL、Embase、PsycINFO和CINAHL)以确定符合条件的研究。两名研究人员独立进行了筛选、数据提取和质量评估。纳入标准:诊断为痴呆的成年人,急性住院,并在住院期间进行身体活动干预。汇总了力量、平衡、功能结局、再入院、跌倒、住院时间和谵妄的数据。我们使用GRADE来评估证据的确定性。结果:2179条记录被确定,包括6项研究(n = 576例痴呆):1项随机对照试验,5项非随机或准随机试验。研究在6个国家的“急性老年护理病房”(n = 2)、急性老年精神科病房(n = 2)、普通医疗病房(n = 1)和老年康复病房(n = 1)进行。在荟萃分析中,体育锻炼组在3个月时的基本日常生活活动下降较少(与入院前相比有所改变);两项研究,平均差异1.27 (95% CI 0.36-2.18),但在出院或3个月时,与常规护理相比,所有其他结果均无差异。证据的确定性很低/很低。结论:由于现有证据有限,体育活动干预优于常规护理的效果尚不确定。需要更多高质量的研究来改善住院痴呆症患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信